ON
← Back to feed
Will the hospitals be able to balance business?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter12 days ago

Will the hospitals be able to balance business?

The article discusses financial challenges faced by public hospitals in Slovenia, particularly highlighting a significant budget deficit in the first half of 2026. The Ministry of Health has called for hospital management to prepare stabilization plans by the end of August, warning that without additional measures, the overall deficit could reach between 80 and 100 million euros by year-end. According to the Slovenian Association of Healthcare Institutions, the main causes of poor financial results are the wage reform and the reduction in healthcare service prices. The 2026 regulation on mandatory health insurance services, introduced by the previous government, reduced prices by 1% which led to increased deficits. While some hospitals are actively preparing stabilization plans, the association notes limited potential for cost rationalization due to unaccounted inflation over the past four years.

The Ministry of Health in Slovenia has completed its handover process, revealing a comprehensive assessment of both its operational and financial status under the new mandate led by Minister Dr. Tadej Ostrc. The minister presented findings indicating a baseline for evaluating the success of future measures. During the review, multiple open procedures before the European Commission and the Court of Justice of the European Union were identified, including one concerning the regulation of pharmacy activities. The ministry has already submitted responses to the European Commission and committed to preparing necessary legislative changes to prevent further proceedings and potential financial consequences for Slovenia. Delays in accessing European funds have been highlighted in the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Plan (European funds). Analysis indicates that due to delays and procedural inconsistencies in the project for a new Infectious Diseases Clinic, it will not be possible to fully access the planned European funds. Instead of the anticipated approximately 55 million euros, current estimates suggest around 35 million euros can be accessed, which is 20 million euros less than originally planned. Significant delays in implementing legislation have also been noted. The ministry identified substantial shortcomings in the execution of legislation, with only six of the 20 planned subordinate acts for implementing the Healthcare Activities Act having been adopted. As a result, parts of the law cannot be fully implemented in practice. More than a year has passed since extraordinary professional inspections ceased due to legislative changes, prompting the ministry to begin establishing conditions for their resumption. The most pressing challenge is the financial situation. Upon taking over, the ministry discovered a discrepancy of approximately 200 million euros between assumed obligations and allocated budget resources. Part of this shortfall stems from insufficient funding for obligations towards the Slovenian Health Insurance Institute (ZZZS), while another portion arises from the difference between assumed obligations and available resources per individual budget item. Public hospitals have incurred losses, with the ministry reporting that public hospitals generated a loss of 21.7 million euros in the first five months of this year. If trends remain unchanged and no additional measures are taken, the total deficit could reach between 80 and 100 million euros by the end of the year. Consequently, the ministry will request the management of public healthcare institutions to prepare stabilization plans to stabilize operations, while also reviewing criteria for paying performance-based bonuses to hospital management. A threefold increase in funding for non-governmental organizations and societies has also been observed. Funding for these entities has risen from approximately four to over 12 million euros annually in recent years. The ministry will examine the effectiveness, purposefulness, and transparency of the expenditure of these funds. Requests for specific information regarding which non-governmental organizations received increased funding were met with instructions to submit such requests according to the Access to Public Information Act. These requests have been sent, and once responses are received, they will be published. On the increased funding for non-governmental organizations, Dr. Rok Ravnikar, a physician on social media, pointed out that 12 million euros is equivalent to the annual cost of 50 family medicine clinics. These would serve 100,000 patients throughout the year. He explained that one family medicine clinic, with all staff, costs and services covered by the Slovenian Health Insurance Institute, amounts to 240,000 euros annually. He expressed frustration upon reading figures distributed through numerous tenders for unspecified purposes, often in tens of thousands of euros. He described the applications and reports as frequently enriched with references in the style of LinkedIn and AI-generated reports on successful projects, while he imagines the actual applications and reports filled with such descriptions.

2 reports

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 8012 days ago
Will the hospitals be able to balance business?

The article discusses financial challenges faced by public hospitals in Slovenia, particularly highlighting a significant budget deficit in the first half of 2026. The Ministry of Health has called for hospital management to prepare stabilization plans by the end of August, warning that without additional measures, the overall deficit could reach between 80 and 100 million euros by year-end. According to the Slovenian Association of Healthcare Institutions, the main causes of poor financial results are the wage reform and the reduction in healthcare service prices. The 2026 regulation on mandatory health insurance services, introduced by the previous government, reduced prices by 1% which led to increased deficits. While some hospitals are actively preparing stabilization plans, the association notes limited potential for cost rationalization due to unaccounted inflation over the past four years.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from both the Ministry of Health and the Slovenian Association of Healthcare Institutions without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the financial situation of public hospitals, the reasons behind their deficits, and the responses from both governmental and

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the financial challenges faced by public hospitals in Slovenia, citing the payment reform and reduced healthcare service prices as main causes. It references official data from the Ministry of Health regarding the budget deficit and quotes statements from Minister Tadej Ostrc.

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the situation in a neutral manner, reporting facts and quotes from officials without apparent bias. It provides context about the financial issues and the government's response, but uses slightly emotive language like 'slabe poslovne rezultate' (poor business results) which may

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 7013 days ago
Financial hole also in the Ministry of Health

The article reports on financial challenges faced by Slovenia's Ministry of Health. It outlines several issues including delays in accessing European Union funds due to procedural inefficiencies, significant budget shortfalls amounting to approximately 200 million euros, and substantial losses reported by public hospitals. The ministry has acknowledged these problems and plans to request corrective action from hospital management. Additionally, there has been a notable increase in funding for non-governmental organizations and associations, which the ministry intends to review for effectiveness and transparency.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding the Ministry of Health's financial situation without overtly favoring any particular political stance. While the content highlights administrative and fiscal challenges, it does not exhibit clear ideological bias or one-sided emphasis. The reporting

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a ministerial report regarding financial discrepancies and administrative issues within the Ministry of Health. It cites specific figures such as the 200 million EUR gap and mentions the European Commission's involvement. While there is no primary source, the information align

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans slightly towards highlighting administrative shortcomings, particularly the 200 million EUR financial gap. While not overtly biased, the emphasis on these challenges may reflect a narrative commonly used in political discourse to critique governance efficiency.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories