ON
← Back to feed
'Everything was in ruins': Iran's FM Araghchi describes surviving Israel's opening strikes
World🏛️ PoliticsProgressive5 hr. ago

'Everything was in ruins': Iran's FM Araghchi describes surviving Israel's opening strikes

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi provided a detailed account of the initial moments of the Israel-Iran conflict, describing his experience during an Israeli strike on a compound where senior Iranian officials were present. He recounted being in the compound of former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei when the attack occurred, leading to significant destruction and chaos. Araghchi described the aftermath, including debris and damage to the area, and mentioned being escorted to safety by security personnel in a civilian car. He expressed concerns about Israel's advanced intelligence capabilities and raised questions about potential human infiltration within Iran's security system.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi gave a harrowing account of the early hours of the Israel-Iran war, describing how he narrowly avoided death during an Israeli airstrike targeting a high-ranking officials’ compound. According to an over 90-minute interview with Iranian journalist Javad Moghouei, Araghchi was present at the location where former supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s chief of staff, Ali Hejazi, was holding a meeting. The attack struck around 9:30 a.m., catching the group off guard. Araghchi described the scene as one of utter devastation. “We entered through the same beams, beds, and other wooden debris,” he said. “From the room, we came into a hall where the sound of ‘Ya Hossein’ could be heard. Water was dripping from the ceiling, and everything was in a state of ruin.” The damage was extensive, with the structure left largely unrecognizable. Security personnel immediately evacuated him, pulling him from the wreckage and rushing him to safety in a civilian vehicle. A young officer, whose identity remains unknown, drove him to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The minister expressed deep concern over the accuracy of Israeli intelligence, which reportedly pinpointed the location of Iran’s top leaders. “This coincidence, this insight, and the fact that it happened at 9:30 in the morning, I no longer attribute this to technology or artificial factors,” Araghchi said. “I really don’t know what to make of it.” He hinted at ongoing investigations into potential human infiltration within Iran’s security services, suggesting that internal threats might have contributed to the breach. Araghchi also mentioned that despite the chaos, some contingency plans had been put in place. “There was even a code,” he revealed. “If a certain code is triggered, what should we do?... The code is Code 110.” This suggests that Iran had attempted to prepare for such scenarios, though the effectiveness of these measures remains unclear. Following the attacks, Iran’s leadership moved out of their regular offices, relocating to nearby areas. “Of course, we weren’t in our offices, but near the Ministry of Foreign Affairs we had arranged alternative locations,” Araghchi said. However, he admitted that these new locations were not entirely secure. “I don’t know how secure they really were, but in the end, there was no safe place at all. Except for the tunnel, there was nowhere safe.” He further elaborated on the challenges of operating from underground facilities. “Tunnels matter, but do you know the condition for using them? If you go, you have to stay for a few days. You can’t just go in and come back,” he said. This highlights the logistical difficulties faced by Iran’s leadership in maintaining operational continuity amid the ongoing conflict. Araghchi also noted that discussions about succession or emergency leadership arrangements had been considered so sensitive that they were rarely addressed openly. “Sometimes it also affects the orientation of decision-making, and even worse, it influences and shapes our psychological environment,” he said. These remarks underscore the internal strain and uncertainty within Iran’s political circles. As the situation continues to evolve, both sides remain locked in a complex and volatile standoff. The revelations from Araghchi provide a rare glimpse into the immediate aftermath of the initial strikes, highlighting the vulnerabilities exposed by the attacks and the broader implications for Iran’s security infrastructure. The long-term consequences of these developments will likely shape the trajectory of the conflict in the coming weeks.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 705 hr. ago
'Everything was in ruins': Iran's FM Araghchi describes surviving Israel's opening strikes

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi provided a detailed account of the initial moments of the Israel-Iran conflict, describing his experience during an Israeli strike on a compound where senior Iranian officials were present. He recounted being in the compound of former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei when the attack occurred, leading to significant destruction and chaos. Araghchi described the aftermath, including debris and damage to the area, and mentioned being escorted to safety by security personnel in a civilian car. He expressed concerns about Israel's advanced intelligence capabilities and raised questions about potential human infiltration within Iran's security system.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the perspective of Iran's Foreign Minister, focusing on the narrative of Iranian officials' experiences during the conflict. It highlights Iran's vulnerabilities and suggests internal security issues, which aligns with a left-leaning framing by emphasizing Iran's challenges and,

Why factuality (85): The article cites a direct quote from Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who described his experience during the initial Israeli strikes. It references satellite imagery and provides details about the location and timing of the events. While no primary source document is available, the informa

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the account from an Iranian official but frames it with descriptive language that emphasizes the chaos and destruction, potentially influencing the reader's perception. There is a clear focus on the Iranian perspective, which may introduce bias. The language used to describe the

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories