The Italian newspaper *Il Giornale* reports on the ongoing controversy surrounding the Garlasco case, focusing on the role of the Carabinieri’s Scientific Research Unit (Ris). The head of the Carabinieri, General Salvatore Luongo, emphasized the unit's commitment to transparency and collaboration with the judiciary while stating that any individuals found responsible for errors would face consequences. The article highlights concerns over the destruction of liquid evidence related to the murder of Chiara Poggi in May 2016, six years before judicial approval for such disposal was granted. According to *Tg1*, this decision was made by Colonel Marino of the Ris in Parma, raising questions about procedural compliance.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from the head of the Carabinieri and references court documents without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from both the military authority and investigative reports, maintaining neutrality in framing the issue.
Why factuality (80): This article provides more detailed statements from the General Commander of the Carabinieri, Salvatore Luongo, including his comments on the role of the Ris and the importance of transparency. While it references multiple statements from Luongo, it does not include direct quotes from judicial or fo
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting Luongo’s statements without overt bias. However, it emphasizes the authority of the Carabinieri and the importance of scientific rigor, which may subtly favor the institution rather than presenting a fully balanced view of all parties invol






