ON
← Back to feed
French Constitutional Council suspends ban on social media access for under-15s
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter8 days ago

French Constitutional Council suspends ban on social media access for under-15s

The French Constitutional Council has annulled a law that would have banned social media access for children under 15 years old. The council ruled that the law, supported by President Emmanuel Macron, disproportionately infringes on freedom of expression and lacks sufficient privacy protections. Macron had previously thanked lawmakers for supporting the legislation and planned to implement it by September. Following the ruling, the Elysee Palace instructed Prime Minister Sebastian Lecornu to prepare a new legally sound draft of the legislation that complies with both the constitutional decision and European regulatory frameworks. The invalidated law proposed a two-step implementation: banning the creation of new social media accounts for those under 15 starting September 1st, and restricting existing accounts from January 1st, 2027. Other countries, including Australia, Austria, Spain, Italy, and Slovenia, have also considered similar restrictions on social media use for minors.

The French Constitutional Council has invalidated a law aimed at banning social media access for individuals under the age of 15, marking a setback for President Emmanuel Macron’s legislative agenda. The law had been passed by the National Assembly in July, with plans to implement the ban starting September 1. However, the Constitutional Council ruled the measure unconstitutional, citing excessive interference with freedom of expression and insufficient safeguards for privacy rights. This decision comes amid growing global efforts to regulate youth access to digital platforms, with several countries having already introduced similar restrictions. The invalidated law would have prohibited children under 15 from creating new accounts on platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat, with existing accounts facing restrictions from January 1, 2027. The Constitutional Council’s ruling specifically highlighted concerns over the lack of clear provisions for verifying users' ages and ensuring compliance with privacy protections. While the law included measures related to limiting phone usage in secondary schools, these were not addressed in the council's decision. President Macron had championed the legislation as part of his broader initiative to protect young people from the potential harms of social media, including issues like attention fragmentation, reduced academic performance, and difficulties in forming peer relationships. He had previously struggled to push through pension reforms during his second term and now faces another challenge in implementing this digital regulation. Following the court’s decision, Macron instructed Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu to draft a revised version of the bill that aligns with constitutional requirements and European regulatory frameworks. The ruling by the Constitutional Council has implications beyond France. Other countries, including Australia, which implemented a ban on social media for those under 16 in December 2025, and Brazil, which introduced strict regulations on youth access to digital platforms since March 2026, have taken similar steps. In Brazil, minors must link their accounts to parental ones, require parental consent for app downloads, and face limitations on features that could lead to dependency. Failure to comply by tech companies risks substantial fines or even service suspension. Meanwhile, in the United States, a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of New Mexico ordered Meta Platforms Inc., owner of Instagram and Facebook, to pay $942 million in damages for its role in harming the mental health of minors. In Europe, discussions around regulating youth access to social media continue. The European Commission’s president, Ursula von der Leyen, has indicated that the EU is preparing a directive to limit young people’s access to online platforms. Several other European nations, including Austria, Spain, Italy, and Slovenia, are also considering similar measures. These developments reflect a broader trend toward balancing digital freedoms with protective measures for younger generations. France’s failed attempt to enact the social media restriction highlights the challenges of reconciling public policy goals with constitutional and legal constraints. Despite the setback, Macron remains committed to advancing the reform, instructing officials to work on a revised proposal that meets both constitutional standards and international regulatory expectations. The government aims to reintroduce the legislation before the spring of next year, ahead of upcoming presidential elections in France. The outcome of this effort will depend on how effectively policymakers can address the concerns raised by the Constitutional Council while maintaining the core objectives of protecting youth from potential digital harms.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 98Objective 909 days ago
There will be no ban on the use of social networks by those under 15 in France yet, that's why

The Constitutional Council of France has ruled that the proposed law, supported by President Emmanuel Macron, disproportionately infringes on freedom of expression and fails to provide adequate privacy protections. The law aimed to prohibit social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram for users under 15 years old in two stages: preventing new account creation starting September 1 and restricting existing accounts from January 1, 2027. Following this decision, Macron expressed his continued determination to implement the reform, instructing Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu to prepare a legally sound version of the bill that complies with both the Constitutional Council’s ruling and European regulatory frameworks.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the constitutional ruling against the proposed law and Macron's response objectively, without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from official sources and does not employ biased language or selective framing.

Why factuality (98): This article provides precise details about the Constitutional Council's rejection of Macron's proposed law, including the specific concerns about free speech and privacy protections. It accurately describes the timeline and the government's response, aligning perfectly with the cross-source consens

Why objectivity (90): The article remains highly objective, presenting facts without editorializing or taking a clear stance. It quotes official statements and avoids emotionally charged language, maintaining a balanced perspective throughout.

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 96Objective 889 days ago
French Constitutional Council suspends ban on social media access for under-15s

The French Constitutional Council has annulled a law that would have banned social media access for children under 15 years old. The council ruled that the law, supported by President Emmanuel Macron, disproportionately infringes on freedom of expression and lacks sufficient privacy protections. Macron had previously thanked lawmakers for supporting the legislation and planned to implement it by September. Following the ruling, the Elysee Palace instructed Prime Minister Sebastian Lecornu to prepare a new legally sound draft of the legislation that complies with both the constitutional decision and European regulatory frameworks. The invalidated law proposed a two-step implementation: banning the creation of new social media accounts for those under 15 starting September 1st, and restricting existing accounts from January 1st, 2027. Other countries, including Australia, Austria, Spain, Italy, and Slovenia, have also considered similar restrictions on social media use for minors.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal challenge and outcome objectively, citing the Constitutional Council’s reasoning and Macron’s response without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from official sources and provides context on international efforts regarding youth internet regulation.

Why factuality (96): The article accurately conveys that the Constitutional Council invalidated the law due to excessive infringement on freedom of expression and insufficient privacy safeguards. It also correctly notes that Macron has ordered the government to prepare a new version of the legislation. Minor discrepanci

Why objectivity (88): The article is mostly neutral but includes slight emphasis on Macron's determination to push forward with the reform, which might subtly favor his position. Otherwise, it presents the information objectively without strong bias.

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 859 days ago
French Constitutional Council suspends ban on social media access for under-15s

The French Constitutional Council has rejected a proposed law that would have banned access to social media platforms for individuals under the age of 15. The council argued that the proposal would infringe on freedom of expression by requiring users to prove their age before accessing certain online services. The law was supported by French lawmakers, making France the first European country to follow Australia’s example, which banned access to platforms like Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube for users under 16. The decision represents a setback for President Emmanuel Macron, who had instructed Prime Minister Édouard Philippe to revise the bill in light of the constitutional council’s concerns. Macron remains determined to pass the reform before the upcoming presidential elections.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the decision of the French Constitutional Council as a rejection of a controversial law, but does not take a clear ideological stance. It reports both the government's intent and the legal challenge, without overtly criticizing either side. The framing is balanced between the 'p

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that France's Constitutional Council rejected a law banning access to social media for those under 15, citing concerns over freedom of expression. It also mentions the law would have required age verification, which was not sufficiently defined. The article aligns clos

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but does include some framing that emphasizes the setback for Macron, which may slightly favor his position. However, it avoids overtly biased language and presents both sides of the issue.

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 94Objective 828 days ago
French constitutional judges overturn ban on social networks for under-15s

The French Constitutional Council has invalidated a law proposed by President Emmanuel Macron that would have banned social media use for those under 15 years old. The law was passed by the National Assembly in July 2023 but was struck down by the Constitutional Council, which argued it violated freedom of expression and privacy rights for young people. The decision did not address other provisions in the law, such as restrictions on phone use in secondary schools. Macron had hoped this legislation would protect children from the negative effects of social media, including reduced attention spans and academic performance issues. Despite the rejection, Macron has instructed his government to draft a new law acceptable to the Constitutional Council. Similar measures have been implemented in Australia, Brazil, and are being considered in the UK and Slovenia.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing both the government’s position and the Constitutional Council’s reasoning. It does not favor one side over the other and includes international comparisons without taking a stance.

Why factuality (94): The article correctly states that the Constitutional Council struck down the law, citing violations of free speech and privacy rights. It also accurately notes that Macron had ordered the government to draft a new bill. Some minor details differ from other sources, such as the mention of Brazil and

Why objectivity (82): The article leans slightly toward emphasizing Macron's failure and the broader international context, which introduces a subtle bias. While it remains largely factual, the tone occasionally suggests a critical view of Macron's efforts.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories