ON
← Back to feed
Footloose: Chanel’s ‘barefoot shoe’ marks latest chapter in fashion's flirtation with impractical footwear
AE🎭 Culture2 days ago

Footloose: Chanel’s ‘barefoot shoe’ marks latest chapter in fashion's flirtation with impractical footwear

The article discusses Chanel's 'barefoot shoe' introduced during its cruise 2027 collection, highlighting its impractical design and the controversy it sparked. Actress Margaret Qualley wore the shoe at the premiere of Ridley Scott's 'The Dog Stars,' drawing attention to the trend of fashion-forward yet unusable footwear. The piece references past examples like Alexander McQueen's Armadillo heels and Balenciaga's collaboration with Crocs, illustrating a pattern of designers prioritizing aesthetics over functionality. It critiques the broader fashion industry's tendency to create visually striking but impractical shoes, questioning their purpose and appeal.

Chanel’s latest offering, a minimalist, half-sandal dubbed the “barefoot shoe”, has sparked both admiration and bewilderment since its debut at the cruise 2027 show in April. The design, which leaves the front half of the foot exposed, was met with mixed reactions online, though it remained a fixture on the pristine runway. Now, the shoe has taken center stage once more, thanks to actress Margaret Qualley, who wore it during the world premiere of Ridley Scott’s The Dog Stars in London. Qualley paired the shoe with a Chanel dress, drawing attention to the piece’s aesthetic appeal while also highlighting its impracticality. The shoe’s design, cupped at the heel and fastened with two leather straps, exudes charm and elegance. Yet its functionality is questionable. With only the heel protected, the rest of the foot remains vulnerable to dirt and discomfort. This contrast between beauty and utility echoes a recurring trend in fashion, where designers have long experimented with unconventional silhouettes. From Alexander McQueen’s bulbous, 12-inch Armadillo heels in spring 2010 to Gucci’s furry-lined slides in autumn 2015, the industry has consistently embraced designs that prioritize visual impact over wearability. This pattern continues with other notable examples. In spring 2017, Manolo Blahnik crafted high boots for Vetements that reached nearly to the waist, while Balenciaga’s 2018 collaboration with Crocs produced platform foam clogs that blended streetwear with whimsical aesthetics. These creations, though often criticized for their lack of practicality, have nonetheless captured public imagination and media attention. The Chanel shoe, however, stands apart due to its deliberate omission of coverage for the majority of the foot. While some see this as a bold artistic statement, others question its real-world viability. A quick discussion among colleagues raised concerns about how such a shoe might perform in extreme conditions, such as the sweltering heat of Dubai or the bustling streets of New York. One suggested that the shoe could symbolize an elite status, where wealth allows individuals to disregard conventional norms of foot protection. Fashion has always been a reflection of cultural values and societal shifts, and the rise of impractical footwear suggests a growing fascination with spectacle over function. The Chanel shoe, with its minimalist yet provocative design, fits into this broader narrative. It challenges traditional notions of what constitutes a functional shoe, instead positioning itself as a conversation starter or a statement piece. As the shoe gains traction in the public eye, its presence on the red carpet underscores its role as a symbol of both innovation and indulgence. Whether viewed as a daring experiment or a frivolous distraction, the “barefoot shoe” has undeniably made its mark. Its continued visibility in high-profile settings hints at a deeper cultural shift, one where the boundaries between fashion and function continue to blur.

1 reports

The National logoThe NationalParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 702 days ago
Footloose: Chanel’s ‘barefoot shoe’ marks latest chapter in fashion's flirtation with impractical footwear

The article discusses Chanel's 'barefoot shoe' introduced during its cruise 2027 collection, highlighting its impractical design and the controversy it sparked. Actress Margaret Qualley wore the shoe at the premiere of Ridley Scott's 'The Dog Stars,' drawing attention to the trend of fashion-forward yet unusable footwear. The piece references past examples like Alexander McQueen's Armadillo heels and Balenciaga's collaboration with Crocs, illustrating a pattern of designers prioritizing aesthetics over functionality. It critiques the broader fashion industry's tendency to create visually striking but impractical shoes, questioning their purpose and appeal.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral analysis of fashion trends, focusing on design choices and cultural commentary rather than political issues. It does not take a clear ideological stance on the subject matter, instead offering historical context and critical observation without overt bias.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the Chanel 'barefoot shoe' as introduced in the cruise 2027 show and mentions Margaret Qualley wearing it at the premiere of 'The Dog Stars.' It provides historical context by referencing similar impractical footwear from Alexander McQueen and Gucci, which aligns wit

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans slightly toward critique, suggesting that the shoe's beauty disguises its lack of practicality. While not overtly biased, the article frames the shoe as a symbol of fashion's flirtation with impractical designs, which may subtly favor a critical perspective over a purely descriptive o

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories