ON
← Back to feed
Game, set, match: 68,000 players face eviction in north shore tennis stoush
Australia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressiveyesterday

Game, set, match: 68,000 players face eviction in north shore tennis stoush

An Aboriginal land council in New South Wales has issued an eviction notice to the Northern Suburbs Tennis Association (NSTA), requiring them to vacate the Talus Street Tennis Centre at Naremburn by September 30, 2026. The site, which has hosted over 62,000 player visits annually and features historic tennis facilities used by champions like Evonne Goolagong Cawley and Pat Cash, was transferred to the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council (MLALC) through a successful land claim in 2022. The NSTA, which has operated the center since 1978, pays $46,000 in annual rent, a sum the MLALC argues is significantly below market value for the prime north shore location. The dispute highlights tensions around NSW Aboriginal land rights laws, particularly regarding the management of land returned to Indigenous communities. The MLALC is also exploring redevelopment options for the site, including a proposed 18-story apartment complex, though this plan was recently rejected by the NSW government’s Housing Delivery Authority.

Game, set, match: 68,000 players face eviction in north shore tennis stoush The Northern Suburbs Tennis Association (NSTA) has received an official eviction notice requiring it to vacate the Talus Street Tennis Centre at Naremburn by September 30, 2026. The decision follows a successful land claim by the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council (MLALC) in 2022, which granted ownership of the Crown land reserve. The move has sparked a heated dispute involving local residents, sports figures, and political leaders, with the potential to end nearly five decades of community tennis in the area. The NSTA has operated the eight-court facility since 1978, with Love’n Deuce managing the center for approximately 40 years. The organization has recorded more than 62,000 player visits annually, making it one of the busiest community tennis centers in Sydney. Among those affected are Jo Chapple and her son George Tams, who are actively campaigning to preserve the facility. The eviction threatens to disrupt the legacy of the site, where generations of players, including Australian legends such as Evonne Goolagong Cawley and Pat Cash, have honed their skills. The dispute centers around the financial terms of the site's usage. Under the existing lease agreements, the NSTA pays an annual rent of $46,000. However, the MLALC argues that this sum is significantly lower than the market rate for a commercial operation on prime north shore land. Nathan Moran, chief executive of the MLALC, stated that the land council has spent the past year evaluating whether to raise the rent or find an alternative operator willing to pay a fair price. He emphasized the need to cover costs such as insurance, rates, and maintenance while ensuring the site does not become a financial burden. Moran described the current rental arrangement as insufficient, stating, “Paying $46,000 for operating eight commercial courts does not pass the pub test.” The MLALC has also explored redevelopment opportunities, submitting plans for an 18-story residential tower with 303 apartments earlier this year. Although the proposal was rejected by the NSW government’s Housing Delivery Authority, alternative planning paths remain available. In response, NSTA president Wayne Pascoe expressed frustration over the lack of negotiation opportunities. He confirmed the association is open to paying more to retain the site but noted they have yet to secure a meeting with the MLALC. Pascoe highlighted the substantial investment made in the facility, including over $10 million in improvements since 1979 and more than $500,000 in recent upgrades. Financial records from 2025 reveal the association generated $614,223 in revenue and achieved an operating surplus of $98,465. The potential loss of the courts has raised concerns among club members, staff, and nearby residents, many of whom fear the community facility might be permanently displaced. Love’n Deuce executive director Paul Franci has also voiced apprehension over the impact of the eviction on both the local tennis scene and the broader community. As the deadline approaches, the situation remains unresolved, with all parties awaiting further developments.

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
Game, set, match: 68,000 players face eviction in north shore tennis stoush

An Aboriginal land council in New South Wales has issued an eviction notice to the Northern Suburbs Tennis Association (NSTA), requiring them to vacate the Talus Street Tennis Centre at Naremburn by September 30, 2026. The site, which has hosted over 62,000 player visits annually and features historic tennis facilities used by champions like Evonne Goolagong Cawley and Pat Cash, was transferred to the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council (MLALC) through a successful land claim in 2022. The NSTA, which has operated the center since 1978, pays $46,000 in annual rent, a sum the MLALC argues is significantly below market value for the prime north shore location. The dispute highlights tensions around NSW Aboriginal land rights laws, particularly regarding the management of land returned to Indigenous communities. The MLALC is also exploring redevelopment options for the site, including a proposed 18-story apartment complex, though this plan was recently rejected by the NSW government’s Housing Delivery Authority.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the dispute as a conflict between Indigenous land rights and established community facilities, emphasizing the MLALC's position as rightful owners seeking fair compensation. It highlights the low rent paid by the NSTA compared to market value, suggesting systemic undervaluation of

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the eviction notice issued to the Northern Suburbs Tennis Association (NSTA) by the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council (MLALC), citing the 2022 land claim as a basis. It mentions the historical operation of the facility, the number of annual vi

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the situation from the perspective of the NSTA and local residents, highlighting their efforts to save the tennis operations. It uses emotionally charged language like 'stunned members' and 'threatens to end almost 50 years of tennis,' which may lean toward portraying the evicti

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
Game, set, match: 68,000 players face eviction in north shore tennis stoush

A longstanding community tennis center in Sydney's north shore faces potential closure after an Aboriginal land council secured ownership of the site through a successful land claim in 2022. The Northern Suburbs Tennis Association (NSTA), which has operated the facility for nearly 50 years, received an eviction notice requiring them to vacate the premises by September 30. The dispute centers around the financial terms of the lease, with the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council (MLALC) arguing that the current $46,000 annual rent paid by the NSTA is significantly below market value. The MLALC has explored options such as increasing the rent or seeking a new operator willing to pay a fairer rate, while also considering redevelopment proposals for the site. The situation has sparked broader discussions about Aboriginal land rights laws and their implications for existing community infrastructure.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, highlighting the historical significance of the tennis center and the legal and financial arguments made by the MLALC. It includes quotes from both the NSTA representatives and the MLALC CEO, providing balanced coverage of the dispute without overtly favoring a

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the eviction of the Northern Suburbs Tennis Association from the Talus Street Tennis Centre due to an Aboriginal land council acquiring the site. It mentions the date of the eviction notice, the parties involved, and the historical context of the facility. While no primary sou

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the situation with a somewhat sympathetic tone toward the tennis center and its supporters, using phrases like 'stunned members' and 'threatens to end almost 50 years of tennis.' It frames the issue as a conflict between community needs and legal land rights, which may subtly fa

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories