ON
← Back to feed
European Parliament must rethink its approach to Türkiye
TR🏛️ PoliticsOverlooked from the left10 days ago

European Parliament must rethink its approach to Türkiye

The article criticizes the European Parliament's recent report on Türkiye, arguing that it lacks objectivity and has become overly politicized over the past decade. The author, who previously served as Türkiye's Minister for EU Affairs, claims that the EP's reports no longer serve as balanced evaluations but instead reflect the ideological priorities of political factions within the Parliament. The report is accused of making sweeping political judgments, selectively interpreting domestic developments, and proposing impractical recommendations that do not contribute meaningfully to improving relations between Türkiye and the EU. Specific criticisms include the report's focus on Türkiye's Minister of Justice and its interference in ongoing judicial processes, which the author argues undermines the principle of judicial independence. The article highlights a growing disconnect between the EP's approach and the geopolitical realities facing both Türkiye and Europe.

MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli strongly criticized a recently adopted European Parliament (EP) report on Turkey, which was passed by 381 members with 107 opposing and 171 abstaining. The report includes 55 proposed amendments and expands criticism regarding Turkey’s democratic practices, judicial independence, and human rights record. It specifically calls for sanctions against Justice Minister Akın Gürlek due to judicial actions targeting opposition-led municipalities. Bahçeli defended the independence of Turkey’s judiciary and warned against external interference. The Turkish Foreign Ministry also dismissed the report as politically driven and detached from genuine strategic ties with the EU.

A separate analysis published in Daily Sabah questioned the EP's impartiality, suggesting that its reports have grown increasingly politicized over the last decade. The piece, authored by a former Turkish minister responsible for EU affairs, argued that the EP no longer provides balanced assessments but instead reflects the ideological agendas of various parliamentary groups. The report was criticized for making broad political statements, selectively interpreting events within Turkey, and offering unrealistic policy suggestions that fail to enhance relations between Turkey and the EU. Particular concern was raised about the report’s focus on the Justice Minister and its potential impact on judicial independence.

Both accounts highlight significant disagreement over the nature and intent of the EP report. While Turkish officials view it as an unjustified attack on national sovereignty and legal autonomy, critics within the EP argue that it addresses legitimate concerns about governance and human rights. This divergence underscores a broader tension in the evolving relationship between Turkey and the European Union.

2 reports

Hurriyet Daily News logoHurriyet Daily NewsParty-alignedRight10 days ago
MHP leader slams European Parliament report on Türkiye

MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli criticized a non-binding European Parliament report on Turkey, which was adopted by 381 MEPs with 107 opposing and 171 abstaining. The report included 55 proposed amendments and expanded criticisms of Turkey's democracy, judicial independence, and human rights. It also called for sanctions against Justice Minister Akın Gürlek related to judicial actions against opposition-led municipalities. Bahçeli emphasized that Turkey's judiciary operates independently and warned against foreign interference. Turkey's Foreign Ministry rejected the report, calling it politically motivated and disconnected from real strategic relations with the EU.

Bias read (Right): The article presents the perspective of MHP leader Devlet Bahçeli, who strongly criticizes the European Parliament report and frames it as an attack on Turkish sovereignty and judicial independence. The language used emphasizes resistance to external pressure and portrays the report as politically-m

Daily Sabah logoDaily SabahParty-alignedRight12 days ago
European Parliament must rethink its approach to Türkiye

The article criticizes the European Parliament's recent report on Türkiye, arguing that it lacks objectivity and has become overly politicized over the past decade. The author, who previously served as Türkiye's Minister for EU Affairs, claims that the EP's reports no longer serve as balanced evaluations but instead reflect the ideological priorities of political factions within the Parliament. The report is accused of making sweeping political judgments, selectively interpreting domestic developments, and proposing impractical recommendations that do not contribute meaningfully to improving relations between Türkiye and the EU. Specific criticisms include the report's focus on Türkiye's Minister of Justice and its interference in ongoing judicial processes, which the author argues undermines the principle of judicial independence. The article highlights a growing disconnect between the EP's approach and the geopolitical realities facing both Türkiye and Europe.

Bias read (Right): The article frames the European Parliament's actions as ideologically driven and politically biased, suggesting that its reports are not objective assessments but tools for advancing partisan agendas. The tone is critical of the EP's role in shaping Türkiye's domestic affairs, implying that European

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories