ON
← Back to feed
Galway bookseller suspects 'scattergun' order is for AI
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive11 days ago

Galway bookseller suspects 'scattergun' order is for AI

Galway-based bookshop owner Tomás Kenny suspects an unusual order for 'several thousand books' may be intended for AI training purposes. The order, received in May 2026, included outdated and low-quality non-fiction titles such as driving test manuals and guides related to the Irish economic period known as the Celtic Tiger. While the order appeared to come from a third party and lacked buyer identification, the selection of obscure and obsolete materials raised concerns. Kenny notes this is not an isolated case, as similar patterns have been reported by bookstores in Sweden and Germany. The issue ties into broader legal debates around the use of copyrighted material in AI development, highlighted by a recent $1.3 billion copyright class-action settlement against Anthropic for allegedly using pirated books to train its AI model.

Galway bookseller Tomás Kenny has raised concerns that a recent large-scale order of books may have been placed for artificial intelligence training purposes. The order, which arrived in May, consisted of several thousand books, many of which appeared to be outdated or of poor quality. Titles included three-decade-old driving test manuals and a guide to the Celtic Tiger financial scheme known as the Special Savings Incentive Account (SSIA). Mr Kenny described the selection as “scattergun,” suggesting a lack of specific focus or purpose. Mr Kenny, who runs the family-owned bookshop Kennys, initially thought the order might be from a library or educational institution. Such orders are common, often coming through third-party platforms where the buyer’s identity remains anonymous. However, as his team began preparing the shipment, they noticed inconsistencies. The range of books seemed random, with a heavy emphasis on non-fiction titles that appeared obsolete or irrelevant to modern readers. While Mr Kenny does not have conclusive proof, he believes the order could be related to AI development. He stated, “That's the suspicion, very obviously.” This speculation comes amid growing discussions around the use of copyrighted materials in AI training models. The issue has sparked legal battles and regulatory scrutiny globally. The bookseller noted that such unusual orders are not isolated. Over the past few months, he has observed similar patterns flagged by other book retailers in countries such as Sweden and Germany. These reports suggest a broader trend, possibly linked to the increasing demand for vast datasets used in AI training. Online shopping has further complicated matters, reducing the number of independent bookstores and making it harder to track the origins of such orders. Kennys, which celebrated its 85th anniversary last year, maintains one of the oldest books websites in the world. Its extensive catalog makes it a target for bulk purchases, especially those that appear to lack clear intent. Despite the challenges posed by digital retail, the store continues to operate as a key player in the Irish literary scene. The controversy surrounding AI and copyright has reached new heights following a landmark case involving Anthropic, the developer of the Claude AI model. A U.S. federal judge recently approved a historic €1.3 billion copyright class-action settlement against the company. The lawsuit alleged that Anthropic had trained its AI on over 500,000 pirated books, violating intellectual property rights. Eligible authors and publishers are set to receive approximately €2,600 per qualifying title. This legal action underscores the ongoing debate over how AI systems are developed and the ethical implications of using copyrighted works without authorization. While the specifics of the case remain under court review, the precedent it sets could influence future disputes involving AI and intellectual property. As the conversation around AI ethics continues to evolve, cases like the one involving Kennys highlight the complex intersection of technology, commerce, and law. Bookstores, once central to cultural life, now find themselves navigating an increasingly digital landscape where traditional business models face unprecedented challenges. For now, Mr Kenny remains vigilant, monitoring further developments and hoping for clarity on the true purpose behind the mysterious order.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6011 days ago
Lise Hand: AI companies destroying books to feed the machines? What fresh hell...

An article by Lise Hand discusses the controversial practice of AI companies like Anthropic scanning physical books to train their large language models. The piece references a court case involving Anthropic's 'Project Panama,' where the company purchased and destroyed thousands of books to convert them into digital data. Internal memos describe the process as 'destructively' scanning books by removing pages and discarding the original paper copies. While the activity is deemed legal under U.S. copyright law, critics argue it represents a dystopian approach to knowledge acquisition, likening it to a 'brave new world.' The article highlights concerns over the ethical implications of repurposing books as 'LLM fodder' and raises questions about the future of physical literature.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the destruction of books by AI companies as a dystopian and ethically questionable act, using strong language such as 'utterly dystopian,' 'creepy feeling,' and 'fresh hell.' It emphasizes the negative consequences of this practice and criticizes the lack of transparency and legal

Why factuality (85): The article references the primary source document from The Guardian regarding the Bartz v Anthropic PBC case and accurately describes Project Panama as described in the court documents. It correctly identifies the purpose of the project and the legal reasoning behind Anthropic's actions. However, i

Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'fresh hell' and 'dystopian,' indicating a strong negative reaction to the idea of AI companies destroying books. While it presents the facts, the tone leans towards sensationalism rather than objective reporting.

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 75Objective 8013 days ago
Galway bookseller suspects 'scattergun' order is for AI

Galway-based bookshop owner Tomás Kenny suspects an unusual order for 'several thousand books' may be intended for AI training purposes. The order, received in May 2026, included outdated and low-quality non-fiction titles such as driving test manuals and guides related to the Irish economic period known as the Celtic Tiger. While the order appeared to come from a third party and lacked buyer identification, the selection of obscure and obsolete materials raised concerns. Kenny notes this is not an isolated case, as similar patterns have been reported by bookstores in Sweden and Germany. The issue ties into broader legal debates around the use of copyrighted material in AI development, highlighted by a recent $1.3 billion copyright class-action settlement against Anthropic for allegedly using pirated books to train its AI model.

Bias read (Center): While the article touches on AI ethics and intellectual property law, which are politically charged topics, the framing remains neutral. It presents both the anecdotal concern from the bookshop owner and the broader legal context without overtly favoring either side of the debate. The focus is on事实和

Why factuality (75): The article reports on a specific claim by Tomás Kenny of Kennys bookshop regarding an unusual order potentially linked to AI. It cites direct quotes from the bookshop owner and mentions the nature of the order (scattergun, outdated titles, poor quality). While no primary source is available, the in

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the bookshop owner's perspective neutrally, quoting him directly and explaining his reasoning. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though the term 'suspects' is used, which slightly leans toward the narrative but remains objective overall.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories