An unusual sight has been reported by swimmers at Velika Čavojnica bay on the island of Vis. They encountered a fence running towards the sea, which was electrified and reached all the way to the water’s edge. The incident was shared on a Facebook group called 'Volim Komižu,' raising questions about local authority over private land and whether this violates maritime law. According to Morski.hr, the area also features a concrete mul (a type of natural formation), prompting concerns about access to coastal areas and the legality of such structures. Local authorities, including municipal officer Andrej Brajčić, were contacted but have not received formal complaints. Brajčić noted that while the area has always been difficult to access, the recent changes raise legal questions that require investigation.
A bizarre sight has shocked beachgoers at Velika Čavojnica Bay on the island of Vis, Croatia. Locals who recently visited the area reported encountering an electrified fence stretching all the way to the sea, effectively blocking access to the public coastal land. According to reports shared on social media, the structure, which stands approximately 1.7 meters high, was installed around a property located within the bay, raising concerns over its legality and safety. The incident came to light after several individuals described their unsettling experience while attempting to swim in the area. They noted that the fence, equipped with live wires, extended from the property into the water, creating a dangerous barrier for swimmers. One participant recounted feeling uneasy upon discovering the installation, particularly because it appeared to encroach upon the public domain. “We were taken aback. There’s a house on the right side of the bay, and I understand someone might want privacy, but can a local sheriff enforce such measures against the law?” they questioned. The situation has sparked debate regarding the ownership and legal status of the land. According to documents obtained by Morski.hr, the property in question belongs to Jan Emiel Constant Fabre, a Belgian national residing in Antwerp. The fence, which also extends onto adjacent land not under his ownership, raises questions about compliance with Croatian maritime laws. Under the Law on Maritime Property and Harbours, public access to coastal areas is protected, and private structures that restrict this access are generally prohibited unless specific concessions have been granted. Local authorities, including the municipal officer Andrej Brajčić, have expressed surprise at the development. He stated that he had not received any formal complaints about the issue and that he had never encountered anything similar during his long tenure. Brajčić mentioned that the land in question had historically belonged to an old noble family, though it had since been sold, leaving the current owner's identity unclear. He added that while the presence of a concrete jetty in the bay was known, the extent of its expansion remained uncertain. The legal implications of the fence are clear. The Law on Maritime Property explicitly prohibits the fencing off of public coastal areas and any other restrictions on their general use. The installation of live wires poses additional risks, potentially violating both safety regulations and legal frameworks governing public spaces. Authorities have confirmed that the case will be reported to the police, as the situation appears to contravene established norms. Residents and visitors alike have voiced their concerns, emphasizing the need for transparency and adherence to legal standards. Some have speculated that the property may have changed hands, leading to unauthorized modifications. Others have raised questions about the broader implications of such actions, suggesting that the incident could set a precedent for future disputes over coastal rights. As investigations continue, the focus remains on determining whether the fence infringes upon public access and whether it complies with existing laws. The outcome of this case may influence how similar situations are handled in the future, highlighting the importance of maintaining open access to coastal areas in accordance with legal guidelines.
Advertisement
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
An unusual sight has been reported by swimmers at Velika Čavojnica bay on the island of Vis. They encountered a fence running towards the sea, which was electrified and reached all the way to the water’s edge. The incident was shared on a Facebook group called 'Volim Komižu,' raising questions about local authority over private land and whether this violates maritime law. According to Morski.hr, the area also features a concrete mul (a type of natural formation), prompting concerns about access to coastal areas and the legality of such structures. Local authorities, including municipal officer Andrej Brajčić, were contacted but have not received formal complaints. Brajčić noted that while the area has always been difficult to access, the recent changes raise legal questions that require investigation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the eyewitness account and the official response without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the controversy surrounding the electrified fence and its potential violation of maritime laws, but does not take a clear stance on who is at fault. Instead, it highlights a
A Belgian artist named Jan Emiel Constant Fabre has installed an electrically charged fence around his property in the bay of Vela Čavojnica on the island of Vis, Croatia. The fence extends into neighboring land not owned by Fabre and reaches all the way to the sea, blocking access to the bay. The local municipality of Vis was unaware of this installation until recently and has now sent a communal officer to investigate. According to Croatian maritime law, such fencing is illegal as it restricts public access to coastal areas designated for general use. The community officer expressed surprise at the situation and plans to report the case to the police.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, citing legal provisions, quotes from officials, and includes perspectives from both the property owner and affected citizens. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing.
An article reports on a situation in Croatia where a private residence in the coastal area of Velika Čavojnica on the island of Vis has been fenced off with electric wire, creating a dangerous hazard for visitors. The residents describe being surprised by the fence, which they claim blocks access to the beach and poses a risk due to the live electrical current. They question whether this action is legal and express concerns over local authorities' inaction. The incident has sparked local outrage, with blame directed at a Belgian resident who built the house nearby.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a local issue involving property rights and safety regulations without overtly endorsing any political stance. It highlights community concern and questions legality but does not take a clear ideological position. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the un
An anonymous individual has fenced off the entire beach area of Vela Čavojnica on Vis using electrified wire, preventing public access. Residents who encountered the fence described feeling uneasy, noting that the barrier extends all the way to the sea. According to local regulations, such fencing is illegal, as it restricts public use of maritime property. The installation of electrified fencing violates laws prohibiting obstructions to public access, which could result in fines and immediate removal by authorities. Local authorities have not received complaints about this issue, and the municipal worker Andra Brajčić stated he would report the incident to the police. He noted that the land was previously owned by an old Vis family but has since been sold, though ownership remains unclear.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the unauthorized fencing as a violation of public rights and highlights legal concerns, suggesting a critical stance toward private encroachment on communal spaces. While not overtly political, the emphasis on legal authority and public access aligns with progressive values of公民权利
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.