ON
← Back to feed
The reason why Croatia's goal against Portugal was cancelled: the ball sensor, Matanovic's hair, Modric's rage and FIFA's position
GR⚽ Sports10 hr. ago

The reason why Croatia's goal against Portugal was cancelled: the ball sensor, Matanovic's hair, Modric's rage and FIFA's position

The article discusses the controversy surrounding a disallowed goal by Croatia against Portugal during the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The incident occurred in stoppage time (90+13') and involved a technical challenge over whether the ball touched the head of Croatian player Mateo Kovačić before reaching the goal. The decision was based on an embedded sensor in the ball, which detected a slight contact. This sparked debate about the reliability and accuracy of the technology used. The article highlights concerns about the fairness of the decision, questions the integrity of the sensor system, and references reactions from both teams and officials. It also notes that while the technology represents an advancement over traditional VAR systems, it remains subjective and open to interpretation.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Proto Thema logoProto ThemaIndependentCenter10 hr. ago
The reason why Croatia's goal against Portugal was cancelled: the ball sensor, Matanovic's hair, Modric's rage and FIFA's position

The article discusses the controversy surrounding a disallowed goal by Croatia against Portugal during the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The incident occurred in stoppage time (90+13') and involved a technical challenge over whether the ball touched the head of Croatian player Mateo Kovačić before reaching the goal. The decision was based on an embedded sensor in the ball, which detected a slight contact. This sparked debate about the reliability and accuracy of the technology used. The article highlights concerns about the fairness of the decision, questions the integrity of the sensor system, and references reactions from both teams and officials. It also notes that while the technology represents an advancement over traditional VAR systems, it remains subjective and open to interpretation.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of the technical and ethical implications of the goal disallowance without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the controversy, the technology involved, and the responses from players and officials, maintaining neutrality in tone and framing.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories