ON
← Back to feed
Family seek judicial review of police shooting of unarmed Taranaki man Kaoss Price
NZ🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive6 hr. ago

Family seek judicial review of police shooting of unarmed Taranaki man Kaoss Price

The family of Kaoss Price, a 22-year-old unarmed man fatally shot by police in April 2022, is seeking a judicial review of the Independent Police Conduct Authority's (IPCA) investigation into the incident. The IPCA concluded that the officer involved used excessive force but did not recommend prosecution. The family argues that the investigation failed to provide sufficient transparency and that the officer's account of the event is implausible. They claim that Price was fleeing a routine traffic stop, drove dangerously, and was shot point-blank in the chest while unarmed and running away. The family's legal team emphasized the broader issue of fatal police shootings, especially involving young Māori men, and called for more accountability and clarity in the case.

Advertisement

2 reports

RNZ (Radio New Zealand) logoRNZ (Radio New Zealand)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
Family seek judicial review of police shooting of unarmed Taranaki man Kaoss Price

The family of Kaoss Price, a 22-year-old unarmed man fatally shot by police in April 2022, is seeking a judicial review of the Independent Police Conduct Authority's (IPCA) investigation into the incident. The IPCA concluded that the officer involved used excessive force but did not recommend prosecution. The family argues that the investigation failed to provide sufficient transparency and that the officer's account of the event is implausible. They claim that Price was fleeing a routine traffic stop, drove dangerously, and was shot point-blank in the chest while unarmed and running away. The family's legal team emphasized the broader issue of fatal police shootings, especially involving young Māori men, and called for more accountability and clarity in the case.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the family's perspective, emphasizing systemic issues around police conduct and the disproportionate impact on Māori communities. It highlights concerns over lack of transparency and accountability in the IPCA's findings, suggesting criticism of law enforcement practices and a呼吁

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about the case, such as the name of the victim (Kaoss Price), the date of the incident (April 2022), and the legal actions being taken by the family. It references the IPCA's findings and quotes the family's lawyer accurately. However, some details are incomplet

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the family's perspective and includes direct quotes from their lawyer, but it also highlights the family’s argument that more information should be made public. While it does not explicitly take sides, the emphasis on the 'alarming rate of fatal police shootings' may introduce a

RNZ (Radio New Zealand) logoRNZ (Radio New Zealand)State / PublicCenter6 hr. ago
Police officers made 'split second tactical decisions' in fatal shooting of Kaoss Price, High Court told

The High Court in Wellington is reviewing the decision not to charge the police officer who fatally shot Kaoss Price in 2022. Crown lawyers argued that the officers involved made 'split second tactical decisions' during the incident. The Independent Police Conduct Authority concluded that the officer who fired the fatal shot used excessive force but did not recommend prosecution. The case involves a man with multiple criminal convictions, including firearm possession, who was wanted by police. Officers claimed they felt threatened during the encounter, leading them to draw their weapons and fire at Price's vehicle.

Bias read (Center): The article presents legal testimony and findings from an independent authority without overtly favoring either the police or the victim. It includes balanced descriptions of the circumstances and does not employ biased language or selective sourcing.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories