ON
← Back to feed
In the capital, a robbery in broad daylight: a suitcase with money taken, security guards firing (PHOTO)
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 days ago

In the capital, a robbery in broad daylight: a suitcase with money taken, security guards firing (PHOTO)

Around 12:30 PM, two unknown armed individuals attacked two security guards at a shopping area in Zagreb, threatening them with firearms and stealing a money pouch meant for cash transportation. During the robbery, the guards used their weapons to shoot at the attackers, who then fled the scene. According to initial police reports, no one was injured during the incident. The police were immediately alerted and arrived at the location to conduct a crime scene investigation and launched an intensive search for the armed perpetrators, who remained at large. The event occurred in one of Zagreb’s larger shopping areas during the day, when there were many people present, making the fact that no one was harmed particularly unusual. It is still unclear whether the attackers acted alone or if they had accomplices waiting after the attack. Investigations and searches for the suspects continue.

The Slovenian district public prosecutor has dismissed criminal charges against two security guards employed by the Janković family's protection service, citing insufficient evidence to support claims that they committed the alleged crime of violence. According to the decision issued by the District Public Prosecutor’s Office, the charges against Vahidin Mehmedović were dropped because there was no substantiated basis to believe he had committed the alleged violent act. The incident reportedly occurred on March 27 this year when police were alerted by the security firm Alpha Protection, d.o.o., that two individuals had entered the secured area near the Stožič construction site of the CO project, causing disturbances, taking photos, and challenging the guards. According to the police report from the Bežigrad station, officers arrived at the scene and found Uroš Jernejc and his cousin Simon Jernejc at the construction site. Police noted that Simon appeared visibly injured, particularly around his head. The guards allegedly used force against both men during their removal from the site. Uroš Jernejc described how he approached the location near the Hipodrom Stožica and began photographing the construction equipment and workers as evidence. He then went to his plot and questioned one of the workers about who was leading the construction site. When the worker responded that it was him, Uroš asked why they were on his land and demanded they remove the machinery. The worker called the security personnel, who approached Uroš and ordered him to leave the area. Two of them grabbed him by each arm while a third, identified as Vahidin Mehmedović, struck Uroš in the face with a fist. Mehmedović also took Uroš's mobile phone from his hand, causing him to fall to the ground. At some point, Uroš himself ended up on the floor, and one of the security guards pressed him down before lifting him back up, returning his phone, and escorting him toward the exit of the construction site. Uroš recounted the same account to Domovina. During the escort to the exit, Mehmedović struck Uroš again in the left jaw and removed his corrective glasses before hitting him in the right eye. Meanwhile, Simon Jernejc arrived at the scene and started recording the incident. Security personnel noticed him filming and approached him. Mehmedović grabbed Simon by the hair and pushed him to the ground. He attempted to take Simon's phone but failed until four more security guards arrived. Mehmedović then grabbed Simon by the back of the neck and pushed him to the ground, followed by grabbing him from the front and beginning to choke him. Simon lost consciousness within a minute, and the security guards managed to retrieve his phone and delete the recordings. Policemen collected statements from witnesses present at the scene and determined that the company Prenova Gradbenik, d.o.o., had begun work on the CO project that day. The site manager was Damjan Kozelj, and several security firms, including Alpha Protection, Zaščita, Protectiva, and Pro Direkt, were providing security services at the construction site. Alpha Protection had previously been involved in securing the C0 pipeline construction on the Stožič area, where its subcontractor, Valina Service, had also become entangled in a confrontation with landowners. The public prosecutor followed the police investigation and believed the accounts given by the Janković family's security guards. In the case of the incident at the Stožič site, where construction had begun based on the controversial eighth building permit for the C0 pipeline (a case still pending legal review, with the non-governmental organization Alpe-Adria-Green having filed a lawsuit against the European Union in Ljubljana), security guard Miralem Bešić reportedly warned Uroš Jernejc that he was on restricted property. The incident highlights ongoing tensions between private security companies and local residents over construction projects in the Stožič area. While the charges against the guards have been dismissed, the situation continues to draw attention from both the community and legal authorities. The outcome of the case could influence future interactions between security personnel and civilians in similar situations.

3 reports

Slovenske novice logoSlovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 709 days ago
In the capital, a robbery in broad daylight: a suitcase with money taken, security guards firing (PHOTO)

Around 12:30 PM, two unknown armed individuals attacked two security guards at a shopping area in Zagreb, threatening them with firearms and stealing a money pouch meant for cash transportation. During the robbery, the guards used their weapons to shoot at the attackers, who then fled the scene. According to initial police reports, no one was injured during the incident. The police were immediately alerted and arrived at the location to conduct a crime scene investigation and launched an intensive search for the armed perpetrators, who remained at large. The event occurred in one of Zagreb’s larger shopping areas during the day, when there were many people present, making the fact that no one was harmed particularly unusual. It is still unclear whether the attackers acted alone or if they had accomplices waiting after the attack. Investigations and searches for the suspects continue.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of a robbery involving security personnel and does not exhibit clear ideological framing, loaded language, or biased sourcing. It focuses on the sequence of events and police response without taking a stance or emphasizing any particular political angle.

Why factuality (75): This article provides similar information as the first, confirming the robbery occurred around 12:30 PM, involved armed attackers threatening security guards and stealing a money box. It adds details about police response, ongoing investigation, and the lack of confirmed injuries. While it doesn't o

Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a generally neutral tone but includes commentary on the unusual nature of the event happening during the day in a crowded area, which introduces a slight subjective element. There is also a focus on the police investigation and ongoing search, which may subtly emphasize the ser

Domovina logoDomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 68Objective 4513 days ago
The prosecution has dropped the criminal charges against Jankovic's bodyguards. It was believed that the Jerneys had run into them and fallen to the ground.

The article reports on a criminal complaint against security guards, specifically Vahidin Mehmedović, who were accused of violent behavior during an incident at a construction site in Stožice. The police investigation concluded that there was no substantiated evidence of the alleged criminal act by Mehmedović. According to the report, Uroš and Simon Jernejc, two individuals who had entered the secured area, were physically assaulted by the security personnel. The incident involved multiple instances of physical contact, including being thrown to the ground, having their phones taken, and being restrained. The police gathered information from witnesses present at the scene. The article provides detailed accounts of the confrontation between the individuals and the security guards, highlighting the physical altercation and the subsequent actions taken by both parties.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the incident involving the security guards and the individuals involved, without overtly favoring either side. It includes details from witness accounts and police investigations, maintaining a balanced approach by presenting the sequence of events without明显

Why factuality (68): The article reports on a dismissed criminal complaint against security guard Vahidin Mehmedović based on police report summaries. It provides details from the statements of Uroš and Simon Jernejc, including the incident where Mehmedović allegedly hit Jernejc with a fist. The information aligns with

Why objectivity (45): The tone is highly emotive, using phrases like 'brutalno so ju pretepli' and focusing on the alleged brutality without presenting alternative perspectives. The narrative appears to favor the victims' account while downplaying the legal outcome, showing a clear bias towards the Jernejc family.

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 709 days ago
Film robbery in Zagreb: robber attacks security guards, shots are fired

Two unknown perpetrators attacked security guards at a shopping center in Zagreb around 12:30 PM, threatening them with weapons and stealing a bag containing money, according to Net.hr. The security personnel used firearms during the robbery but reported no injuries. The suspects fled the scene, and the amount stolen remains unknown. An investigation is currently underway.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a criminal incident without taking a political stance. It provides factual information about the robbery, the actions of the security personnel, and the ongoing investigation, without expressing any ideological or partisan perspective.

Why factuality (65): The article reports a robbery at a shopping center in Zagreb where two unknown perpetrators attacked security guards, threatened them with weapons, and stole a money box. It mentions that the guards used firearms during the robbery but no one was injured. The article aligns with the general consensu

Why objectivity (70): The tone remains neutral, presenting the facts without strong emotional language. However, there is some emphasis on the unusual nature of the incident occurring during the day in a busy area, which may slightly lean towards highlighting the anomaly rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories