ON
← Back to feed
Europe is sending applicants back to Italy
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter2 days ago

Europe is sending applicants back to Italy

Evropske države, vključno z Nemčijo, Avstrijo, Švico, Finsko in Švedsko, so napovedale vnovično vračanje prosilcev za azil v Italijo, če je bila ta njihova prva država vstopa v Evropsko unijo. To se osnova na novih evropskih pravilih, ki določajo, da je država prvega vstopa odgovorna za obravnavo prošnje za azil. Italija zavrača povezavo med začasnim nadzorom in določili novega migracijskega pakta ter zavrača stare primere iz časa pred spremembo zakonodaje. Med državami se pojavljajo nesoglasja, kar je povzročilo pogovore med italijanskim in nemškim zunanjim ministrom. Nova uredba o upravljanju azila in migracij (AMMR) določa, da morajo prosilci vložiti prošnjo za azil v državi prvega vstopa. Italija zavrača zahteve za premestitev in vztraja, da ne bo sprejemala prosilcev, katerih primeri izvirajo iz obdobja pred spremembo zakonodaje.

After nearly four years of inactivity, several European countries have announced plans to resume returning asylum seekers to Italy, provided that Italy was their first point of entry into the European Union. Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Finland, and Sweden made this announcement this week, citing new rules under the European migration and asylum pact introduced in June. The move has sparked tensions with Italy, which has refused to accept cases dating back to before the implementation of these changes. The decision follows the replacement of the Dublin Regulation with the Asylum and Migration Management Regulation (AMMR). Under the old system, the first EU country where an asylum seeker arrived was responsible for processing their application. This often meant Italy, due to its position as a gateway for migrants arriving via the Mediterranean Sea. Between 2018 and 2022, approximately 17,600 asylum seekers were returned to Italy under the Dublin Regulation. However, Italy announced in 2022 that it could no longer accommodate returns due to an overburdened asylum system, leading to a de facto halt in such operations. Italy's Prime Minister, Giorgia Meloni, has rejected any link between her government’s recent decision to impose temporary border controls with Spain and the introduction of the new migration pact. She argues that the new rules better protect Italy as the first country of entry, emphasizing the reinforcement of the safe third country principle, which allows for faster processing and quicker repatriation of individuals without protection claims. Meloni stated that her government has rejected 80,000 asylum applications from other countries since 2023. Germany was the first to announce its intention to restart returns to both Italy and Greece. However, Italian authorities reportedly have rejected Berlin’s requests so far. In response to the growing disagreement, Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani and his German counterpart Johann Wadephul held a phone conversation on Wednesday, agreeing to pursue closer coordination on migration issues and stress the importance of effectively securing the EU’s external borders. Switzerland, although not an EU member, participates in the European migration system and has also announced plans to return individuals registered in the Eurodac database after the new regulations came into effect. According to reports, Switzerland is preparing its first flights, with returns potentially beginning by late August. Similar measures are being prepared by Austria, Finland, and Sweden. Finland’s Interior Ministry noted that the new regulation enables the resumption of transfers, which the country is currently preparing. The situation has triggered political debates within Italy. Opposition leader Elly Schlein of the Democratic Party described the developments as a “boomerang effect,” following Italy’s recent imposition of temporary border controls with Spain due to a large influx of migrants into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta in North Africa. Schlein criticized the move, highlighting the potential consequences for Italy’s reputation and international relations. Meloni, however, maintains that there is no connection between the temporary border controls and the establishment of the new migration pact, asserting that the pact actually protects Italy. She emphasized the strengthening of the safe third country principle, which she believes will facilitate quicker repatriations for those without valid protection claims. Her comments underscore the ongoing disagreements among European nations regarding the management of migration flows and the responsibilities of individual countries in the asylum process. As the new regulations take shape, the practical implications remain unclear. While some countries have already begun preparations for returns, others are still assessing their options. The situation highlights the complex interplay between national policies, regional cooperation, and the broader challenges of managing migration in Europe. With the summer season approaching, the potential for increased movement of people along the continent’s borders adds urgency to the discussions and actions being taken by governments across the region.

2 reports

Dnevnik logoDnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 852 days ago
Europe is sending applicants back to Italy

Evropske države, vključno z Nemčijo, Avstrijo, Švico, Finsko in Švedsko, so napovedale vnovično vračanje prosilcev za azil v Italijo, če je bila ta njihova prva država vstopa v Evropsko unijo. To se osnova na novih evropskih pravilih, ki določajo, da je država prvega vstopa odgovorna za obravnavo prošnje za azil. Italija zavrača povezavo med začasnim nadzorom in določili novega migracijskega pakta ter zavrača stare primere iz časa pred spremembo zakonodaje. Med državami se pojavljajo nesoglasja, kar je povzročilo pogovore med italijanskim in nemškim zunanjim ministrom. Nova uredba o upravljanju azila in migracij (AMMR) določa, da morajo prosilci vložiti prošnjo za azil v državi prvega vstopa. Italija zavrača zahteve za premestitev in vztraja, da ne bo sprejemala prosilcev, katerih primeri izvirajo iz obdobja pred spremembo zakonodaje.

Bias read (Center): Artikel opisuje politično temo, povezano z migracijo in azilom, kar je zelo kontroverzno. Ključne strani, kot so Evropska unija, Italija in države članice, so vključene v razpravo. Artikel ne prikazuje nobene strani z izjemno pozornostjo ali enstrannim naslovljem, ampak opisuje različne stališče drž

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that several European countries have announced the resumption of returning asylum seekers to Italy under new EU rules. It references the June 2026 migration pact and mentions the shift from the Dublin Regulation to the AMMR. The numbers (17,600 returned between 2018-20

Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without overt bias. However, there is subtle emphasis on Italy’s position as a 'first entry point' and the challenges faced by its asylum system, which could be seen as slightly sympathetic to Italy’s perspective.

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 882 days ago
Several European countries to return asylum seekers to Italy after four years

Več evropskih držav, vključevala Nemčijo, Avstrijo, Švico, Finsko in Švenco, so v skladu z novim paktom o migracijah in azilu, ki je nadomestil dublinskoto uredbo, obnovili vračanje prosilcev za azil v Italijo kot prvo državo v EU, v katero so vstopili. Nova uredba o upravljanju azila in migracij (AMMR) določa, da je za obravnavo prošnje za mednarodno zaščito primarna odgovorna država vstopa, kar pomeni, da so države lahko vračale prosilce v Italijo. Italija je zavračala prošnje za vračanje, kar je povzročilo polemiko v politiki. Polemiko je dodatno poslabšala dejstvo, da je Italija nedavno zaradi množičnega navala migrantov v Ceuto uvedla mejno kontrolno mere.

Bias read (Center): Artikel opisuje politično temo, povezano z migracijo in azilom, kar je zelo kontroverzno. Ključne države so razvili skupne pravila, kar kaže na solidarnost. Čeprav obstaja nekaj političnih napotkov, artikel ne izkazuje zelo jasne stranske naklonjenosti, ampak predstavlja faktsko stanje in razmerje,

Why factuality (94): This article corroborates the main points from Dnevnik, including the return of asylum seekers to Italy, the role of the new migration pact, and the transition from the Dublin Regulation to AMMR. It also provides similar statistics and mentions the 2022 capacity issues. The reference to 'dpa' adds c

Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting both the policy changes and Italy’s response. There is no clear editorializing, though the use of phrases like 'simbolična fotografija' might subtly imply a symbolic or political message.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories