Gaps in NHS end-of-life care ‘denying ill children chance to die at home’
Critics argue that the NHS in England is failing to meet its legal obligation to provide end-of-life care at home for seriously ill children, leading to many being forced to die in hospitals instead. This issue creates a 'postcode lottery' where access to palliative care depends on location, with nearly 89,000 under-19s in England affected by life-limiting conditions. The number of these children has nearly tripled since 2003-04 due to medical advancements and more complex illnesses. According to a report by the charity Together for Short Lives, 36% of NHS integrated care boards (ICBs) do not commission necessary home-based end-of-life care, and only 31% can confirm they are doing so. Families are often left seeking emergency care or hospital admission, which can result in death occurring in a hospital setting rather than at home. The charity highlights financial constraints and misconceptions within the NHS that prioritize palliative care for older adults over children.
More than half of nurses in the United Kingdom have treated terminally ill patients in corridors or other non-designated clinical areas, according to a survey conducted by Marie Curie, the country's leading end-of-life care charity. The findings, published on September 2, 2026, reveal a systemic challenge in delivering dignified end-of-life care across the National Health Service (NHS). Among the 1,153 nurses and healthcare professionals surveyed, 55% reported treating patients in unsuitable environments, including waiting rooms and hospital corridors. Over 70% cited staffing shortages as a major obstacle to providing adequate end-of-life care, while more than half noted that insufficient time constrained their ability to offer proper care. One particularly distressing account detailed a terminal cancer patient who died on the bathroom floor following a CPR attempt. A nurse recounted the incident, describing how the patient was never expected to recover and how the family was left in a state of hysteria. “We were never going to get her back,” the nurse said. “She died on the floor in the bathroom, undignified, family hysterical, staff all left traumatised.” Another nurse shared the story of an elderly man who carried a paper care plan in his pocket to prevent unwanted interventions. These accounts underscore the emotional toll on both patients and medical personnel, highlighting the urgent need for reform in end-of-life care delivery. The survey also uncovered issues related to communication and documentation. Nurses reported confusion regarding patients' final wishes, often due to reliance on outdated paper records and inconsistent electronic systems used by different care providers. In one case, a patient in her late 80s with advanced multi-organ failure received CPR despite the clinical team believing it was futile. The patient’s family later expressed regret, stating she would not have wanted such an intervention. The nurse involved explained that the absence of clear documentation led to the unnecessary procedure, adding to the distress of the family and the trauma for the medical staff. Sarah Williamson, director of nursing and quality at Marie Curie, emphasized the importance of respecting patients' end-of-life decisions. “When someone has taken the time to think about how they want to die, that decision should follow them, wherever they are and to whoever is caring for them,” she stated. The charity is currently piloting new approaches in collaboration with the NHS, aiming to identify individuals nearing the end of life earlier and implement appropriate support measures, including advance care plans. However, Williamson acknowledged that the challenges extend beyond individual efforts and require broader systemic changes. The findings align with previous reports criticizing the NHS for failing to meet the legal obligation to provide at-home end-of-life care for seriously ill children. According to data from the charity Together for Short Lives, nearly 89,000 under-19s in England suffer from life-limiting conditions, yet many are unable to die at home due to inadequate community-based care. Nick Carroll, CEO of Together for Short Lives, condemned the situation as “cruel,” noting that the postcode lottery in palliative care denies some families the chance to spend their child’s final moments at home. Freedom of information requests revealed that 36% of the NHS’s 42 integrated care boards (ICBs) do not commission necessary end-of-life care services, exacerbating the problem. Campaigners argue that the lack of investment in home-based care forces critically ill children to remain in hospitals, where they may ultimately pass away. Sarah Buchan Cooke, whose son Dylan died at home in 2023 after a prolonged illness, stressed the significance of allowing families to make choices about their child’s final days. “It breaks my heart to think of other families in our situation not being able to have that same level of care and support,” she said. The charity’s calls for action coincide with the anticipated release of the UK government’s Modern Services Framework for Palliative and End of Life Care, which aims to address gaps in the current system. As the debate over end-of-life care intensifies, stakeholders emphasize the need for comprehensive reforms to ensure that all patients, regardless of age, are afforded the dignity and respect they deserve in their final hours. The ongoing discussions highlight the complexity of balancing resource constraints with the ethical imperative to provide compassionate, personalized care. With the NHS facing mounting pressure, the urgency for systemic improvements has never been greater.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Critics argue that the NHS in England is failing to meet its legal obligation to provide end-of-life care at home for seriously ill children, leading to many being forced to die in hospitals instead. This issue creates a 'postcode lottery' where access to palliative care depends on location, with nearly 89,000 under-19s in England affected by life-limiting conditions. The number of these children has nearly tripled since 2003-04 due to medical advancements and more complex illnesses. According to a report by the charity Together for Short Lives, 36% of NHS integrated care boards (ICBs) do not commission necessary home-based end-of-life care, and only 31% can confirm they are doing so. Families are often left seeking emergency care or hospital admission, which can result in death occurring in a hospital setting rather than at home. The charity highlights financial constraints and misconceptions within the NHS that prioritize palliative care for older adults over children.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective on the NHS's failure to fulfill its legal obligations regarding end-of-life care for children, emphasizing systemic neglect and inequality. It uses emotionally charged language like 'cruel,' 'shame us all,' and 'neglect,' and focuses on the shortcomings of
Why factuality (85): The Guardian article accurately reflects the primary source's claim that the number of children with life-limiting conditions has nearly tripled since 2003-04. It cites the increase in complexity of their illnesses and mentions the legal obligations under the Health and Care Act 2022. The article re
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the issue as a systemic failure within the NHS, quoting critics and the charity Together for Short Lives. While it highlights the concerns raised by campaigners, it maintains a relatively balanced tone by mentioning the legal requirements and the efforts of ICBs. However, it lea
A survey conducted by the UK-based charity Marie Curie revealed that over half of the nurses surveyed reported providing end-of-life care to patients in 'unsafe and undignified' spaces such as hospital corridors and bathrooms. The report highlights cases where patients received CPR despite having expressed a wish not to receive life-sustaining treatment, causing emotional distress for both families and medical staff. One instance described a terminally ill woman who died on a bathroom floor after CPR was administered against her wishes, leaving her family distraught. Nurses shared experiences of inadequate documentation of patient preferences, leading to interventions that contradicted the patients’ end-of-life decisions. The findings underscore concerns about the lack of proper facilities and adherence to patient autonomy in palliative care settings.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from a survey conducted by a reputable charity, highlighting systemic issues within the NHS regarding end-of-life care practices. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing; rather, it reports on the experiences of healthcare workers and the inade
Why factuality (75): The Daily Mirror article references a Marie Curie survey with specific statistics (55% of nurses treating patients in non-designated areas) and includes direct quotes from nurses. However, it does not cite the primary source document about increasing complexity in children with life-limiting conditi
Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'harrowing', 'undignified', and 'traumatised' to describe the situation. It frames the issue as a moral failing of the NHS, emphasizing the suffering of patients and families without presenting counterpoints or systemic solutions. The tone is hig
A survey conducted by Marie Curie, involving over 1,100 nurses in the UK, highlights serious concerns about the conditions under which end-of-life care is provided. Nearly 55% of participating nurses reported treating terminally ill patients in unsafe or non-designated areas like hospital corridors or waiting rooms. Over 70% cited staffing shortages as a major obstacle to delivering proper end-of-life care, while more than half mentioned insufficient time as a constraint. Nurses shared distressing accounts, including a case where a terminal cancer patient died on a bathroom floor after an unsuccessful CPR attempt, and another instance where a patient carried his care plan manually to ensure his wishes were respected. The report criticizes systemic issues within the NHS, including fragmented electronic health records and inadequate 24/7 support, which force patients into emergency departments during crises.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from a survey conducted by Marie Curie, a charitable organization focused on end-of-life care, highlighting systemic challenges in the NHS related to staffing, resources, and patient dignity. While the content critiques aspects of healthcare delivery, it does not take a
Why factuality (70): The second Daily Mirror article references the Marie Curie survey with similar statistics (55% of nurses treating patients in non-designated areas) and includes direct quotes from nurses. Like the first article, it focuses on adult end-of-life care rather than the specific focus on children in the p
Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'harrowing', 'alarming', and 'stark reality' to emphasize the severity of the situation. It quotes Sarah Williamson from Marie Curie, reinforcing the narrative of inadequate care and suffering. While it attempts to present the nurses' experiences
A report based on a survey of 1,153 UK nurses and healthcare professionals highlights significant issues in end-of-life care within NHS hospitals. More than half of the respondents indicated that they have provided end-of-life care in corridors or other non-clinical areas like cupboards and offices, often resulting in undignified conditions for terminally ill patients. Overcrowding and staff shortages contribute to these challenges, with many patients being placed on trollies where they must use the restroom or even pass away in public view. The study also revealed that more than a third of nurses have witnessed CPR being administered when they believed it was inappropriate, sometimes against the patient’s wishes. Care planning deficiencies lead to confusion regarding patient preferences at the end of life, causing distress among families and loved ones. The findings emphasize the need for systemic improvements in end-of-life care.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective on the state of NHS hospitals, emphasizing systemic failures such as staff shortages, inadequate resources, and poor end-of-life care practices. It highlights the negative impact of government policies and funding decisions on healthcare delivery, using a
Why factuality (70): The Daily Mail article references the Marie Curie survey with similar statistics (55% of nurses treating patients in non-designated areas) and includes direct quotes from nurses. However, it omits the primary source's focus on children with life-limiting conditions and instead emphasizes adult end-o
Why objectivity (55): The article uses strong, emotive language such as 'damning report', 'crippling staff shortages', and 'languishing on trollies'. It paints the NHS in a negative light, focusing on the suffering of patients and the inadequacy of the system. The tone is biased towards criticism of the NHS without prese
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
United Kingdom
