ON
← Back to feed
The EU has decided that unsold clothing will no longer be thrown away
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

The EU has decided that unsold clothing will no longer be thrown away

EU je usvojila novu uredbu koja zabranjuje uništavanje neprodane odjeće i obuće, zahtijevajući umjesto toga preprodaju ili donaciju. Odluka slijedi podatke Europske komisije prema kojima se svake godine uništava između 4 i 9 posto neprodanog tekstila, uz stvaranje oko 5,6 milijuna tona CO2 emisija. Uredba izuzima robe koje su opasne, oštećene ili ne mogu se ponovno koristiti, a donacije koje nisu prihvaćene u vremenu također mogu biti uništene. Nemački Savez trgovaca na malo (HDE) smatra da ova uredba može pomoći potrošačima pristupiti jeftinijoj odjeći kroz različite prodajne kanale, dok se ističe potreba za boljom strukturom za prikupljanje i recikliranje. Organizacije poput Greenpeace i WWF upozoravaju da će zakon biti efektivan samo ako se dosljedno provodi, jer tvrtke mogu lako zaobići pravila.

Starting today, European Union regulations have taken effect that will prevent unsold clothing and footwear from being discarded. Large companies within the EU can no longer destroy unsold garments and shoes. Instead, they must resell or donate such items. The new regulation requires businesses to handle unsold textile products through alternative means rather than disposal. Previously, destruction was considered more cost-effective than storage, resale, or recycling. According to data from the European Commission, between four and nine percent of unsold textiles in Europe are destroyed annually, with some of these items never worn, generating around 5.6 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year. The regulation excludes companies only in cases where the goods are hazardous, damaged, contaminated, or cannot be reused or repaired. Additionally, items offered as donations but not accepted within a specified period can still be destroyed. According to dpa, the German Federation of Retailers (HDE) indicated that this new regulation could benefit consumers, as it might lead to cheaper goods appearing on the market through other sales channels and platforms that sell second-hand items, reports tportal. In addition to providing consumers access to cheaper clothing, the regulation could also be beneficial for the environment, as less clothing would be destroyed and more would be resold or donated. However, challenges remain for companies. They warn that not all unsold goods can be sold or donated because there may be no demand for certain items or their value is too low to justify further price reductions. Consumer organizations support the regulation, but also highlight potential issues. On the other hand, according to dpa, the German Association of Fashion Industry welcomes the new regulation, considering clothing a valuable product whose destruction should be avoided. They emphasize that most European clothing production companies will not feel the impact of this regulation, as they rarely destroyed their unsold stock even before. However, the challenge lies in the large quantities of inexpensive clothing items ordered directly by consumers from suppliers outside Europe, such as China. Therefore, they call for these non-European manufacturers to contribute similarly to European producers and participate in the costs of collecting, sorting, and recycling used textiles. They caution that an effective structure for collecting, sorting, and recycling is needed, otherwise the ban on destruction remains just on paper and does not contribute to real circular economy practices. Similarly, environmental protection organizations issue warnings. Companies can easily bypass the rules, for example, by incorrectly declaring products. Without consistent enforcement, nothing will change in practice, warns Greenpeace. From WWF, it is emphasized that the law will be good only if it is consistently implemented.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
The EU has decided that unsold clothing will no longer be thrown away

EU je usvojila novu uredbu koja zabranjuje uništavanje neprodane odjeće i obuće, zahtijevajući umjesto toga preprodaju ili donaciju. Odluka slijedi podatke Europske komisije prema kojima se svake godine uništava između 4 i 9 posto neprodanog tekstila, uz stvaranje oko 5,6 milijuna tona CO2 emisija. Uredba izuzima robe koje su opasne, oštećene ili ne mogu se ponovno koristiti, a donacije koje nisu prihvaćene u vremenu također mogu biti uništene. Nemački Savez trgovaca na malo (HDE) smatra da ova uredba može pomoći potrošačima pristupiti jeftinijoj odjeći kroz različite prodajne kanale, dok se ističe potreba za boljom strukturom za prikupljanje i recikliranje. Organizacije poput Greenpeace i WWF upozoravaju da će zakon biti efektivan samo ako se dosljedno provodi, jer tvrtke mogu lako zaobići pravila.

Bias read (Center): Artikel neutralno objašnjava novu eurpsku uredbu, navodeći podatke, reakcije različitih stranaka (npr. nemački Savez trgovaca, udruge modne industrije, organizacije za zaštitu okoliša), i upozorenja o potencijalnim problemima. Nema jasnoj strani ili preteranog političkog naglasavanja, pa je leži blí

Why factuality (85): The article reports on an EU regulation regarding textile waste, citing data from the European Commission about annual textile waste and CO2 emissions. It references the German Federal Association of Retailers (HDE) and the German Fashion Association as sources, aligning with cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (75): The article presents both potential benefits and challenges of the new regulation, mentioning support from industry groups like the German Fashion Association. However, it leans slightly towards positive implications for consumers and the environment, using emotive language such as 'dobro i za okoli

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories