The European Union has accused Meta of failing to adequately assess and limit addictive features on its platforms, including Facebook and Instagram. The EU claims these features—such as endless content feeds, highly personalized recommendations, and automatic video playback—contribute to unhealthy user behavior and compulsive usage. The European Commission argues that these functions encourage users to scroll indefinitely, negatively impacting their health. Additionally, the EU criticizes Meta’s parental controls as too complex and ineffective in limiting screen time for minors. In response, a Meta spokesperson denied the preliminary findings, highlighting measures like dedicated teen accounts that allow parents to restrict access during certain hours. The EU launched this investigation under the Digital Services Act (DSA), similar to a previous request directed at TikTok. Meta now has the opportunity to defend itself and propose solutions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the EU's concerns about Meta's practices and Meta's rebuttal, offering balanced perspectives. While the EU frames the issue as a regulatory action against a major tech company, Meta responds by emphasizing its existing safeguards. There is no clear ideological leaning in ph
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the EU's concerns about addictive features on Meta platforms and cites the Commission's statements. It includes a response from Meta, showing some balance. However, the article ends abruptly mid-quote, suggesting incomplete reporting, and uses emotionally charged terms





