MANILA, Philippines, Ten years have passed since the issuance of the 2016 Arbitral Award, a landmark decision affirming the Philippines’ sovereign rights in the South China Sea. Despite initial reluctance from former President Rodrigo Duterte, who dismissed the ruling as “a mere piece of paper” and even joked about tossing it into the trash, the Philippines has increasingly leveraged the award to assert its maritime claims. Recent developments underscore how the ruling continues to shape the geopolitical landscape, influencing both bilateral tensions and regional dynamics. The arbitration, conducted by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, invalidated China’s so-called “nine-dash line” and ruled in favor of the Philippines on key territorial and maritime disputes. However, China has consistently refused to recognize the award, viewing it as illegitimate and politically motivated. This stance has led to ongoing confrontations, particularly in the West Philippine Sea, where the Philippines maintains a presence through the BRP Sierra Madre, a World War II-era vessel stationed at Ayungin Shoal since 1999. Recent clashes highlight the persistent friction between the two nations. On July 20, a Filipino soldier sustained a head injury during a confrontation with Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) personnel near Ayungin Shoal. According to the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), the CCG used a wooden baton to strike the soldier, resulting in an open wound approximately 1.5 inches long. The incident occurred shortly before high-level diplomatic meetings between U.S. and Chinese officials in Manila, underscoring the heightened stakes in the region. The CCG’s actions reportedly included approaching the BRP Sierra Madre at close range, taking photographs and videos, and refusing to comply with Philippine naval instructions. The AFP accused the CCG of engaging in “illegal, coercive, aggressive, and deceptive actions” and urged adherence to the 2016 ruling. These incidents reflect a pattern of provocative behavior by China, which has escalated tensions despite the Philippines’ growing reliance on the arbitral award as a legal foundation for its claims. Compounding these tensions is a recent controversy involving a China Daily video, which has drawn sharp criticism from Philippine authorities. The AI-generated clip portrays a monkey dressed in a traditional Filipino barong and salakot, seemingly controlled by hands labeled “USA” and “Japan,” before being subjected to simulated cannon fire and interaction with a distressed whale. The video, released on July 10, was condemned by the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) as “racist, dehumanizing, and offensive,” with officials accusing China of using the imagery to stoke anti-Filipino sentiment and further erode trust between the two nations. The DFA formally protested the video, demanding its removal and calling for respectful public discourse. The Philippine Embassy in Beijing also issued a similar statement, emphasizing the need for China to uphold dignity and truth in its communications. Despite these diplomatic efforts, China has yet to respond directly to the Philippines’ demands. Instead, the video has sparked widespread condemnation from Filipino lawmakers, who accuse Beijing of projecting insecurity and arrogance through its propaganda. Some members of Congress, including Senator Leila de Lima, have characterized the video as evidence of China’s “entitled bully” mentality, suggesting that it reflects a deeper sense of frustration stemming from the Philippines’ steadfast defense of its sovereignty. Others, like Senate President Sherwin Gatchalian, have called for renewed commitment to “intelligent, respectful dialogue” and warned against the corrosive effects of such inflammatory content on intergovernmental relations. Meanwhile, the Philippines continues to navigate a complex geopolitical landscape, balancing its reliance on the 2016 ruling with the realities of ongoing hostilities. While the arbitral award provides a legal basis for asserting maritime rights, it has not eliminated the challenges posed by China’s militarization of disputed areas and its refusal to engage in meaningful negotiations. The recent incidents near Ayungin Shoal and the fallout from the China Daily video illustrate the enduring nature of these tensions, even as the Philippines seeks to leverage the award as a tool for diplomacy and national security.
8 reports
RapplerIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 7015 days agoPhilippine lawmakers strongly criticized a China Daily video that depicted Filipinos as monkeys controlled by the U.S. and Japan, labeling it racist and reflecting China's arrogance and insecurity over maritime disputes. The video, released on July 10, features an anthropomorphic monkey wearing Filipino traditional attire being manipulated by forces labeled 'USA' and 'Japan,' followed by a sequence symbolizing environmental destruction. Legislators like Leila de Lima accused China of undermining the Philippines' stance on the West Philippine Sea, a disputed area in the South China Sea. The Philippine government and officials have publicly protested the video, demanding its removal, while China's defense chief has faced sanctions for past remarks on China's actions in the region.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the video as evidence of China's arrogance and insecurity, aligning with narratives that portray China as aggressive and disrespectful toward the Philippines. The emphasis on China's alleged disrespect and the portrayal of China as an 'entitled bully' reflect a right-leaning frame
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the MTRCB's condemnation of the China Daily video, citing Lala Sotto's statement. It provides context about the video's content and the DFA's response.
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the MTRCB's perspective and the DFA's reaction but doesn't include China's response or a balanced discussion of the incident's broader implications.
RapplerIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 7015 days ago Hindi Ito Marites: 10 years of the Arbitral Award on the South China SeaThe article discusses the 10th anniversary of the 2016 arbitral ruling in the South China Sea case, which affirmed the Philippines' sovereign rights over certain areas of the sea. During his presidency, former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte dismissed the ruling as insignificant, calling it 'a mere piece of paper' that he would 'toss into the trash can.' This approach allowed China to assert greater influence in the region. However, the Philippines has since shifted strategy, using the ruling to strengthen its position in maritime security. The article highlights how the ruling remains relevant today and is being leveraged by the current administration.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Duterte administration's dismissal of the arbitral award as a failure, implying criticism of his policies. It contrasts this with the current administration's more strategic use of the ruling, suggesting a shift toward a more assertive stance on maritime sovereignty. The tone赞
Why factuality (95): The article provides a detailed account of the incident involving the Filipino soldier injured by the China Coast Guard, citing the Philippine military's statement. It includes specific details about the nature of the injury and the circumstances surrounding the clash.
Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the Philippine military's perspective, it doesn't include China's response or additional context that might provide a more balanced view of the incident.
RapplerIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7015 days ago Philippines tells Beijing: Take down ‘irresponsible, racist’ China Daily videoThe Philippines' Department of Foreign Affairs condemned a China Daily video for its racist portrayal of Filipinos as monkeys, arguing that the content exacerbates mistrust between the two countries. The video, published on July 10, 2026, depicts an anthropomorphic monkey wearing traditional Filipino attire being controlled by symbols representing the USA and Japan, then subjected to harsh treatment and environmental criticism. The DFA accused China Daily, a state-run media outlet, of using demeaning and racist imagery that undermines diplomatic discourse. The video was part of China's broader campaign to challenge the 2016 South China Sea Arbitral Award, which ruled against China's territorial claims and held it responsible for environmental damage. The Philippines emphasized that while disagreements over legal matters are acceptable, the use of offensive imagery crosses into unacceptable behavior.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Philippines' condemnation of the China Daily video as a justified response to racist and dehumanizing portrayals, emphasizing the harm caused to bilateral relations. It highlights the Philippines' stance against misinformation and the use of offensive imagery, aligning with a左
Why factuality (90): The article closely aligns with the DFA's official statement, accurately citing the condemnation of China Daily's AI-generated content and the specific date of the video (July 10, 2026). It provides context about the South China Sea Arbitral Award and references the DFA's position clearly.
Why objectivity (70): The article uses strong language such as 'demeaning, dehumanizing, and racist' and frames the issue as a clear case of racism without presenting alternative interpretations. It emphasizes the DFA's stance without offering opposing viewpoints.
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 6512 days agoThe Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) chair, Lala Sotto, criticized China Daily for publishing AI-generated videos that portrayed Filipinos in a 'racist and dehumanizing' manner. She expressed solidarity with Filipinos offended by the content and supported the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) in condemning the depictions. The videos, which included an AI-generated clip showing a monkey wearing a traditional Filipino garment and being sprayed with water, were shared on China Daily’s Facebook page. The DFA formally protested the content, and Malacañang stated that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. finds the portrayal unacceptable. While noting that the content falls outside her agency’s jurisdiction, Sotto emphasized the need for responsible use of emerging technologies and called for greater collaboration between government agencies, content creators, and streaming platforms.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue through the lens of national dignity and sovereignty, emphasizing the offense caused to Filipinos by foreign media. It highlights the government’s stance against the portrayal, aligning with nationalist sentiments. The focus on the DFA’s protest and the president’s disav
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the DFA's condemnation of the China Daily video, describing its content and the reasons for the criticism. It includes quotes from the DFA and references the 2016 Arbitral Award.
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the Philippine government's perspective without providing a balanced view of China's position or additional context that might help readers understand the broader geopolitical situation.
GMA News OnlineIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 6012 days agoA Philippine Navy member was allegedly struck with a baton by Chinese Coast Guard personnel during an encounter at Ayungin Shoal, according to a report by the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The incident occurred in a disputed maritime area, highlighting tensions between the Philippines and China over territorial claims in the South China Sea. The AFP report suggests that the Chinese authorities used force against a Filipino sailor, raising concerns about the escalation of hostilities in the region. This event adds to ongoing disputes involving both nations' naval forces in contested waters.
Bias read (Progressive): The article reports on an alleged act of aggression by Chinese authorities against a Philippine Navy member, which frames the incident as an example of China's assertive behavior in disputed territories. The focus on the potential use of force by China implies criticism of their actions, aligning it
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the AFP claim that China Coast Guard members struck a Philippine Navy member with a baton at Ayungin Shoal. It cites the AFP as the source, though it doesn't provide direct evidence or quotes from either side.
Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'racist' and 'dehumanizing' without providing a balanced perspective. It focuses heavily on the negative aspects of the incident without presenting China's viewpoint or context.
RapplerIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 6012 days ago Filipino soldier wounded in head during clash with China Coast Guard near Ayungin ShoalA Filipino soldier was injured on the head during a confrontation with Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) personnel near Ayungin Shoal in the West Philippine Sea on July 20. According to the Philippine military, the CCG used a 'wooden baton' to strike the soldier, resulting in an open wound. The incident occurred as the CCG approached the BRP Sierra Madre, a Philippine naval vessel stationed in the area since 1999. The CCG reportedly took photos and videos while circling the vessel, prompting the Philippine side to deploy rubber boats to order them to leave. When the CCG refused, a physical altercation ensued, leading to the injury. The Armed Forces of the Philippines condemned the actions as illegal and coercive, urging compliance with the 2016 Arbitral Award affirming Philippine maritime rights.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a violation of Philippine sovereignty and highlights the CCG's actions as 'illegal, coercive, aggressive, and deceptive.' It emphasizes the Philippines' legal claims under international law and criticizes China's behavior, aligning with narratives often associated
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the condemnation of the China Daily video by Philippine legislators, quoting Rep. Leila de Lima. It describes the content of the video and the reactions from various stakeholders.
Why objectivity (60): The article uses strong language such as 'entitled bully' and 'racist' without offering a counter-narrative or context from China's perspective, potentially biasing the reader against China.
RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 759 days ago China says it drove away Philippine vessels in fresh South China Sea incidentChina claims it tracked and intercepted two Philippine vessels near Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, asserting they had 'intruded' into Chinese waters despite warnings. This follows recent tensions between the two countries, including a clash at Ayungin Shoal. Both nations claim the area, with the Philippines referring to it as Bajo de Masinloc and China as Huangyan Dao. China's Coast Guard stated their actions were standard and lawful, while the Philippine Coast Guard and embassy in Beijing did not immediately respond. The incident comes amid ongoing disputes in the South China Sea, with both sides exchanging protests and diplomatic warnings.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the statements from both China and the Philippines without overtly favoring one side. It reports China's assertion of sovereignty and its actions against the Philippine vessels, but does not frame these actions as aggressive or defensive beyond quoting official statements. There
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports China's claim that it drove away Philippine vessels near Scarborough Shoal, citing China's Coast Guard statement. However, it lacks specific details about the incident itself, relying primarily on official statements without independent verification.
Why objectivity (75): The article presents China's perspective without significant counterbalance, using terms like 'infringing and provocative actions' which could be seen as biased. While it mentions the lack of response from the Philippine authorities, it doesn't offer a balanced analysis of the situation.
RapplerIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 6512 days ago [EDITORIAL] China wants to change status quo via racist videoThe article discusses a controversial video produced by China's state-run media outlet China Daily, which depicts Filipinos as monkeys. The Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs condemned the video as 'demeaning, dehumanizing, and racist,' while the Chinese Foreign Ministry claimed it does not reflect the government's position. The article criticizes China's actions as part of a broader strategy to challenge the Philippines' sovereignty claims in the South China Sea, particularly around the disputed Antelope Reef. It notes that this comes amid the 10th anniversary of the 2016 UNCLOS arbitration ruling, which affirmed the Philippines' exclusive economic zone rights. The piece highlights the tension between the principles of international law and China's assertive territorial claims.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames China's actions as morally bankrupt and strategically opportunistic, emphasizing the violation of international law and human dignity. It supports the Philippines' legal stance against China's territorial claims and criticizes China's use of dehumanizing propaganda. The tone is un
Why factuality (80): The article provides historical context about the 2016 Arbitral Award and its impact on the Philippines' stance in the South China Sea dispute. It references the current situation but doesn't include recent developments or direct quotes from officials.
Why objectivity (65): The article presents a critical view of former President Duterte's handling of the Arbitral Award but doesn't provide a balanced assessment of the current situation or China's perspective on the matter.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
PH
