ON
← Back to feed
Eurovision changes the rules, 'Countries at war will not be able to host the contest'
Italy🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

Eurovision changes the rules, 'Countries at war will not be able to host the contest'

Il Eurovision Song Contest ha modificato le sue regole per vietare ai Paesi in guerra di ospitare l'evento. Secondo le nuove normative, il Paese vincitore non potrà automaticamente ospitare l'edizione successiva se si trovano in situazioni di conflitto armato, instabilità geopolitica o altre condizioni che mettono a rischio la sicurezza o la stabilità del territorio. La decisione segue il boicottaggio di cinque Paesi durante l'edizione di Vienna, che avevano contestato la partecipazione di Israele a causa delle sue azioni nella Striscia di Gaza. L'Ucraina, pur essendo stata vincitrice nel 2022, non ha potuto ospitare l'edizione del 2023 a causa della guerra russo-ucraina, e l'evento è stato organizzato a Liverpool per conto dell'Ucraina.

The Eurovision Song Contest has announced a major revision to its rules, stating that countries engaged in war will no longer be eligible to host the competition starting in 2027. According to the official statement released by the organizers, the winning broadcaster will automatically be ineligible to host the following year’s event if the country is involved in armed conflict, geopolitical tensions, or other situations that significantly impact national security, safety, or regional stability. The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which oversees the contest, may commission independent assessments of the safety conditions in the region of the winning country. Following these evaluations, the EBU will consult with the Reference Group, its executive committee, to determine whether the winning nation can host the event. If the assessment concludes negatively, an alternative host will be selected, who will assume all responsibilities related to organizing the entire event. The new rule comes after recent controversies surrounding the contest. Last year, several countries, including Spain, Ireland, Slovenia, the Netherlands, and Iceland, boycotted the Eurovision held in Vienna over Israel’s participation and the ongoing conflict in Palestine. This marked the first time multiple nations refused to take part in the event. Additionally, in 2017, Ukraine hosted the contest in Kyiv despite an ongoing conflict in the south of the country involving pro-Russian separatists supported by Moscow. However, in 2023, even though Ukraine won the previous edition with the song "Stefania" performed by Kalush Orchestra, the event was moved to Liverpool, United Kingdom, due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Eurovision Song Contest is a joint production involving public broadcasters from EBU member states, including those outside Europe. Traditionally, the winner of one year hosts the following year’s event. Under the new guidelines, the EBU may conduct independent security assessments of the winning country’s region if deemed necessary. These assessments would influence whether the EBU’s executive committee deems the country suitable to host the contest. If not, an alternative host will be chosen, who will bear all organizational duties, including management, production, and staging of the event. The announcement does not explicitly name any specific country affected by the new rule. However, Israel came close to winning the contest in both 2025 and 2026, finishing second each year. The boycott last year by five European countries was linked to their objections to Israel’s military actions in response to attacks by the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas in October 2023. The situation highlights how geopolitical tensions can influence international cultural events and raise questions about the balance between artistic expression and political considerations. In past years, the contest has been held in countries facing complex security challenges. For instance, Ukraine hosted the event in 2017 amid the ongoing conflict in the east of the country. Despite this, the contest proceeded as planned. However, in 2023, Ukraine could not host the event after winning the previous year due to the large-scale Russian invasion. As a result, the event was relocated to Liverpool, where the UK-based broadcaster took responsibility for organizing the contest on behalf of Ukraine. The changes to the Eurovision rules reflect growing awareness of the potential risks associated with hosting high-profile international events in politically unstable regions. While the EBU has not specified any particular country that might be affected by the new policy, the inclusion of non-European members means the rule could apply globally. The organization emphasized that decisions regarding hosting rights will be based strictly on objective assessments of security and stability, ensuring the event continues to be a platform for musical talent while minimizing risks to participants and audiences alike.

2 reports

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7010 days ago
Eurovision changes the rules: countries at war will no longer be able to host the event

The Eurovision Song Contest has updated its rules to prevent countries involved in armed conflict or geopolitical tensions from hosting the event. According to the new regulations, if a country wins the contest but is deemed unsafe due to war or instability, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) may appoint an alternative host. This change follows recent controversies, including last year’s boycott by several nations over Israel’s participation and the Palestinian genocide. The rule was influenced by past instances such as Ukraine hosting the 2017 event despite ongoing conflict in the south and the 2023 contest being moved to Liverpool after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the new rules neutrally, citing the EBU's official statement and referencing specific geopolitical events without overtly favoring any side. It provides historical examples and mentions multiple countries' actions without taking a stance on their validity or morality.

Why factuality (90): This article accurately summarizes the new Eurovision rule changes based on the EBU's announcement. It provides additional historical context such as Ukraine hosting in 2017 despite ongoing conflict and the 2023 move to Liverpool due to Russia's invasion. These facts are consistent with the broader

Why objectivity (70): While the article is largely factual, it frames the change in rules as a response to 'polemics' and specifically references the genocide in Palestine, which introduces a more emotionally charged perspective. This slightly skews the neutrality by emphasizing the political controversy rather than pres

ANSA logoANSAIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7511 days ago
Eurovision changes the rules, 'Countries at war will not be able to host the contest'

Il Eurovision Song Contest ha modificato le sue regole per vietare ai Paesi in guerra di ospitare l'evento. Secondo le nuove normative, il Paese vincitore non potrà automaticamente ospitare l'edizione successiva se si trovano in situazioni di conflitto armato, instabilità geopolitica o altre condizioni che mettono a rischio la sicurezza o la stabilità del territorio. La decisione segue il boicottaggio di cinque Paesi durante l'edizione di Vienna, che avevano contestato la partecipazione di Israele a causa delle sue azioni nella Striscia di Gaza. L'Ucraina, pur essendo stata vincitrice nel 2022, non ha potuto ospitare l'edizione del 2023 a causa della guerra russo-ucraina, e l'evento è stato organizzato a Liverpool per conto dell'Ucraina.

Bias read (Center): L'articolo presenta le nuove regole del Eurovision senza prendere posizione chiaramente a favore o contro nessuna fazione politica. Menziona i boicottaggi di alcuni Paesi nei confronti di Israele ma non attribuisce responsabilità né giudica le azioni militari. Il focus rimane sulle regole e sui fatt

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the new rule regarding countries in conflict not being able to host the Eurovision Song Contest, citing the EBU's official statement. It also mentions Israel's near-victory in recent years and the boycott by several countries over Israel's actions in Gaza. However, it

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the information neutrally but includes some contextual details about the political tensions surrounding Israel's participation, which may subtly influence the reader’s perception. The tone remains mostly factual but shows awareness of the controversy without overtly taking sides

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories