ON
← Back to feed
'Game-changing' drug allows children with allergies to eat foods that would have killed them
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 days ago

'Game-changing' drug allows children with allergies to eat foods that would have killed them

A study published in JAMA Pediatrics found that the drug omalizumab can significantly reduce the risk of severe allergic reactions in children with multiple food allergies. The research involved 117 children aged around seven, all allergic to peanuts and at least two other foods. Half received omalizumab combined with standard immunotherapy, while the other half received omalizumab alone for a year. Results showed that nearly a third of those on omalizumab alone could tolerate 4 grams or more of all three trigger foods, compared to less than 20% on standard therapy. Additionally, 70% of omalizumab-treated patients could handle accidental exposures, versus 40% on standard therapy. At higher doses, 25% of omalizumab recipients could safely consume full servings of their allergens, whereas 27% on standard therapy experienced anaphylaxis. None of the omalizumab group had serious adverse reactions, compared to over 30% on standard therapy.

A groundbreaking study has revealed that a drug typically used to treat asthma could dramatically reduce the risk of life-threatening allergic reactions in children with multiple food allergies. The findings suggest that the monoclonal antibody omalizumab might allow hundreds of thousands of children to safely consume foods that previously posed a deadly danger. The research, led by scientists at Stanford Medicine, examined the effects of omalizumab on 117 children aged an average of seven years old. All participants had severe allergies to peanuts and at least two additional foods, including milk, eggs, wheat, cashews, hazelnuts, and walnuts. Half of the children received eight weeks of omalizumab followed by standard oral immunotherapy, while the other half were given omalizumab for the entire year through injections administered every two weeks or once a month. The results showed that nearly a third of the children treated with omalizumab alone were able to tolerate 4 grams, approximately a teaspoon, of each of their three allergenic foods at the end of the treatment period. This is significantly higher than the less than 20 percent of children receiving standard immunotherapy who achieved similar outcomes. Additionally, over 70 percent of those treated with omalizumab could safely manage accidental exposures to their allergens, compared to just 40 percent of those on conventional therapy. The study further demonstrated that at the highest level tested, equivalent to a full serving of the allergenic food, a quarter of the omalizumab-treated children were able to consume all three of their allergens without experiencing a severe reaction. In contrast, 27 percent of those undergoing standard immunotherapy developed anaphylaxis upon exposure, while only 2 percent of the omalizumab group did so. None of the children in the omalizumab group experienced serious adverse reactions requiring immediate medical intervention, whereas over 30 percent of the standard treatment group needed urgent care. Omalizumab works by binding to and neutralizing the proteins responsible for triggering allergic responses within the body. It is currently approved in the United States for preventing allergic reactions, but its use for treating food allergies has yet to be officially sanctioned by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) in the United Kingdom. Food allergies have become increasingly prevalent, with the number of individuals affected in the UK doubling between 2008 and 2018. Globally, approximately 220 million people experience allergic reactions to specific foods, and around two million in the UK have a diagnosed food allergy. While many experience only mild symptoms such as itching or digestive discomfort, about a quarter of these individuals progress to anaphylaxis, a potentially fatal condition characterized by swelling of the airways, loss of consciousness, and possible cardiac arrest. The researchers emphasized that although the study's findings are promising, they acknowledged that the significant differences in effectiveness between the two treatment groups could be influenced by the relatively high dropout rate among those receiving standard immunotherapy. Despite this limitation, the team expressed optimism about the potential of omalizumab to offer safer and more effective options for managing severe food allergies.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 704 days ago
'Game-changing' drug allows children with allergies to eat foods that would have killed them

A study published in JAMA Pediatrics found that the drug omalizumab can significantly reduce the risk of severe allergic reactions in children with multiple food allergies. The research involved 117 children aged around seven, all allergic to peanuts and at least two other foods. Half received omalizumab combined with standard immunotherapy, while the other half received omalizumab alone for a year. Results showed that nearly a third of those on omalizumab alone could tolerate 4 grams or more of all three trigger foods, compared to less than 20% on standard therapy. Additionally, 70% of omalizumab-treated patients could handle accidental exposures, versus 40% on standard therapy. At higher doses, 25% of omalizumab recipients could safely consume full servings of their allergens, whereas 27% on standard therapy experienced anaphylaxis. None of the omalizumab group had serious adverse reactions, compared to over 30% on standard therapy.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a scientific study without overt ideological framing. It focuses on medical findings and patient outcomes, avoiding commentary on political policies or partisan agendas. While the topic relates to public health, the tone remains neutral, emphasizing clinical results rather than褒

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a study published in JAMA Pediatrics involving 117 participants with peanut allergies. It accurately describes the study design, the use of omalizumab, and the outcomes regarding reduced allergic reactions. However, it does not mention the exact percentage reduction in reactio

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'life-threatening,' 'killed them,' and 'game-changing' to emphasize the significance of the findings. While it presents both treatment approaches (standard immunotherapy vs. omalizumab), it frames omalizumab more favorably without providing a bal

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories