ON
← Back to feed
Experts criticize digital wallet: digital wallet with a hook
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 days ago

Experts criticize digital wallet: digital wallet with a hook

The article discusses concerns raised by experts regarding the upcoming digital wallet (EUDI-Wallet) in Germany, set to launch early next year. Experts from science and civil society highlight issues related to data protection, IT security, and liability. They emphasize unclear responsibility in cases of data theft or identity fraud, as well as unresolved questions about burden of proof. The Federal Ministry of Digital Affairs and State Modernization (BMDS) states that data will be stored locally and encrypted on smartphones, and the app will be free and voluntary. However, critics warn that the system could lead to mandatory usage over time, increasing risks of over-identification. Consumer advocate Marielle Findorf points out that service providers can decide which data to request from the wallet, without allowing partial sharing. She also stresses the need for the app to support user-chosen pseudonyms as a standard feature.

Experts have raised significant concerns about Germany's upcoming digital wallet system, which is set to launch early next year. The initiative, known as the EUDI-Wallet, aims to provide citizens with a secure digital identity solution, allowing them to store and use personal documents such as identification cards, driver's licenses, and health insurance cards within a mobile app. However, during a recent expert hearing organized by the Left Party faction in the German parliament, several specialists highlighted critical issues related to data protection, IT security, and liability. The proposed digital wallet is part of the Digital Identity Act (DidG), which was approved by the federal cabinet in May. According to the government, the EUDI-Wallet will allow users to store their data locally on their smartphones, encrypted and protected. The app itself will be free to use, and participation will remain voluntary. Nevertheless, the system also serves as a potential tool for verifying age when accessing social media platforms, raising additional privacy concerns. Marielle Findorf from the Federal Consumer Center Association (vzbv) emphasized the lack of clarity regarding liability. She questioned who would be held responsible in cases of data theft or identity fraud, noting that the burden of proof in such situations remains undefined. This uncertainty could lead to legal complications for both users and service providers. Christian Knabenhans from the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) warned that the mandatory use of the digital wallet might eventually become a requirement rather than an option. He expressed concern over the risk of excessive identification, where more services might demand verification due to the ease of access provided by the wallet. Findorf further pointed out that current proposals allow service providers to request specific data from the digital wallet without offering partial data sharing options. Users can either accept or reject requests but cannot selectively share information. She stressed the importance of enabling users to choose pseudonyms and making this feature the default setting. Bianca Kastl from the Innovation Consortium for Public Health voiced concerns about an experimental clause included in the draft legislation. This clause permits deviations from existing laws, potentially leading to irreversible problems if something goes wrong. Kastl argued that such provisions are inappropriate in the realm of digital identities. The official launch date for the EUDI-Wallet in Germany is scheduled for January 2nd. Despite these planned developments, the Left Party faction criticized the composition of the associations invited to comment on the legislative proposal. They noted that among the 47 contacted organizations, only one represented civil society in digital policy, while over 20 were business-related groups. This imbalance has sparked debates about whether the interests of consumers and civil society are adequately represented in the decision-making process. As the implementation of the digital wallet approaches, ongoing discussions around its implications continue. Experts urge policymakers to address the identified challenges before the system becomes fully operational. Concerns over user autonomy, data security, and the potential for increased surveillance remain central to the discourse surrounding the EUDI-Wallet. With the launch date fast approaching, the outcome of these deliberations will significantly influence how the digital wallet is perceived and utilized by the public.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

taz – die tageszeitung logotaz – die tageszeitungIndependentCenter4 days ago
Experts criticize digital wallet: digital wallet with a hook

The article discusses concerns raised by experts regarding the upcoming digital wallet (EUDI-Wallet) in Germany, set to launch early next year. Experts from science and civil society highlight issues related to data protection, IT security, and liability. They emphasize unclear responsibility in cases of data theft or identity fraud, as well as unresolved questions about burden of proof. The Federal Ministry of Digital Affairs and State Modernization (BMDS) states that data will be stored locally and encrypted on smartphones, and the app will be free and voluntary. However, critics warn that the system could lead to mandatory usage over time, increasing risks of over-identification. Consumer advocate Marielle Findorf points out that service providers can decide which data to request from the wallet, without allowing partial sharing. She also stresses the need for the app to support user-chosen pseudonyms as a standard feature.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents criticisms of the digital wallet initiative, it does not show a clear ideological leaning. It reports on expert concerns without overtly favoring any particular political stance. The discussion includes both governmental assurances and critiques from consumer advocates, as

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories