ON
← Back to feed
Israel Is Removing Rubble From Gaza ‘to Erase Evidence’ of Genocide
World🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives9 days ago

Israel Is Removing Rubble From Gaza ‘to Erase Evidence’ of Genocide

Israeli authorities are reportedly removing rubble from areas of Gaza under their military control, raising concerns among human rights organizations that this action is intended to erase evidence of alleged war crimes and genocide. According to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, approximately 10 million tonnes of rubble have been removed from 66% of Gaza, potentially destroying physical evidence of unlawful killings, destroyed homes, and damaged infrastructure. This process is described as part of efforts to ethnically cleanse Palestinian neighborhoods and obscure evidence of crimes against humanity. Amnesty International researcher Budour Hassan stated that these operations aim to obliterate and hide evidence of wrongdoing. Around 400 machines operated by Israeli civilian companies are involved in the demolition and removal of rubble. As of now, at least 73,389 Palestinians have been reported killed, and around 10,000 remain missing, many possibly buried beneath the rubble.

Ukrainian officials and former detainees have detailed widespread and systematic torture and abuse by Russian forces during their captivity, according to testimony presented at an informal U.N. Security Council session on Monday. Multiple ex-detainees and representatives of the Ukrainian government described how prisoners of war and civilians were subjected to brutal treatment, including beatings, electric shocks, sexual abuse, and even execution, while being held incommunicado in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions. Thousands of Ukrainians remain in Russian custody, according to official estimates. Khuan Alberto Levya Garsiya, a Ukrainian military officer captured by Russian forces, recounted enduring nearly every conceivable form of torture during his 1,183 days in captivity. He described being beaten, subjected to electric shocks, forced to perform excessive exercises in subzero temperatures, and exposed to sexual abuse. Garsiya claimed that two of his fellow prisoners were killed by beatings in detention centers in the Donetsk region. He also noted that prisoners were kept in overcrowded barracks without proper sanitation, leading to widespread illness and starvation. Garsiya, whose father is Cuban, stated that Russian guards specifically targeted him due to his Latino-sounding name, falsely accusing him of being a “mercenary and an American spy.” Crimean Tatar activist Leniie Umerova, who was released in a prisoner exchange in 2024, described her experience of being detained while attempting to visit her seriously ill father in Crimea. She spoke of being transferred through seven different detention facilities, which she characterized as part of a “carousel of repression.” Umerova alleged that Russia used torture against Ukrainian detainees, including psychological and physical abuse, to extract information or punish perceived dissent. Oleg Gushin of the Ukrainian government’s Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War confirmed that Ukrainian prisoners were “killed and tortured” in Russian detention. He stated that Kyiv had identified more than 300 locations where Ukrainians were held captive, both within Russia and in occupied Ukrainian territories. According to Gushin, over 9,000 Ukrainians have been returned through prisoner exchanges, though thousands remain in Russian hands. Ukraine’s Chargé d’Affaires, Volodymyr Pavlichenko, urged the international community to exert greater pressure on Russia regarding its treatment of prisoners. He emphasized the need for accountability and transparency concerning the suffering endured by Ukrainian captives. The U.N. Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights, Claudia Fuentes Julio, highlighted findings from U.N. monitoring efforts indicating that the Russian Federation continued to engage in “widespread and systematic torture and ill-treatment” of Ukrainian prisoners of war and civilian detainees. These abuses included sexual violence, such as rape, gang rape, and genital assault, as well as beatings with objects like batons and heavy belts, electric shocks, and mock executions. Fuentes Julio cited documentation of 129 Ukrainian prisoners executed at the start of their captivity and 48 deaths in custody since February 2022, attributed to torture, lack of medical care, or inhumane detention conditions. Over 95% of Ukrainian prisoners of war interviewed by the U.N. reported experiencing torture or ill-treatment, with more than half reporting instances of sexual violence. The Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has documented these abuses, providing evidence of the severity and scale of the violations committed against Ukrainian detainees.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Daily Sabah logoDaily SabahParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 95Objective 7512 days ago
Ex-Ukrainian detainees detail torture, abuse in Russian captivity

Former Ukrainian detainees and officials allege that Russia has conducted a systematic campaign of torture and abuse against prisoners of war and civilian detainees, involving beatings, electric shocks, sexual abuse, and harsh living conditions. These accounts include testimonies from individuals like Khuan Alberto Levya Garsiya, who spent over three years in captivity and described various forms of psychological and physical torment. Russia denied these allegations at a U.N. Security Council session, dismissing them as disinformation and accusing Ukraine of similar abuses against its prisoners. Ukrainian officials reported that thousands of citizens remain in Russian custody, with some having died in detention. The United Nations has confirmed ongoing reports of widespread and systematic torture of Ukrainian detainees.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents detailed accounts from Ukrainian officials and former detainees alleging systemic torture by Russia, which aligns with Western narratives critical of Russia's actions in the conflict. While Russia denies the allegations, the framing emphasizes the severity of the accusations and

Why factuality (95): The article presents detailed accounts from Ukrainian ex-detainees describing systematic torture by Russian forces, supported by quotes from a Ukrainian military member and mentions of Russian official responses. While no primary source document is available, the claims align with broader internatio

Why objectivity (75): The article includes emotional testimony from a detainee and uses strong language like 'systematic campaign of torture' and 'sexual abuse,' which may reflect a biased perspective. The focus on Ukrainian suffering and the dismissal of Russian claims as 'disinformation' suggests a pro-Ukrainian stance

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 8011 days ago
Testimony of Ukrainian civilians from Russian captivity: torture, starvation and sexual violence

The article reports on the treatment of over 16,000 Ukrainian civilians detained by Russia during its invasion, citing UN data and testimonies from former detainees. It highlights systematic torture, poor treatment, and sexual abuse, with over 95% of military prisoners and 85% of civilians reporting such experiences. The UN documented 129 deaths of Ukrainian prisoners early in their captivity and 48 more due to mistreatment, lack of medical care, or other inhumane conditions. While the UN has access to some information through interviews with released detainees, they cannot independently verify exact numbers due to restricted access to Russian detention centers. The article also notes that while the UN claims conditions have improved since 2022, Russia has dismissed these allegations as part of a disinformation campaign against Moscow.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a serious humanitarian crisis caused by Russia’s actions, emphasizing systemic abuse and international condemnation. It cites UN sources and survivor accounts to highlight the severity of the situation, which aligns with left-leaning narratives that prioritize human权利

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the number of civilians detained by Russia, citing the UN's findings and aligning with the primary source document. It mentions the systematic torture, sexual violence, and poor treatment of detainees, which matches the UN report. However, it omits specific details lik

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains relatively neutral, presenting facts without overt bias. However, there is a slight emotional undertone in the description of the detainees' suffering, particularly in the mention of 'spolno nasilje' and the physical state of former detainees.

Novara Media logoNovara MediaIndependentProgressiveFactual 50Objective 309 days ago
Israel Is Removing Rubble From Gaza ‘to Erase Evidence’ of Genocide

Israeli authorities are reportedly removing rubble from areas of Gaza under their military control, raising concerns among human rights organizations that this action is intended to erase evidence of alleged war crimes and genocide. According to Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, approximately 10 million tonnes of rubble have been removed from 66% of Gaza, potentially destroying physical evidence of unlawful killings, destroyed homes, and damaged infrastructure. This process is described as part of efforts to ethnically cleanse Palestinian neighborhoods and obscure evidence of crimes against humanity. Amnesty International researcher Budour Hassan stated that these operations aim to obliterate and hide evidence of wrongdoing. Around 400 machines operated by Israeli civilian companies are involved in the demolition and removal of rubble. As of now, at least 73,389 Palestinians have been reported killed, and around 10,000 remain missing, many possibly buried beneath the rubble.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the actions of the Israeli military as an attempt to erase evidence of genocide and war crimes, using strong terms such as 'ethnic cleansing' and referencing international legal frameworks like the Rome Statute. It cites human rights organizations and emphasizes the destruction,

Why factuality (50): This article discusses a completely different event involving Israel and Gaza, unrelated to the primary source document about Russia's actions in Ukraine. It contains no relevant information about the topic at hand and thus cannot be assessed for factuality regarding the specified event.

Why objectivity (30): The tone and content of this article are focused on a different conflict and contain strong allegations against Israel, suggesting a clear bias. It does not address the subject matter of the primary source document.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories