During the impeachment trial of Philippines Vice President Sara Duterte, a witness testified that she allegedly used fictitious names or names belonging to deceased individuals, including children, to document payments from intelligence-gathering state funds. The testimony suggests potential misuse of funds and raises questions about transparency and accountability in the allocation of public resources. The allegations come amid ongoing scrutiny of Duterte’s administration and its handling of national security matters. The case highlights concerns about the integrity of financial records in high-level political offices.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the use of fictitious names as a potential violation of transparency and accountability, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of political corruption. While the article does not explicitly take a partisan stance, the emphasis on the misuse of public funds and the implications,

![[Newsstand] The strongest argument for determining two-thirds impeachment vote](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F09%2Fprosec-poa.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)




