Phasing in Maribor: With sprays over "phasers", with gasoline over dirt
The article reports on incidents of 'fazaniranje' (a traditional initiation ritual involving drawing on students' skin) at schools in Maribor, Slovenia, which has taken on a more violent form. During the first day of school, students aged around 15 were subjected to drawings made with markers and other materials, some of which had harmful chemical properties. The National Institute for Health Protection warned that these substances could cause genetic damage, cancer, and chronic toxicity. Some students required aggressive solvents like acetone or gasoline to remove the markings, leading to police intervention due to vandalism and injuries. Local publicist Boris Vezjak condemned the practice as disguised humiliation and physical abuse, urging schools to stop ignoring it. The Ministry of Education has previously warned that such practices are not part of the curriculum and that schools must ensure student safety if they choose to continue them.
On the first day of school in Maribor, September 1, 2026, students and staff were confronted with a disturbing phenomenon known locally as “fazaniranje,” a tradition that has taken on increasingly aggressive and violent forms. The practice, rooted in historical rituals of initiation into academic life, was once a symbolic act involving simple elements such as flour and eggs. However, this year, the activity escalated into a chaotic spectacle marked by the use of industrial paints, chemicals, and even gasoline to clean up the mess left behind. The event sparked widespread concern among educators, health officials, and law enforcement, raising serious questions about the safety and legality of such practices. The incident unfolded in the heart of Maribor, where groups of older students reportedly used a variety of substances, some of which were explicitly designed for industrial purposes, to mark younger students, particularly those in their first year of secondary school. These markings often covered entire faces, hands, and clothing, leaving many participants visibly distressed. In some cases, the use of aggressive materials led to physical harm, including loss of consciousness and the need for medical attention. One young woman required emergency care after being sprayed with paint, while others were found covered in a thick layer of synthetic resin, making removal nearly impossible without harsh chemical solvents. According to reports from the National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ), the substances commonly used in these rituals can have severe consequences. Many of the paints and markers contain toxic compounds that can cause skin irritation, respiratory issues, and even long-term damage to genetic material. Some ingredients have been classified as carcinogenic or chronically toxic, posing risks not only to the individuals involved but also to bystanders who might inhale the vapors. The institute emphasized that while short-term exposure to small amounts of these chemicals typically does not pose a direct threat to health, the repeated and intentional application of such materials raises significant concerns. The police were called in after several incidents, including the vandalism of a commercial display and damage to a building’s facade. Officers noted that while no property damage was confirmed, there were multiple reports of potential criminal behavior. In one case, a student was allegedly attacked with paint, leading to temporary unconsciousness. Police urged anyone who had been subjected to forced participation in the ritual to report the incident, warning that such actions could constitute violations of public order and potentially lead to legal consequences. The Ministry of Education, Science, and Sport issued a statement condemning the escalating violence associated with the tradition. Minister Borut Rončević expressed his concern over the growing trend of using harmful substances during the initiation process. He stressed that the start of the school year should be a time of hope and opportunity, not one of intimidation or abuse. The ministry reiterated that while traditional customs may have historical roots, they must not infringe upon the dignity or well-being of students. Educators and psychologists have also raised alarms, noting that the practice has shifted from a harmless cultural ritual to a form of bullying. Some schools continue to enforce the tradition despite official warnings, arguing that it is part of the social experience of transitioning into higher education. However, critics argue that the increasing aggression and use of dangerous materials indicate a troubling normalization of violence against younger students. This shift has prompted calls for stricter oversight and intervention from both educational authorities and local law enforcement. The situation highlights broader societal tensions around the boundaries of tradition and acceptable behavior. While some view the practice as a rite of passage, others see it as a dangerous and illegal form of harassment. Legal experts suggest that in certain cases, the use of harmful substances or the infliction of physical distress could be classified as assault or even criminal acts. The debate continues, with parents, teachers, and students divided on whether the tradition should be preserved or abolished altogether. As the controversy surrounding “fazaniranje” intensifies, authorities are under pressure to clarify the legal implications of such activities and to ensure that all students are protected from harm. The incident in Maribor serves as a stark reminder of how deeply ingrained traditions can evolve, and how quickly they can become problematic when they cross ethical and legal lines. For now, the focus remains on gathering evidence, assessing the extent of the issue, and determining the appropriate measures to prevent further escalation.
The article reports on incidents of 'fazaniranje' (a traditional initiation ritual involving drawing on students' skin) at schools in Maribor, Slovenia, which has taken on a more violent form. During the first day of school, students aged around 15 were subjected to drawings made with markers and other materials, some of which had harmful chemical properties. The National Institute for Health Protection warned that these substances could cause genetic damage, cancer, and chronic toxicity. Some students required aggressive solvents like acetone or gasoline to remove the markings, leading to police intervention due to vandalism and injuries. Local publicist Boris Vezjak condemned the practice as disguised humiliation and physical abuse, urging schools to stop ignoring it. The Ministry of Education has previously warned that such practices are not part of the curriculum and that schools must ensure student safety if they choose to continue them.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a violation of student rights and safety, emphasizing the harmful effects of the practice and calling for institutional accountability. It highlights concerns raised by health authorities and local activists, suggesting a left-leaning perspective focused on protecting
Why factuality (92): The article repeats the same content as item 1, providing similar details about the incidents in Maribor and the school principal’s stance. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and includes specific information about the school's prior warnings.
Why objectivity (80): This is a duplicate of item 1, maintaining the same level of subjectivity and critical tone towards the practice of 'fazaniranje.'
The article discusses the phenomenon of 'fazaniranje' (a form of prank or harassment involving spraying substances like flour, eggs, and paint) in Slovenia, highlighting its potential health risks and legal implications. Pediatrician Vlasta Kunaver warns of allergic reactions, skin irritation, and emotional trauma among students, while anthropologist Dan Podjed views such practices as normalized forms of violence. Lawyer Blaž Kovačič Mlinar criticizes the lack of tradition and emphasizes personal integrity and bodily autonomy. The article notes recent incidents in Maribor where a girl required medical attention after being sprayed, and others involved throwing substances into shops. Legal experts suggest some actions could constitute minor bodily harm or assault, though laws may classify them as misdemeanors rather than criminal offenses.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through a critical lens, emphasizing the harmful effects of 'fazaniranje' and linking it to broader societal issues like normalization of violence. While not overtly political, the discussion involves legal and ethical considerations that align with progressive values. S
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about the event in Maribor where fazaniranje got out of control, including the girl who needed medical help and the throwing of eggs and flour into a retail display. It also quotes experts like pediatrician Vlasta Kunaver, anthropologist Dan Podjed, and lawyer B
Why objectivity (75): The article presents multiple viewpoints from different experts but uses emotionally charged language such as 'aggressive', 'spontaneous', and 'trauma' when describing the effects of fazaniranje. While it attempts to remain balanced by quoting various individuals, the overall tone leans slightly tow
In September 2026, students in Slovenia engaged in a dangerous form of 'fazing', spraying each other with industrial-grade aerosols typically used for painting surfaces. This practice, which has traditionally been a harmless school tradition, turned hazardous this year due to the use of aggressive chemicals such as acrylic solvents and adhesives. These substances can cause severe skin irritation, chemical burns, respiratory issues, and even eye damage if they come into contact with sensitive tissues. Some students required medical attention after exposure, and there were reports of serious health risks including allergic reactions and long-term skin damage. The incident highlights growing concerns over the misuse of industrial products by young people and the potential dangers of unregulated behavior.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a public health concern involving student behavior and industrial chemicals. It does not take a clear ideological stance but focuses on the health risks and societal implications of the event. There is no evident bias toward any political group or ideology.
Why factuality (80): This article provides detailed information about the types of sprays used during the initiation rituals, including industrial sprays that can cause skin, lung, and eye damage. It references specific examples like Edding permanent spray and describes the physical effects observed, such as complete co
Why objectivity (65): While the article presents factual information, it uses emotionally charged language such as 'nevarno izživljanje' (dangerous living) and emphasizes the severity of potential harm. This suggests a more alarmist tone, potentially influencing the reader’s perception beyond purely objective reporting.
The article discusses the tradition of 'fazaniranje' (pheasanting), a rite of passage for students entering secondary school, which involves marking new students with the letter 'F' using alcohol-based markers. This practice has become more extreme in recent years, with some students being fully painted and decorated, raising health concerns due to potentially harmful substances used. In Maribor, police were called to incidents involving vandalism and one case where a girl lost consciousness after being sprayed. Authorities urge students who are forced into this activity to report it, as such actions could lead to legal consequences. The tradition, rooted in university rituals from medieval times, originally served as a form of initiation to prepare students for academic life, but has now devolved into a form of humiliation.
Bias read (Center): While the article addresses a social issue with potential legal implications, it does not take a clear ideological stance. It presents both the cultural background and the current problematic aspects of the tradition without overtly favoring any particular political viewpoint. The focus remains on事实
Why factuality (80): This article provides more detailed information about the incidents, including the use of 'F' markings, the involvement of health workers, and the specific case of a girl losing consciousness. It includes quotes from police and mentions the potential dangers of the sprays, which adds depth to the fa
Why objectivity (60): The article has a more subjective tone, using phrases like 'kruto izživljanje' and 'žrtve' which imply judgment. It also presents the situation as problematic and dangerous, which may reflect an editorial stance rather than purely objective reporting.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
