Countries at war will not be allowed to host Eurovision...
The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organizes the Eurovision Song Contest, has introduced new rules prohibiting countries involved in armed conflict from hosting the event. This decision follows concerns over security and stability in regions affected by war or sensitive geopolitical situations. The minimum age for contestants has been raised from 16 to 18 years to protect younger performers from potential pressures associated with participating in the contest. While Israel, which has been conducting military operations in Gaza since 2023, narrowly missed winning the competition in recent years, it did not face restrictions due to its involvement in the conflict. Several countries, including Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Iceland, boycotted this year’s contest in Vienna due to Israel’s participation. Ukraine hosted the contest in 2017 despite ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine but could not host in 2023 due to the war with Russia. Instead, Liverpool in the UK hosted the event in Ukraine’s name. The new rules allow EBU to commission an independent security assessment if the winning country is deemed unable to host safely, potentially assigning another host.
The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) has announced new rules prohibiting countries involved in armed conflict from hosting the Eurovision Song Contest. The decision comes after years of debate over the contest’s role in politically sensitive contexts. According to the EBU, the rule applies to all states engaged in active warfare, whether they are aggressors or victims, and will take effect starting with this year's event. This marks a significant shift from previous policies, which allowed host nations to participate even during internal conflicts, such as Ukraine’s participation in 2017 despite ongoing war in eastern regions. Under the updated guidelines, the winning country will no longer automatically host the following year’s contest. Instead, the EBU will assess the safety and stability of the potential host nation before making a final decision. If deemed unsuitable, the organization will select an alternative host country. The policy was introduced in response to concerns raised by member states about the risks associated with holding the event in unstable environments. A separate change raises the minimum age for contestants from 16 to 18 years old, aiming to protect younger performers from pressures linked to international competition. Izrael, which has been conducting military operations in the Gaza Strip since 2023, serves as a notable example under these new rules. Despite finishing second in both the 2024 and 2025 contests, the country’s continued involvement has led to protests. Five nations, Spain, Ireland, Netherlands, Slovenia, and Iceland, boycotted the 2025 contest in Budapest due to its collaboration with Israel. Director Martin Green explained that the changes were made based on feedback from member states, emphasizing clarity, protection of participants, and maintaining the integrity of the event while ensuring a safe and welcoming environment. The EBU has also clarified that countries involved in wars can still participate in other aspects of the contest, including performing songs, voting, and engaging in cultural exchanges. However, they will not be eligible to serve as hosts. This distinction is crucial, as it allows some level of engagement while avoiding direct association with the hosting responsibilities. The policy does not explicitly address NATO members, leaving uncertainty about how such alliances might influence future decisions. For instance, Slovenia, among others, boycotted the 2025 contest due to its alignment with Israel, highlighting the political tensions that can affect participation. Historically, the Eurovision Song Contest has occasionally faced challenges related to geopolitical issues. In 2017, Ukraine hosted the event despite ongoing conflict with pro-Russian separatists in the east. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the country was unable to host the subsequent contest, and the event instead took place in Liverpool, UK, representing Ukraine. These past instances underscore the evolving nature of the contest’s approach to security and neutrality. The new age requirement for contestants, raising the minimum age from 16 to 18, reflects broader efforts to safeguard young artists. The EBU stated that this measure aims to reduce external pressures on performers and ensure their well-being throughout the competition. Sandra Kim, the youngest-ever Eurovision winner at 13 years old from Belgium in 1986, remains a historical exception to this rule. The change underscores a growing emphasis on protecting the welfare of participants, particularly in high-profile international settings. As the 2026 contest approaches, the implications of these new rules remain clear. Countries currently in conflict will be excluded from hosting duties, while many will continue to engage in other ways. The EBU has emphasized that the goal is to maintain the spirit and integrity of the contest while adapting to contemporary global realities. The outcome of this policy will likely shape the future direction of one of Europe’s longest-running and most culturally significant events.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
