ON
← Back to feed
Fakir, the lawyer: "Don't ask who he was, ask yourself if it's right to die at the hands of the state"
Italy🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Fakir, the lawyer: "Don't ask who he was, ask yourself if it's right to die at the hands of the state"

The article is a personal letter from an attorney to a deceased individual named Fakir Abderrahim, expressing deep sorrow over his death while in police custody. The author recounts their recent meeting where Fakir was hopeful about obtaining legal permission to stay in Italy and continue working. The letter highlights Fakir’s fear of deportation under new immigration laws and his belief that he would be treated like in the U.S., where immigrants are sent back. The author criticizes the state for failing to protect individuals in its care, questioning whether the police were properly trained and if such deaths are common, particularly among people of Arab descent. The tone is emotional and accusatory, urging readers to reflect on systemic failures and the ethics of state authority.

An Italian woman, known as Fakir, has died while in police custody, sparking outrage over the treatment of migrants and asylum seekers under Italy’s immigration policies. The incident has ignited fierce debate over the conditions in which undocumented individuals are held and the procedures followed by law enforcement during detentions. According to statements made by a close friend and lawyer, Fakir was feared for being deported despite having legal grounds to remain in Italy. Her death has raised serious questions about the safety and rights of vulnerable groups within the country's immigration system. The lawyer, who had recently met with Fakir before her detention, expressed deep sorrow and regret over the circumstances surrounding her death. She described how Fakir had been hopeful about the outcome of his case, expecting to receive permission to stay in Italy and continue running his business. The lawyer recounted their last conversation, during which Fakir had voiced concerns about the new European migration pact and its potential impact on immigrants like himself. Despite assurances that he had the necessary legal documents and that the police respected the rule of law, Fakir remained anxious about his future. Fakir, according to the lawyer, was a worker who had faced difficult decisions, including laying off some employees due to a decline in business. He was described as kind and concerned about the well-being of others. His death has left the lawyer deeply affected, struggling to find words to comfort others who may now share similar fears. She has vowed to speak out against the fear that Fakir carried, urging others to question whether it is just to die in the hands of the state. The lawyer has called for an end to processing cases like Fakir’s through administrative means rather than judicial ones, arguing that such cases should be handled in court to ensure fairness and justice for all. She has emphasized the need for systemic changes, including better training for police officers in de-escalation techniques, the use of proportionate force, and emergency medical response during arrests. She has also demanded transparency and accountability, calling for independent investigations into the conduct of law enforcement and the publication of data on deaths occurring in custody or during police operations. Her comments have resonated with many, highlighting broader concerns about the treatment of migrants and the lack of protections for those in vulnerable situations. There is growing pressure on authorities to address these issues, particularly in light of recent incidents involving other detainees. Activists and human rights organizations have joined the call for reform, emphasizing the urgent need for policy changes that prioritize the dignity and safety of all individuals, regardless of their legal status. The lawyer has also pointed to historical patterns, referencing past cases where individuals have died in police custody, often under similar circumstances. These incidents have fueled public anger and demands for greater oversight of law enforcement practices. The current situation underscores the ongoing challenges faced by migrants and asylum seekers in Italy, as well as the broader implications for human rights and social justice. As calls for change grow louder, the hope is that Fakir’s death will serve as a catalyst for meaningful reforms that protect the rights of all citizens.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

la Repubblica logola RepubblicaIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 60yesterday
Fakir, the lawyer: "Don't ask who he was, ask yourself if it's right to die at the hands of the state"

The article is a personal letter from an attorney to a deceased individual named Fakir Abderrahim, expressing deep sorrow over his death while in police custody. The author recounts their recent meeting where Fakir was hopeful about obtaining legal permission to stay in Italy and continue working. The letter highlights Fakir’s fear of deportation under new immigration laws and his belief that he would be treated like in the U.S., where immigrants are sent back. The author criticizes the state for failing to protect individuals in its care, questioning whether the police were properly trained and if such deaths are common, particularly among people of Arab descent. The tone is emotional and accusatory, urging readers to reflect on systemic failures and the ethics of state authority.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue around institutional failure and systemic racism, criticizing the Italian state and police for their handling of Fakir’s case. It uses emotive language and rhetorical questions to challenge the legitimacy of state power and calls for reform, aligning with left-wing views

Why factuality (85): The article presents an emotionally charged account from the perspective of an attorney who knew Fakir Abderrahim, describing her fear of deportation under new immigration laws and her death in police custody. While not a primary source, it aligns with broader reports about the treatment of immigran

Why objectivity (60): The tone is highly personal and emotional, focusing on the lawyer’s grief and guilt rather than presenting an objective analysis of the legal or political situation. It uses rhetorical questions and emotive language, suggesting a subjective rather than neutral stance.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories