ON
← Back to feed
‘Fake claims’: Great Nicobar lighthouse project study lists species found in Africa, Amazon
India🏛️ PoliticsConservativeyesterday

‘Fake claims’: Great Nicobar lighthouse project study lists species found in Africa, Amazon

A recent environmental impact assessment study for the Rs 250 crore Indira Point lighthouse project on Great Nicobar Island has come under scrutiny for listing species primarily found in Africa and the Amazon. The report, prepared by WAPCOS Limited, includes species like tiger fish and flagtail, which are native to different regions, and omits notable local wildlife such as sea turtles. Ecologists and marine biologists have criticized the study as 'shocking' and 'completely fabricated,' noting that over 90% of the listed species have never been reported from Great Nicobar. The project is part of a larger infrastructure initiative that includes a proposed transshipment port, which faces criticism for potential environmental harm and displacement of indigenous communities. Clarifications have been requested from officials involved in the study.

1 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentConservativeyesterday
‘Fake claims’: Great Nicobar lighthouse project study lists species found in Africa, Amazon

A recent environmental impact assessment study for the Rs 250 crore Indira Point lighthouse project on Great Nicobar Island has come under scrutiny for listing species primarily found in Africa and the Amazon. The report, prepared by WAPCOS Limited, includes species like tiger fish and flagtail, which are native to different regions, and omits notable local wildlife such as sea turtles. Ecologists and marine biologists have criticized the study as 'shocking' and 'completely fabricated,' noting that over 90% of the listed species have never been reported from Great Nicobar. The project is part of a larger infrastructure initiative that includes a proposed transshipment port, which faces criticism for potential environmental harm and displacement of indigenous communities. Clarifications have been requested from officials involved in the study.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the environmental impact assessment as potentially misleading or fabricated, suggesting a lack of scientific rigor. It highlights criticisms from experts, implying possible negligence or bias in the study's preparation. While the focus is on environmental concerns, the broader imp

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories