The Airbnb trick: 165 requests to the building police

KurierParty-alignedCenter5 hr. ago

The article discusses the increase in applications for changing the use of buildings to short-term rental businesses in Vienna, specifically targeting tourist accommodations. Since July 2024, landlords need special permission to rent out properties for more than 90 days annually. However, investors have exploited a loophole by applying for changes in building use, allowing them to host guests temporarily for longer periods. As of June 22, 2024, 165 applications were submitted, with 47 approved, 80 under review, and 17 withdrawn. The Leopoldstadt district had the most applications, while outer districts like Hietzing saw none. Critics, including Greens representatives, argue this practice reduces housing availability for residents. The city’s building police note that these applications vary widely and cannot definitively determine if they aim to bypass regulations. They are evaluating data with policymakers to consider legal adjustments. Fines up to €50,000 can be imposed for violations.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about regulatory changes and their implementation without overtly favoring either side. It includes perspectives from both critics (Greens) and officials (building police), maintaining balance. While there is some criticism of investor practices, the tone is纪

oe24IndependentCenteryesterday

The European Union has announced plans to challenge companies like Airbnb by introducing stricter regulations aimed at addressing issues such as unfair competition and market distortion. The move comes amid growing concerns over the impact of short-term rental platforms on traditional hospitality sectors and local housing markets. Regulators argue these platforms often operate with fewer restrictions compared to established hotels, leading to an uneven playing field. The proposed measures could include increased transparency requirements, higher taxes, and more stringent licensing rules for property rentals. This development signals a broader effort by the EU to regulate digital services and protect consumer interests.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the EU's regulatory stance against platforms like Airbnb without overtly favoring either side. It outlines the potential implications of new regulations but does not take a clear ideological position. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the regulatory action rather than the