ON
← Back to feed
Ben Gvir publicly calls for killing "between 30 and 40 people every night" in Gaza
World🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

Ben Gvir publicly calls for killing "between 30 and 40 people every night" in Gaza

A high-ranking Israeli politician from the extreme-right coalition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly called for killing 'between 30 and 40 people each night' in Gaza during a podcast interview with a former hostage held in Gaza. The comments were made by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s Minister of National Security, who criticized the recent reduction in Israeli attacks on Gaza and argued that some Palestinians are 'not worthy of living.' These remarks echo past controversial statements by Ben-Gvir and other Israeli officials, which have been presented to the UN International Court of Justice as evidence of potential genocide intentions. Israel denies committing genocide in Gaza. Israeli media has largely ignored these statements, highlighting how previously marginal ideologies like Ben-Gvir’s are gaining influence ahead of the October 27 elections. Ben-Gvir, though lacking direct military command, holds significant power over Israel’s security apparatus, including prisons where thousands of Palestinian detainees are held. He has previously faced legal scrutiny for reducing food rations for Palestinian prisoners.

Netanyahu Rebuffs Trump's Gaza Ceasefire Plan Amid Rising Calls for Ethnic Cleansing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has publicly rejected President Donald Trump’s proposed Gaza ceasefire plan, marking another escalation in the ongoing conflict. According to reports from multiple media outlets, Netanyahu’s refusal comes amid growing internal pressures within Israel, particularly from hardline political figures who advocate for further military action against Palestinians in the occupied territories. The rejection of Trump’s initiative underscores the deepening divide between Israel and its traditional Western allies, with some analysts suggesting that the U.S. is increasingly losing influence over Israeli policy decisions. The controversy surrounding Netanyahu’s stance gained renewed attention following recent statements by Itamar Ben-Gvir, a far-right minister in Netanyahu’s government. In a widely circulated interview with a former hostage held in Gaza, Ben-Gvir reportedly called for the killing of "between 30 and 40 people each night" in the territory, describing certain Palestinians as "not worthy of living." These remarks, which surfaced on August 17, 2026, have sparked outrage among human rights organizations and international legal bodies, with many citing them as evidence of potential genocidal intent. While Israel has consistently denied allegations of genocide, the comments have intensified scrutiny of the country’s policies toward the Palestinian population. Ben-Gvir, a prominent figure in the ultra-nationalist movement, holds significant power within Israel’s security apparatus. He oversees the prison system, where thousands of Palestinians from both the West Bank and Gaza are detained, and he exercises authority over national police operations. His influence has grown substantially since the October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas, during which militants killed approximately 1,200 Israelis and took nearly 250 hostages. Many of the captives later described prolonged periods of starvation, physical and psychological abuse, and in some cases, sexual assault. These experiences have bolstered Ben-Gvir’s popularity among Israeli citizens, especially among supporters of the ruling coalition. Despite his lack of direct command over military operations, Ben-Gvir wields considerable sway over Israel’s security strategy. He has previously advocated for reducing food rations for Palestinian prisoners, a practice that led to a Supreme Court ruling in 2025 condemning the state-run detention facilities under his supervision. The court found that the conditions violated basic standards of humane treatment. Such policies reflect broader patterns of systemic mistreatment of Palestinians, often justified by Israeli officials as necessary measures for national security. The situation in Gaza has deteriorated significantly since the implementation of the ceasefire agreement brokered by Trump in late 2025. According to data from the Ministry of Health in Gaza, over 1,250 civilians have been killed in Israeli airstrikes since the deal took effect. While Israeli authorities claim their attacks target Hamas operatives, critics argue that the campaign disproportionately affects non-combatants. Recent reports indicate that the Israeli Defense Forces have scaled back their operations in response to diplomatic pressure, particularly after Netanyahu’s rejection of Trump’s proposal. However, this shift has caused frustration among hardliners like Ben-Gvir, who believe the military should maintain a higher level of aggression. Amid these developments, calls for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza have resurfaced. Ben-Gvir has suggested that large-scale emigration of Gazans could be pursued, alongside the resettlement of Israeli settlers in the area. Such proposals have drawn condemnation from international legal experts, who warn that they could constitute acts of ethnic cleansing. Ben-Gvir himself has stated that "all of Gaza belongs to us," advocating for the establishment of settlements throughout the territory and the elimination of perceived threats through targeted killings. These statements come as the Israeli government faces mounting domestic and international criticism over its handling of the conflict. The International Court of Justice ruled in July 2024 that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza violates international law, urging an immediate end to the occupation. Despite this, Israeli lawmakers have passed resolutions opposing the creation of an independent Palestinian state, reflecting a persistent resistance to meaningful peace efforts. Meanwhile, Western nations continue to offer rhetorical support for the two-state solution while failing to take decisive action against Israeli violations of international law.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒ConservativeFactual 75Objective 456 days ago
Ben Gvir publicly calls for killing "between 30 and 40 people every night" in Gaza

A high-ranking Israeli politician from the extreme-right coalition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly called for killing 'between 30 and 40 people each night' in Gaza during a podcast interview with a former hostage held in Gaza. The comments were made by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s Minister of National Security, who criticized the recent reduction in Israeli attacks on Gaza and argued that some Palestinians are 'not worthy of living.' These remarks echo past controversial statements by Ben-Gvir and other Israeli officials, which have been presented to the UN International Court of Justice as evidence of potential genocide intentions. Israel denies committing genocide in Gaza. Israeli media has largely ignored these statements, highlighting how previously marginal ideologies like Ben-Gvir’s are gaining influence ahead of the October 27 elections. Ben-Gvir, though lacking direct military command, holds significant power over Israel’s security apparatus, including prisons where thousands of Palestinian detainees are held. He has previously faced legal scrutiny for reducing food rations for Palestinian prisoners.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents explicit statements from a prominent Israeli minister advocating for targeted killings in Gaza, using dehumanizing language ('not worthy of living'). The framing emphasizes the radical nature of his rhetoric and highlights the growing influence of far-right figures in Israeli政治,

Why factuality (75): The article reports on statements made by Israeli politician Itamar Ben-Gvir, which are presented as public remarks advocating targeted killings in Gaza. These statements are contextualized within the broader political and military situation in Israel and Gaza. While the content does not directly re

Why objectivity (45): The article presents the statements of Itamar Ben-Gvir in a manner that emphasizes the controversial nature of his comments, using emotionally charged language such as 'asesinar' (kill) and 'no deberían vivir' (they shouldn't live). This framing suggests a critical stance toward Ben-Gvir's views, po

IPS News (Inter Press Service) logoIPS News (Inter Press Service)IndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 2011 days ago
Frankenstein in Charge: Netanyahu Rejects Trump’s Gaza Plan

The article discusses Israel's rejection of Donald Trump's proposed Gaza peace plan, criticizing Israel's ongoing actions against Palestinians as a continuation of systemic ethnic cleansing since the country's founding. It references the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, which the West allegedly helped shield him from. The piece frames the creation of Israel as a Western initiative that ignored Palestinian suffering and granted Israel immunity. It highlights historical injustices, including the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in 1948, referred to as 'Nakba' by Palestinians. The article also cites past Israeli leaders' alleged dismissiveness toward U.S. influence, though Israeli sources have denied these claims.

Bias read (Progressive): The article uses strong condemnatory language ('genocide', 'ethnic cleansing', 'rogue state') and presents a critical perspective on Israel's actions and the West's role in enabling them. It emphasizes Palestinian suffering and frames Israeli policies as inherently expansionist and illegitimate, all

Why factuality (50): The article incorrectly attributes the ICC arrest warrants to Netanyahu being 'charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity' while the primary source document states that the ICC found 'reasonable grounds to believe' that Netanyahu and others bear criminal responsibility for specific crimes.

Why objectivity (20): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'genocide,' 'catastrophe,' and 'rogue state' to frame Israel negatively. It presents a one-sided narrative that blames the West for enabling Israel's actions and portrays the ICC arrest warrants as a punishment for protecting Netanyahu, which is

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories