ON
← Back to feed
The far right in the European Parliament is at risk of losing public funding.
RO🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

The far right in the European Parliament is at risk of losing public funding.

Over 200 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have called for an investigation into the political family comprising Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) and France's Reconquête, both far-right parties suspected of violating EU values. The motion, based on a report by the European Political Parties Authority, highlights controversial content such as a Slovak MEP comparing a Sudanese migrant to a 'repulsive and dirty psychopath' and a Bulgarian party equating homosexuality with pedophilia. The report also includes videos featuring Eric Zemmour, leader of Reconquête, including one titled 'Theft at the Louvre is a daily jihad.' The MEPs argue that those violating EU rules should not receive public funding, potentially leading to the suspension of nearly two million euros annually in subsidies for electoral campaigns and conferences. The motion will be voted on next week, and if the investigation finds violations, the 'Europe of Sovereign Nations' group could lose these funds. The group claims the process is politically motivated.

More than 200 Members of the European Parliament have called for an investigation into the political group "Europe of Sovereign Nations," which includes Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) and France's Reconquête. The group has been accused of violating European Union values. This initiative could potentially lead to the suspension of European funding allocated to the group, according to reports from AFP cited by Agerpres.

The motion was prompted by a report from the European Political Parties Authority, which cataloged several materials published by members of the group. These include a video recording of a Slovak deputy who compared a Sudanese migrant to a "repulsive and dirty psychopath" and a press release from a Bulgarian party equating homosexuality with pedophilia. Additionally, two recordings featuring Eric Zemmour, leader of Reconquête, were mentioned, including one titled "Theft at the Louvre Museum is a daily jihad."

The more than 200 MEPs who signed the motion are requesting that the relevant authority investigate whether the group violates EU values. German MEP Daniel Freund stated, "Our position is clear: those who break the rules should no longer be rewarded with millions from public funds." The motion will be put to a vote in the European Parliament next week.

European funding for political groups can amount to millions of euros annually. If the investigation is opened and findings are unfavorable for the formation, "Europe of Sovereign Nations" could lose financial support for electoral campaigns and congresses, which total nearly two million euros per year. Representatives of the group reject the accusations and claim the procedure is politically motivated, according to AFP.

The European Parliament has seen increasing scrutiny over far-right groups due to their rhetoric and policies. The allegations against "Europe of Sovereign Nations" come amid broader concerns about the influence of extremist ideologies within EU institutions. The potential loss of funding could significantly impact the group's operations and visibility within the European Parliament.

The motion highlights growing tensions between mainstream political forces and far-right factions. While the latter often criticize EU institutions for overreach and bureaucratic inefficiency, they also face criticism for promoting divisive and discriminatory messages. The European Parliament has previously taken action against other groups suspected of violating its rules, but this case marks a significant escalation given the scale of the alleged violations.

The situation underscores the complexity of balancing free speech with the need to uphold democratic values within the EU. As the investigation proceeds, it remains to be seen how the European Parliament will handle the outcome and whether similar actions will be taken against other groups. The debate over the role of far-right parties in European politics is likely to continue, influencing future legislative and policy decisions.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Digi24 logoDigi24IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
More than 200 MEPs call for an inquiry in the EP into the 'Europe of Sovereign Nations' group accused of violating EU values

Over 200 European Parliament deputies have requested an investigation into the 'Europe of Sovereign Nations' group, accused of violating EU values. The initiative stems from a report by the European Union’s Political Parties Authority, which cites materials published by members of the group, including a video comparing a Sudanese migrant to a 'repulsive and dirty psychopath' and a Bulgarian party statement equating homosexuality with pedophilia. The investigation could lead to the suspension of EU funding for the group, which receives subsidies worth nearly two million euros annually. Deputies argue that those who break rules should not be rewarded with public funds. The motion will be put to a vote in the European Parliament next week. Representatives of the group deny the allegations, claiming the procedure has political motives.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the request for an investigation as a formal procedural move based on a report from an authoritative body, without overtly endorsing or condemning the actions of the accused group. It includes quotes from both sides—deputies arguing against funding violations and the group's den

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the request by over 200 MEPs for an investigation into the far-right group 'Europe of Nations and Sovereigns', citing specific examples from a report by the European Political Parties Authority. It mentions potential loss of EU funding and quotes a German MEP. However,

HotNews logoHotNewsIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 657 days ago
The far right in the European Parliament is at risk of losing public funding.

Over 200 Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have called for an investigation into the political family comprising Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) and France's Reconquête, both far-right parties suspected of violating EU values. The motion, based on a report by the European Political Parties Authority, highlights controversial content such as a Slovak MEP comparing a Sudanese migrant to a 'repulsive and dirty psychopath' and a Bulgarian party equating homosexuality with pedophilia. The report also includes videos featuring Eric Zemmour, leader of Reconquête, including one titled 'Theft at the Louvre is a daily jihad.' The MEPs argue that those violating EU rules should not receive public funding, potentially leading to the suspension of nearly two million euros annually in subsidies for electoral campaigns and conferences. The motion will be voted on next week, and if the investigation finds violations, the 'Europe of Sovereign Nations' group could lose these funds. The group claims the process is politically motivated.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing multiple MEPs across different political spectrums who signed the motion, along with the specific allegations against the far-right groups. It does not favor one side over another but reports the facts and potential consequences of the proposed

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): This article mirrors the first in content, reporting the same allegations and procedural steps. It also lacks substantial balance, focusing primarily on the accusations and quoting supporters of the investigation. The mention of Eric Zemmour’s statements and the potential consequences is thorough bu

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories