The Italian football club Juventus has entered into a settlement agreement with UEFA following violations of the financial fair play regulations. This agreement comes after the club exceeded the allowed limits set by UEFA's "football earnings rule," which permits a maximum aggregate loss of 60 million euros over a three-year period. Between the 2022-23 season and the 2024-25 season, Juventus recorded an aggregated loss of 381 million euros, largely due to its exclusion from European competitions during the 2023-24 season, which resulted in a deficit of 199 million euros. As part of the settlement, Juventus will face a fixed fine of six million euros, payable in the 2025-26 fiscal year. Additionally, there is a potential risk of an additional 14 million euros in fines, contingent upon whether the club meets certain intermediate financial targets agreed upon with UEFA.
The settlement agreement spans three years, ending with the fiscal year 2027-28. During this time, Juventus must demonstrate progressive improvement in its financial performance until it fully complies with UEFA’s regulations by the end of the 2028-29 season. The club asserts that it believes it can meet these parameters with sufficient margin and thus avoid the additional penalties. If the club achieves full compliance before the end of the settlement period, it could potentially exit the agreement early.
In addition to financial sanctions, Juventus faces sporting restrictions related to the UEFA list. Specifically, the club must submit a list for the Europa League in August with a total cost—comprising wages, amortizations, and other expenses—that is at least one euro lower than the list submitted in February of this year. Despite these constraints, Juventus remains confident in its ability to manage its finances effectively. The expiration of the contract with striker Dušan Vlahović is expected to reduce costs by approximately 40 million euros, combining salary and amortization savings. Further reductions in spending are anticipated between the 2026-27 seasons, aiming for a decrease of 5 to 10 percent compared to current levels.
Juventus also plans to capitalize on players whose market value significantly exceeds their book value. Players such as Brecht Dejaegher, Federico Chiesa, Matteo Gabbani, Alessandro Gatti, and Lorenzo Miretti are considered candidates for transfer deals aimed at generating up to 100 million euros in revenue. These funds would help compensate for missed Champions League prize money and support future recruitment efforts.
Other Italian clubs have also faced sanctions from UEFA. Fiorentina was fined six million euros for exceeding the 70 percent threshold in the ratio between revenues and team costs. Similarly, Bologna and Napoli had ratios above 70 percent but avoided sanctions by offsetting them with surpluses from previous balance sheets. The Juventus Club confirmed that it met the "team cost ratio" requirements as of December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2025, thanks to cost-cutting measures implemented in recent fiscal periods.
Meanwhile, another Italian club, AS Roma, finds itself in a precarious position regarding the financial fair play rules. The club is likely to breach the required parameters and face sanctions unless it manages to sell key players within a tight deadline. Among the potential transfers is the forward Alejandro Soulé, who has attracted interest from several clubs, including teams in Germany and the Saudi Pro League, offering amounts potentially exceeding 35 million euros. However, closing such a deal within the limited timeframe poses significant challenges. The club has opted to wait rather than hastily sell a player, acknowledging that while the sanctions might not be extremely severe, they could still have notable implications. The situation will become clearer in the coming days, influencing the club's approach to incoming transfers and contract renewals for players like Paulo Dybala and Eljif Elmas.
4 reports
OpenIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 853 days ago The fine for Juve after the agreement with UEFA, the budget rules and the market: what changes for the next three yearsThe Juventus football club has reached a settlement agreement with UEFA regarding financial fair play violations. Over the three-year period from 2022-23 to 2024-25, Juventus accumulated a total loss of 381 million euros, largely due to exclusion from European competitions during the 2023-24 season. The agreement imposes a fixed fine of 6 million euros to be recorded in the 2025-26 financial year, with additional penalties of up to 14 million euros if intermediate targets are not met. Juventus must also reduce the total salary and amortization costs of players registered for the Europa League by at least one euro compared to February’s submission. The club believes it can meet these requirements with sufficient margin and potentially exit the agreement early if finances allow. Meanwhile, the Fiorentina club was also fined 6 million euros by UEFA.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses sports-related financial regulations and sanctions imposed by UEFA on football clubs. It provides factual information about the financial situation of Juventus and other Italian teams without showing any ideological or political bias. The content focuses purely on sports and is
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): This article provides a comprehensive overview of the settlement agreement, matching the cross-source consensus on the 6 million fine, potential 14 million additional fine, and the three-year agreement. It also references the impact of the 2023-24 season on finances. The tone is objective and inform
Il GiornaleParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 803 days ago The fine, the budgetary knot and the limits to the rose: what the Juve-Uefa agreement on Financial Fair Play envisagesThe article reports that Juventus has entered into a settlement agreement with UEFA after violating the Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules. The club was fined 20 million euros, with 6 million as an unconditional sanction and up to 14 million conditional, depending on meeting agreed targets. Additionally, there will be restrictions on their European squad list, requiring them to submit a lower-cost roster for the Europa League. Over the past three seasons (2022-23 to 2024-25), Juventus reported a cumulative loss of 381 million euros, exceeding the maximum allowed loss threshold of 60 million euros. The 2023-24 season, marked by exclusion from European competitions, contributed significantly to this deficit. The club plans to reduce costs further by 5-10% in the 2026-27 season through contract exits and potential transfers of players with low financial value. Juventus expects to meet the required financial parameters within the next few years and avoid additional penalties.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Juventus' financial situation and its implications under UEFA regulations without overtly favoring any political ideology. It provides balanced reporting on the sanctions, financial constraints, and the club’s strategic responses without leaning toward左
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports the settlement agreement between Juventus and UEFA, including the 6 million unconditional fine and potential 14 million conditional fine. It also mentions the restrictions on the European squad list. However, it lacks some details from other sources like the exact time
Il Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 853 days ago Juventus fined by UEFA for failing to comply with financial fair play: it will be subject to a settsettlement agreement for 3 yearsThe Italian football club Juventus has reached a settlement agreement with UEFA after violating financial fair play regulations. The club will pay an immediate fine of six million euros and enter into a three-year settlement period during which it must meet specific financial targets. Failure to comply could result in an additional 14 million euros in fines by the end of the 2028/29 season. In addition to Juventus, Fiorentina was fined six million euros for exceeding the 70% revenue-to-cost ratio threshold. Bologna and Napoli had similar issues but were able to offset their excess through previous budget surpluses.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a sports-related financial penalty imposed by UEFA on a football club, focusing on financial regulations within the sport. There is no political framing, bias, or commentary on broader political issues. The content is purely informational and neutral in tone.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 85): The article accurately describes the settlement agreement and the 6 million fine, aligning with other sources. It also mentions the Fiorentina sanction as an example. However, it shifts focus to Roma’s situation later, which may confuse readers. The overall tone remains neutral and factual.
Il Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 754 days ago Financial Fair Play, Rome is ready to accept a sanction in order not to sell Soulé: here's whyThe article discusses AS Roma's potential financial penalties under UEFA's Financial Fair Play regulations due to ongoing financial imbalances. With less than 24 hours remaining to meet the required financial thresholds, Roma faces possible sanctions, including restrictions on squad lists or exclusion from European competitions. The club has been managing its finances through player sales, but these efforts have not fully resolved the issue. A potential sale of striker Soule could provide significant funds, though the deal must be finalized quickly. Roma appears ready to accept a sanction rather than sell Soule, which would impact their transfer strategy.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation of AS Roma and the potential financial consequences under UEFA rules without overtly criticizing or praising the club’s decisions. It provides factual information about the financial challenges, the possible solutions, and the implications of different choices, but
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 75): This article starts with the Roma situation, which is less relevant to the main topic. While it explains the general rules of Financial Fair Play, it becomes less focused on Juventus and includes speculative language about Roma’s possible sanctions. The information is somewhat outdated and less alig
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter