A French administrative court has rejected a new appeal filed by Russian journalist Xenia Fedorova against her expulsion from the country, according to reports published this week. The decision comes after a tribunal in Paris dismissed a request for a suspension of her removal, citing insufficient grounds for urgency. Fedorova, who is currently abroad, faces potential deportation following allegations that she acted as a conduit for disinformation campaigns orchestrated by Russian authorities aimed at destabilizing public order in France. The rejection of the latest legal challenge follows a previous appeal in early August, which was also denied by the court. That case had been heard under a different procedural framework, known as référé-liberté, and was similarly dismissed due to the lack of an "extreme emergency," a prerequisite for such proceedings. The current ruling focuses on a référé-suspension, a legal mechanism designed to halt an action pending further review. However, judges determined that the conditions required for this measure were not met, even though they did not rule on the legality of the initial expulsion decree itself. Fedorova’s legal team, led by attorney Emmanuel Piwnica, argued during Thursday's hearing that the measures targeting his client, including her expulsion and the freezing of her assets for six months, were both illegal and disproportionate. He claimed there was no evidence that her presence in France posed a threat to public order or national interests. Despite these arguments, the court maintained its stance, stating that the urgency required for a suspension could not be established. The charges against Fedorova stem from accusations that she served as a platform for Russian state-backed misinformation efforts intended to undermine stability in France. These claims have been central to the legal actions taken against her, with authorities asserting that her activities constituted a risk to national security. The court, however, has not yet made a final determination on the validity of these allegations, as it continues to consider a separate appeal that was submitted alongside the référé-suspension. Fedorova, 45 years old, has been a prominent figure in Russian media circles and has previously worked as a commentator and analyst. Her expulsion has drawn attention from both supporters and critics, with some expressing concern over the implications for freedom of expression and journalistic independence. Others argue that her alleged role in spreading disinformation justifies the legal measures taken against her. The ongoing legal battle highlights the complex interplay between national security concerns and individual rights in contemporary European jurisprudence. While the court has ruled against suspending Fedorova’s expulsion, it has left open the possibility of further judicial review. This means that the case may still proceed through other legal channels, potentially leading to a more detailed examination of the evidence presented by both sides. Legal experts suggest that the outcome of the upcoming recours au fond, a full merits-based appeal, will depend heavily on how the court interprets the nature of Fedorova’s activities and whether they meet the threshold for endangering public order. Until then, the situation remains unresolved, with the legal process continuing to unfold in the French administrative courts.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter