Several environmental organisations denounce Nordic Mining

AftenpostenIndependent🔒Center4 days ago

The Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment has allowed the continued deposition of mine waste in Førdefjorden by the company Engebø Rutile and Garnet, despite a Supreme Court ruling that previous permits were invalid. The court determined that the 2016 justification for the permit did not meet EU water directive requirements. Despite this, the ministry argues that stopping operations during the processing of a new application would be unreasonable, citing potential negative impacts on jobs and critical resource access. The ministry claims that temporary deposition will not affect environmental conditions in the fjord and that a new permit is likely to align with EU regulations.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the legal challenge to the mining operation and the government’s rationale for allowing continued activity. It includes quotes from the minister and mentions opposition from environmental groups, but does not clearly favor either side. The framing remains balanced between '

AftenpostenIndependent🔒Left5 days ago

Environmental organizations in Norway, including Naturvernforbundet, Natur og Ungdom, and Norske Lakseelver, have filed a complaint against Nordic Mining with the Environmental Criminal Court (Økokrim) for illegal dumping of mining waste into Førdefjorden. This follows a Supreme Court ruling on June 17, 2026, which declared the permit allowing such dumping as unlawful. Despite this decision, Nordic Mining continues the practice. The organizations argue that the pollution threatens the fjord’s ecosystem, with reports indicating significant harm to marine life. In 2015, the Ministry of Climate and Environment granted permission for mining operations in Engebøfjellet, including waste disposal in the fjord. Nordic Mining plans to dump up to 170 million tons of waste over 50 years, prompting legal challenges from environmental groups. While Oslo District Court upheld the state’s position, the Borgarting Court ruled in favor of the environmental organizations. Additionally, the European Environment Agency (Esa) has formally opened a case against Norway under the Water Framework Directive related to this issue.

Bias read (Left): The article frames the issue as a conflict between environmental protection and corporate interests, emphasizing the illegality of continued dumping despite judicial rulings. It highlights the stance of environmental organizations and criticizes the government and Nordic Mining for disregarding the法