ON
← Back to feed
WASPAN challenges FCCPC’s digital lending powers at Court of Appeal
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenter11 hr. ago

WASPAN challenges FCCPC’s digital lending powers at Court of Appeal

The Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria (WASPAN) has challenged the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission's (FCCPC) authority to regulate digital lending in Nigeria through a legal appeal. The appeal follows a Federal High Court ruling that upheld the FCCPC's power under the 2018 Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act (FCCPA). WASPAN argues that the court misinterpreted the FCCPA and improperly expanded the FCCPC's regulatory reach into the telecommunications sector, which they claim falls under the Nigerian Communications Commission's (NCC) jurisdiction. The association filed nine grounds of appeal, requesting the Court of Appeal to overturn the lower court decision and block enforcement of the FCCPC's DEON Regulations until the matter is resolved. The FCCPC previously argued that WASPAN failed to meet procedural requirements before filing the lawsuit.

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has restarted the enforcement of the Digital, Electronic, Online or Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations, 2025 (DEON Regulations), after a Federal High Court in Lagos ruled against a challenge to the regulations. The court's decision, delivered on Monday, cleared the way for the FCCPC to resume regulating digital lenders, which had previously faced a temporary halt due to an interim court order. The case was brought by the Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria Ltd/Gte (WASPAN), which argued that the FCCPC lacked the authority to impose the DEON Regulations. In Suit No. FHC/L/CS/760/2026, the court rejected all claims made by WASPAN and confirmed that the regulations were enacted within the FCCPC’s statutory and constitutional powers. Justice A.L. Allagoa, who presided over the case, ruled that the specific provisions of the DEON Regulations challenged by the plaintiff were valid and should remain in effect. As a result, the court lifted the interim order that had previously prevented the FCCPC from implementing the regulations. This order had been issued in April 2026, prompting the commission to temporarily suspend the enforcement of the DEON Regulations. With the legal obstacle removed, the FCCPC stated that the regulations are now fully operational and can be enforced without restriction. Speaking on behalf of the commission, Mr. Ondaje Ijagwu, Director of Corporate Affairs, emphasized the FCCPC’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and maintaining effective regulation. He noted that the commission had complied with the court’s interim order by halting the implementation of the regulations. “We have always maintained that the rule of law is fundamental to effective regulation and good governance,” Ijagwu said. He further explained that the DEON Regulations were designed to foster responsible lending practices, enhance regulatory accountability, combat unfair and exploitative behavior, and bolster consumer protection within Nigeria’s digital lending landscape. According to Ijagwu, the commission aims to balance innovation and financial inclusion with the need for transparency, fairness, and accountability in the digital lending industry. The FCCPC’s renewed focus on regulating digital lenders comes amid growing concerns about predatory lending practices and the lack of oversight in the rapidly expanding fintech sector. The DEON Regulations require digital lenders to adhere to strict guidelines on interest rates, disclosure requirements, and customer service standards. They also empower the FCCPC to investigate violations and take corrective actions against non-compliant operators. Industry representatives, including members of WASPAN, have expressed mixed reactions to the court’s ruling. Some acknowledge the importance of regulatory oversight in protecting consumers, while others argue that the regulations could stifle innovation and limit access to credit for underserved populations. The association had previously claimed that the FCCPC’s regulatory approach was overly restrictive and did not account for the dynamic nature of the digital lending market. Moving forward, the FCCPC plans to intensify its efforts to monitor compliance with the DEON Regulations. It will likely engage in outreach programs to educate digital lenders on their obligations and provide guidance on best practices. The commission has also indicated that it will work closely with other regulatory bodies and stakeholders to ensure a coordinated approach to overseeing the digital lending ecosystem. With the legal barriers removed, the FCCPC is poised to implement its regulatory framework more aggressively, aiming to create a safer and more equitable environment for both lenders and borrowers in Nigeria’s evolving financial services sector.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 802 days ago
FCCPC resumes digital lending regulation as court vacates restraining order

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) in Nigeria has restarted enforcing the Digital, Electronic, Online or Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations (DEON Regulations) after a Federal High Court in Lagos ruled in favor of the commission. The court dismissed a lawsuit by the Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria Ltd/Gte (WASPAN), which had challenged the FCCPC's authority to regulate digital lenders. The court confirmed that the regulations fall within the commission's statutory and constitutional powers. The FCCPC had previously suspended the regulations following an interim court order, but now considers them fully operational. The commission emphasized its commitment to consumer protection, responsible lending, and maintaining a fair regulatory environment.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings involving the FCCPC and WASPAN. It reports the court's ruling without overtly criticizing either side, and the FCCPC's statement reflects a formal institutional position rather than ideological advocacy. There is no clear leaning to a左

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a court ruling that upheld the FCCPC's authority to implement the DEON Regulations, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the regulations were valid and legally sound. It provides details about the lawsuit, the court's decision, and the FCCPC's response, which are cons

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the facts neutrally, quoting both the court's decision and the FCCPC's statement. It avoids taking sides in the dispute between the FCCPC and WASPAN, maintaining a balanced tone. However, the language used ('legal barrier', 'fully operational') may subtly imply the FCCPC's posit

Premium Times Nigeria logoPremium Times NigeriaIndependentCenter11 hr. ago
WASPAN challenges FCCPC’s digital lending powers at Court of Appeal

The Wireless Application Service Providers Association of Nigeria (WASPAN) has challenged the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission's (FCCPC) authority to regulate digital lending in Nigeria through a legal appeal. The appeal follows a Federal High Court ruling that upheld the FCCPC's power under the 2018 Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act (FCCPA). WASPAN argues that the court misinterpreted the FCCPA and improperly expanded the FCCPC's regulatory reach into the telecommunications sector, which they claim falls under the Nigerian Communications Commission's (NCC) jurisdiction. The association filed nine grounds of appeal, requesting the Court of Appeal to overturn the lower court decision and block enforcement of the FCCPC's DEON Regulations until the matter is resolved. The FCCPC previously argued that WASPAN failed to meet procedural requirements before filing the lawsuit.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the legal dispute without overtly favoring either the WASPAN or the FCCPC. It reports the arguments made by both parties, including the FCCPC's procedural objections and the court's rejection of those claims. While the subject involves regulatory authority and law,

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories