ON
← Back to feed
Five years, millions of dollars: The battle to fix a defective Sydney building
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter

Five years, millions of dollars: The battle to fix a defective Sydney building

The Sydney Morning Herald reports on the ongoing struggle faced by residents of a defective residential building in Baulkham Hills, Australia. The building, originally named Modena, was developed by Hills Shoppingtown Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of the now-defunct Dyldam Group, which collapsed with debts of half a billion dollars. Residents like Andrew and Lisa Cook moved into their apartments in late 2020, only to discover serious structural issues shortly thereafter, including hazards labeled as threats to human life. Over the past five years, millions of dollars have been spent to repair these defects, with some residents living in temporary accommodations during the process. The article highlights the broader issue of defective housing in New South Wales, noting similar problems with other developers such as Bathla Group.

Five years, millions of dollars: The battle to fix a defective Sydney building Andrew and Lisa Cook moved into their new apartment in Baulkham Hills on December 12, 2020, expecting a modern lifestyle with a sprawling balcony offering views of the city skyline and proximity to shops. Just 23 days later, their dream turned into a nightmare when the company developing their building, Hills Shoppingtown Pty Ltd, collapsed. Ten months after that, the New South Wales building regulator identified serious defects in the development, including one deemed a “hazard to human life.” The Cooks were shocked and unsure who would be responsible for repairs. “We were a bit scared because they didn’t know what was going to happen at the time,” Lisa said. Known as the Modena, the four-tower project was developed by Hills Shoppingtown Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Dyldam Group, once one of NSW’s largest apartment builders before collapsing with debts exceeding half a billion dollars. The development included 230 apartments and plans for a retail precinct, aiming to blend luxury with comfort. However, inspections revealed the site was far from the envisioned vision. Non-compliant waterproofing, an awning in danger of collapse, balconies lacking proper water overflows, and a rusted, leaning glass elevator were among the issues uncovered during visits by receivers and regulators. Over five years, the Cooks and a small group of other residents have lived in a construction zone as millions of dollars were spent addressing defects. The scale of the work has been so extensive that the couple has resided in another unit since January while repairs continue on their own apartment. “There’s been a lot of noise for quite a few years, so that’s sort of a bad thing, but I keep thinking they’re doing it, they’re fixing it, it’s not costing us any money,” Andrew said. The Baulkham Hills building, previously called the Modena, remains under active repair. The stairs to the lower level are still fenced off, indicating ongoing work. Residents describe themselves as “one of the fortunate buildings in Sydney,” though buying a home with defects is not unusual in NSW. The Building Commission NSW recently ordered major developer Bathla Group, which entered voluntary administration last month, to address serious defects in two of its projects. This has left buyers uncertain whether they will ever move into their homes. The $70 million fix When McGrathNicol was appointed receiver of the Modena development in 2021, partner Jason Ireland said they were told the project was 95 percent complete. However, what was expected to be a straightforward task evolved into a massive undertaking requiring years and $70 million to correct defects, raising the total completion cost of the development to $185 million. Ireland described the project as akin to an onion, noting that peeling back layers revealed more problems. Over 60 defects were identified across the four buildings. Fixing overflow holes in balconies initially seemed simple. But as tiles were removed, a new issue emerged: no one could determine what waterproofing material had been used. Ireland confirmed it was a non-compliant product. “We eventually got to the conclusion that the only way to actually get the sign-off in the end was to rip up the balconies, replace all of the waterproofing, and replace all of the tiling, which is a lot because there’s over 200 apartments,” he said. Throughout this period, the four buildings have remained partially occupied. A process resembling Tetris has required residents to be relocated frequently as work progresses.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 80
Five years, millions of dollars: The battle to fix a defective Sydney building

The article discusses the ongoing issues with a defective residential building in Baulkham Hills, Sydney, originally named the Modena. Developed by Hills Shoppingtown Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of the now-defunct Dyldam Group, the building has faced severe structural and safety problems, including hazardous waterproofing failures, unstable awnings, faulty balconies, and a rusted elevator. Residents like Andrew and Lisa Cook have endured years of uncertainty and disruption as repairs continue, with some having to relocate temporarily. The total repair costs have reached $70 million, raising questions about accountability and responsibility when developers go bankrupt. Similar issues have emerged across New South Wales, highlighting broader concerns about defective housing projects.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a building defect crisis involving multiple stakeholders, including developers, regulators, and residents. While it highlights systemic issues in construction oversight and accountability, it does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or o

Why factuality (85): This article closely mirrors the first in content and structure, reporting the same facts about the Cooks' situation, the developer's collapse, and the regulatory findings. It maintains consistency with the cross-source consensus and includes similar details about the building's defects and the ongo

Why objectivity (80): Similar to the first article, this piece uses emotionally charged language to describe the Cooks' experience, particularly their fear and uncertainty. While informative, this may introduce a slight bias in tone, affecting overall objectivity.

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 80
Five years, millions of dollars: The battle to fix a defective Sydney building

The Sydney Morning Herald reports on the ongoing struggle faced by residents of a defective residential building in Baulkham Hills, Australia. The building, originally named Modena, was developed by Hills Shoppingtown Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of the now-defunct Dyldam Group, which collapsed with debts of half a billion dollars. Residents like Andrew and Lisa Cook moved into their apartments in late 2020, only to discover serious structural issues shortly thereafter, including hazards labeled as threats to human life. Over the past five years, millions of dollars have been spent to repair these defects, with some residents living in temporary accommodations during the process. The article highlights the broader issue of defective housing in New South Wales, noting similar problems with other developers such as Bathla Group.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation without overtly favoring any particular side. It includes quotes from affected residents, details about the developer's financial troubles, and mentions regulatory actions taken by authorities. There is no clear ideological slant in the tone,措

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the Cook family's experience with the defective building, aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the developer's collapse and regulatory findings, and accurately reports the timeline and issues involved. It references specific details like th

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains largely neutral, focusing on the residents' experiences and the broader implications of the building defects. However, there is some emotional language when describing the Cooks' fear and uncertainty, which may slightly reduce objectivity.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories