ON
← Back to feed
Gary Glitter pleads not guilty to sex offence charges
Ireland🏛️ Politics12 hr. ago

Gary Glitter pleads not guilty to sex offence charges

Former pop star Gary Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, has pleaded not guilty to eight charges related to alleged sexual offenses committed against a girl between the ages of eight and 11. The alleged incidents occurred between 1978 and 1981. Glitter, now 82, appeared in court via videolink from HMP Channing Wood at Southwark Crown Court in the UK. He denied all charges, stating 'absolutely not guilty' to two of them and 'not guilty' to the other six. The charges include multiple counts of indecent assault, indecency with a child, and sexual intercourse with a minor. The case has been adjourned for a trial scheduled to begin in November 2027. The Metropolitan Police confirmed that the allegations were first reported in January 2025, leading to Glitter's interview in July 2025. He remains in custody pending the trial.

Gary Glitter, the former British pop star known for hits such as Rock And Roll and I’m The Leader Of The Gang, has pleaded not guilty to eight charges of sexual offences against a minor. The charges date back to between 1978 and 1981 and involve allegations of repeated abuse against a girl who was between eight and 11 years old at the time. Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, made his appearance in court via videolink from HMP Channing Wood, a prison in England, during a hearing held at Southwark Crown Court in London. He responded to each charge individually, stating “absolutely not guilty” to two and “not guilty” to the remaining six. The charges include four counts of indecent assault, two counts of indecency with a child, and two charges of engaging in sexual intercourse with a girl under the age of 13. According to court records, the alleged misconduct reportedly involved the victim touching Glitter’s genitals and participating in unlawful sexual activity. The prosecution alleges that these acts occurred over several years, spanning the late 1970s into the early 1980s. During the court session, Judge Tony Baumgartner, the Recorder of Westminster, adjourned the case for further proceedings, setting the trial to begin on 22 November 2027. The trial will last for three weeks, during which time Glitter will remain in custody. The Metropolitan Police confirmed that the allegations were initially reported to the force in January 2025. Following this, Glitter was interviewed in July 2025 as part of an ongoing investigation. The police have not yet released additional details regarding the specific circumstances of the allegations or the identity of the victim. However, legal representatives for both parties have indicated that the case will proceed through the judicial process, with the trial scheduled to take place in the coming months. Glitter rose to international fame in the early 1970s, becoming one of the leading figures in the glam rock scene. His music, characterized by its flamboyant style and catchy melodies, earned him a devoted fan base and numerous accolades. Despite his success, his career faced setbacks in the 1980s following accusations of drug use and erratic behavior. In 1986, he was sentenced to a suspended prison term after admitting to using cocaine. Since then, he has largely remained in the public eye through appearances, interviews, and occasional media commentary. This latest legal proceeding marks another chapter in Glitter’s long and controversial public life. While some fans continue to admire his musical contributions, others have expressed outrage over the allegations, particularly given the historical context of the crimes. Legal experts suggest that the case could have far-reaching implications, especially considering the potential for new evidence to emerge during the trial. The prosecution will need to establish a clear timeline of events and provide corroborating testimony to support the allegations. As the trial approaches, attention will likely shift toward the legal strategies employed by both sides. Defense attorneys may challenge the credibility of the allegations, while prosecutors will aim to present compelling evidence to secure a conviction. The outcome of the trial could influence future cases involving historical sexual misconduct allegations, particularly those involving high-profile individuals. For now, the focus remains on the upcoming proceedings, with all eyes on the courtroom as the case unfolds.

1 reports

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 8012 hr. ago
Gary Glitter pleads not guilty to sex offence charges

Former pop star Gary Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, has pleaded not guilty to eight charges related to alleged sexual offenses committed against a girl between the ages of eight and 11. The alleged incidents occurred between 1978 and 1981. Glitter, now 82, appeared in court via videolink from HMP Channing Wood at Southwark Crown Court in the UK. He denied all charges, stating 'absolutely not guilty' to two of them and 'not guilty' to the other six. The charges include multiple counts of indecent assault, indecency with a child, and sexual intercourse with a minor. The case has been adjourned for a trial scheduled to begin in November 2027. The Metropolitan Police confirmed that the allegations were first reported in January 2025, leading to Glitter's interview in July 2025. He remains in custody pending the trial.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal proceedings involving a former celebrity facing serious criminal charges. It presents the facts of the case without apparent bias, quoting the defendant's plea and providing procedural details of the court process. There is no evident framing that favors one side over另一方

Why factuality (85): The article reports facts based on court proceedings and official statements. It accurately states the charges, the defendant's plea, and the timeline of events. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the nature of the charges and the legal process. However, it does not provide details

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a neutral tone, focusing on the legal proceedings and the defendant's response. While it uses formal language, there is no overt bias or emotional language. However, the phrasing 'repeated sexual abuse' and 'unlawful sexual intercourse' could be seen as slight

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories