ON
← Back to feed
US prosecutors sue Amazon for "manipulating" its system of collecting from advertisers
Spain🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9/1/2026

US prosecutors sue Amazon for "manipulating" its system of collecting from advertisers

A coalition of 21 states and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against Amazon, accusing the company of secretly and systematically manipulating its ad pricing system on its website. The complaint alleges that Amazon’s hidden surcharges likely allowed the company to illegally extract over $20 billion from advertising clients who were unaware of the situation. The coalition claims this manipulation led to higher ad prices, which in turn increased product costs for consumers. New York Attorney General Letitia James stated that Amazon began altering auction prices in 2018 by submitting fake second-place bids to charge advertisers more than they should have paid. The investigation also revealed price increases during special shopping days like Black Friday and Prime Day. The lawsuit argues that Amazon violated federal and state consumer protection laws, including those prohibiting deceptive practices.

A coalition of 21 U.S. states and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against Amazon, accusing the company of secretly manipulating its ad pricing system to charge advertisers more than they should have paid. The legal action alleges that Amazon systematically altered how it sets prices for ads on its platform, potentially extracting over $20 billion from more than 1.2 million clients, including small and medium-sized businesses. According to the complaint, these practices likely led to higher product prices for consumers. The lawsuit was announced on Monday and centers around internal documents that describe so-called “hidden fees” used by Amazon. These documents suggest that the company’s method of determining ad costs involved submitting false second-place bids during auctions, allowing Amazon to inflate the prices advertisers were required to pay. The FTC and the states argue that this manipulation violated federal and state consumer protection laws, including provisions that prohibit unfair and deceptive business practices and false advertising. According to the complaint, Amazon claims that ad prices are set through an auction process where potential advertisers submit anonymous bids based on their willingness to pay and the relevance of their offerings. Once a winning bid is selected, the advertiser would typically pay just one cent more than the next highest bid. However, the investigation revealed that starting in 2018, Amazon allegedly began altering these auctions by introducing fake second-place bids. This tactic allowed the company to charge advertisers significantly more than the actual market rate. The allegations include instances where Amazon increased ad prices during special shopping days such as Black Friday and Prime Day, an annual online shopping event created by the company itself. These periods saw particularly aggressive price hikes, according to the coalition of states and the FTC. The lawsuit highlights that these actions occurred despite Amazon’s public assurances that its ad pricing mechanism operated transparently and fairly. New York Attorney General Letitia James stated in a press release that the investigation uncovered evidence suggesting Amazon’s manipulation of ad pricing had a direct impact on consumers. She noted that the increased cost of advertising could lead to higher product prices for shoppers. James emphasized that the practice of artificially inflating ad costs undermines fair competition and harms both businesses and consumers. The FTC confirmed the lawsuit after initially reporting the story, with The Wall Street Journal revealing that 22 states had joined the effort. The agency and the states argue that Amazon’s actions constitute a violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits deceptive and unfair trade practices. They also claim that the company engaged in misleading advertising by presenting its ad pricing model as competitive and transparent while secretly manipulating the system to extract additional revenue. Amazon has not yet publicly responded to the allegations, though the company has previously denied similar claims in the past. Legal experts suggest that the case could take years to resolve, given the complexity of digital advertising systems and the volume of data involved. If found guilty, Amazon could face substantial fines and be forced to change its ad pricing mechanisms. The lawsuit comes amid growing scrutiny of large technology companies regarding their business practices, particularly concerning how they handle advertising and data privacy. Similar investigations have been launched against other major platforms, signaling a broader regulatory push to ensure transparency and fairness in digital markets. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future enforcement actions against tech firms.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

El Mundo logoEl MundoIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 759/1/2026
US prosecutors sue Amazon for "manipulating" its system of collecting from advertisers

A coalition of 21 states and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against Amazon, accusing the company of secretly and systematically manipulating its ad pricing system on its website. The complaint alleges that Amazon’s hidden surcharges likely allowed the company to illegally extract over $20 billion from advertising clients who were unaware of the situation. The coalition claims this manipulation led to higher ad prices, which in turn increased product costs for consumers. New York Attorney General Letitia James stated that Amazon began altering auction prices in 2018 by submitting fake second-place bids to charge advertisers more than they should have paid. The investigation also revealed price increases during special shopping days like Black Friday and Prime Day. The lawsuit argues that Amazon violated federal and state consumer protection laws, including those prohibiting deceptive practices.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a violation of consumer rights and highlights systemic manipulation by a major corporation, aligning with progressive concerns about corporate accountability and market fairness. While the legal accusations are presented factually, the emphasis on consumer harm and 'f

Why factuality (85): This article provides detailed information about the lawsuit, including the alleged $20 billion in lost revenue and the method of secret price manipulation starting in 2018. These specifics align with the broader narrative from multiple sources, though the exact figures may not be independently veri

Why objectivity (75): While the article presents the facts clearly, it includes quotes from Letitia James, the New York attorney general, which introduces a potential bias. The language used ('manipular', 'extraer ilegalmente') carries a somewhat accusatory tone, which slightly reduces objectivity.

El País logoEl PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 808/31/2026
The US Federal Trade Commission is suing Amazon for manipulating the prices of ads on its platform

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against Amazon, alleging that the e-commerce giant manipulated advertising prices on its platform, misleading businesses that placed ads. This information was first reported by The Wall Street Journal and later confirmed by the FTC, which stated that 22 states have joined the lawsuit. The claim suggests that Amazon may have engaged in deceptive practices related to how it sets advertising rates, potentially violating consumer protection laws.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a legal action taken by the FTC, a regulatory body, against a major corporation. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the allegations made by the FTC and the involvementof

Why factuality (75): The article reports that the FTC has sued Amazon for allegedly manipulating ad pricing, as confirmed by The Wall Street Journal. It mentions that 22 states have joined the lawsuit, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, specific details like the exact amount of money involved or the time

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the allegations against Amazon neutrally, citing statements from both the FTC and state attorneys general. It avoids taking sides and focuses on reporting the legal action and its implications, maintaining a balanced tone.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories