ON
← Back to feed
Angie Nixon compares ICE agents to 'modern-day slave catchers'
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservativesyesterday

Angie Nixon compares ICE agents to 'modern-day slave catchers'

Florida Democratic Senate candidate Angie Nixon has labeled Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents as 'modern-day slave catchers' and described the agency as a 'paramilitary force,' advocating for its abolition. As she campaigns against Republican Senator Ashley Moody, Nixon has consistently criticized ICE, accusing it of racial profiling, using excessive force, and operating without transparency. Her rhetoric includes claims that ICE targets immigrants and that aggressive enforcement could lead to violent confrontations in Florida, particularly under the state's 'stand your ground' law. Republicans, including RNC spokeswoman Emma Hall, have condemned her remarks, accusing her of vilifying law enforcement and promoting mass amnesty. Immigration enforcement remains a contentious political issue in Florida and nationwide.

Florida Democrat Senate candidate Angie Nixon has drawn sharp criticism for her inflammatory rhetoric toward Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), labeling its agents as “modern-day slave catchers” and describing enforcement actions as “state-sanctioned violence.” The remarks come amid her campaign against incumbent Senator Ashley Moody (R-FL), with Nixon positioning herself as a staunch advocate for dismantling ICE as part of her broader progressive agenda. In recent posts and public statements, Nixon has used strong language to describe ICE officers, referring to them as “THUGS” and “kidnappers.” She has likened immigration detention centers to a “modern day concentration camp” and has called for the complete abolition of the agency. These comments were amplified during a recent interview clip shared by RNC Research, where Nixon claimed that Republican lawmakers are “literally trying to kill us” through their support of ICE enforcement policies. Nixon’s stance reflects her alignment with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which advocates for systemic change and the dismantling of institutions deemed oppressive. She argues that ICE functions as a “paramilitary force” that “terrorizes our neighborhoods” and operates outside the bounds of accountability. Her rhetoric suggests a deep skepticism of federal immigration policy, particularly regarding the treatment of undocumented individuals and the role of law enforcement in enforcing immigration laws. In a statement to Breitbart News, an RNC spokeswoman criticized Nixon’s views, calling her a “socialist nut job” who equates law enforcement with “kidnappers” and “thugs.” The spokesperson highlighted that Nixon seeks to dismantle an agency responsible for apprehending dangerous individuals, including murderers, child predators, drug dealers, and violent criminal illegal aliens. According to the statement, Floridians deserve safety, but Nixon’s position threatens that security by advocating for the abolition of ICE and potentially granting mass amnesty to undocumented residents. Among the individuals Nixon has cited as potential beneficiaries of such a policy are several undocumented immigrants convicted of serious crimes. On August 19, ICE issued a detainer against Shaquiel Sheldon Williams, an illegal alien from Jamaica, who was charged with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon after allegedly stabbing two Burger King employees in Panama City Beach following a dispute over payment. Antonio Cordova-Sajic, an illegal alien from Guatemala, was convicted of lewd or lascivious conduct in Fort Myers. Victor Hugo Casillo-Vallejo, an illegal alien from the Dominican Republic, faced charges in Tampa related to robbery with a firearm, aiding and abetting Hobbs Act robbery, and assisting in the use of a firearm in a crime of violence. Nixon has also expressed concerns about racial profiling by ICE agents, suggesting that Black Americans could be targeted due to their historical ties to slavery. She warned that such profiling could lead to fatal encounters, stating that “they are going to racially profile us and they are going to escalate things and they are going to shoot and kill us.” She emphasized that her goal is to investigate and hold accountable those she calls “bad actors,” ultimately seeking their arrest and imprisonment. Her comments have sparked controversy within both political and law enforcement circles, with critics accusing her of undermining public safety and promoting radical ideologies under the guise of social justice. As the election approaches, Nixon’s stance on ICE will likely remain a focal point of debate, shaping perceptions of her candidacy and the broader political landscape in Florida.

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 302 days ago
FL DSA Candidate Angie Nixon Compares ICE Agents to ‘Modern-Day Slave Catchers,’ Calls Enforcement ‘State-Sanctioned Violence’

Florida Democrat Senate candidate Angie Nixon, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), has criticized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) using strong language, referring to agents as 'THUGS,' 'kidnappers,' and 'modern-day slave catchers.' She has likened immigration detention facilities to 'modern-day concentration camps' and argues that ICE should be abolished, claiming it engages in 'state-sanctioned violence' and racial profiling. Nixon has suggested that ICE agents could be shot in Florida’s 'stand your ground' law state and claims Republicans are 'literally trying to kill us.' These remarks have been highlighted by conservative outlets like RNC Research, which labels her a 'socialist nut job.'

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Nixon's criticisms of ICE as extreme and politically motivated, using terms like 'THUGS,' 'kidnappers,' and 'modern-day slave catchers,' which carry strong ideological connotations. The emphasis on her socialist affiliations and the portrayal of Republican opposition as 'trying to

Why factuality (50): The article discusses Florida Senator candidate Angie Nixon’s criticisms of ICE but does not address the specific event involving Shaquiel Sheldon Williams. It contains no factual information about the incident, the suspect, or the Biden administration’s role. Therefore, it cannot be judged for fact

Why objectivity (30): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'THUGS,' 'kidnappers,' 'modern-day concentration camp,' and 'state-sanctioned violence.' These terms are highly biased and do not present a neutral account of the event or the individuals involved.

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedProgressiveyesterday
Angie Nixon compares ICE agents to 'modern-day slave catchers'

Florida Democratic Senate candidate Angie Nixon has labeled Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents as 'modern-day slave catchers' and described the agency as a 'paramilitary force,' advocating for its abolition. As she campaigns against Republican Senator Ashley Moody, Nixon has consistently criticized ICE, accusing it of racial profiling, using excessive force, and operating without transparency. Her rhetoric includes claims that ICE targets immigrants and that aggressive enforcement could lead to violent confrontations in Florida, particularly under the state's 'stand your ground' law. Republicans, including RNC spokeswoman Emma Hall, have condemned her remarks, accusing her of vilifying law enforcement and promoting mass amnesty. Immigration enforcement remains a contentious political issue in Florida and nationwide.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Angie Nixon's criticisms of ICE as extreme and inflammatory, emphasizing her radical stance and alignment with progressive groups like the Democratic Socialists of America. The language used ('modern-day slave catchers', 'paramilitary force', 'racial profiling') carries strong ant

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories