ON
← Back to feed
This video is not real or the earthquake, it was made by AI
CO🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

This video is not real or the earthquake, it was made by AI

An article from La Silla Vacía reports that a circulating video showing a building collapsing during a magnitude 7.4 earthquake in Colombia was created using artificial intelligence (AI). The video, which appeared on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram, has been debunked by fact-checking tools such as Hive Moderation and SynthID, both of which identified AI-generated content with high confidence levels. The article notes that the video includes inconsistencies, such as moving fire trucks, people appearing out of nowhere, and unchanged cars after being crushed. It also references previous false claims about similar videos related to earthquakes in Venezuela. The Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres (Ungrd) reported that over 9,215 homes were destroyed and 140 buildings collapsed in the earthquake. The article emphasizes the importance of verifying information before sharing, especially during crises.

A video circulating online purports to show a building collapsing entirely after the magnitude 7.4 earthquake that struck Colombia on August 10, with its epicenter in San José del Palmar, Chocó. However, this footage has been confirmed to be fabricated using artificial intelligence (AI). According to the latest report from the National Unit for Disaster Risk Management (Ungrd), 9,215 homes have been destroyed and 140 buildings collapsed due to the quake. The Detector of Lies found no reliable records confirming that the video corresponds to one of the affected buildings beyond social media posts. This serves as an initial indication that the images are not real, given that other affected structures have verified records and detailed coverage in the media. The video contains several clues indicating it was generated with AI. For example, a crane from a fire truck moves through the collapsed building and changes position between frames. At times, people appear out of nowhere or change clothes, debris alters while the camera advances, and cars remain undamaged despite appearing crushed under the building. Before the collapse, parts of the structure are already visible as destroyed, yet remnants of those walls do not appear. An analysis using Hive Moderation, a tool detecting AI-generated content, gave a 99.4% probability that the video of the alleged collapse in Colombia was artificially created. Additionally, SynthID, Google's tool for identifying invisible watermarks in AI-created content, also detected signs that the video was made with this technology. The video was posted by accounts known for sharing unverified "breaking news." On YouTube, some of these accounts even indicate that the content was created with AI. The video also circulated following the double earthquakes of magnitudes 7.2 and 7.5 recorded in Venezuela on June 24. At that time, colleagues from La República also verified and concluded the video was false. The Detector of Lies has previously verified other false contents regarding structures affected by the earthquake. These checks can be found here. Another misleading video circulating online shows Taliana Vargas crying, supposedly due to the booing and treatment her husband, Mayor of Cali Alejandro Éder, faced in certain areas of the city while attending to the emergency following the August 10 earthquake. Videos appearing as news suggest that Taliana Vargas broke down in tears because of the booing and mistreatment her husband received in some parts of the city while handling the emergency after the earthquake. One of the videos has over two million views on Instagram alone. However, the video is deceptive. It is neither recent nor related to the earthquake response. Taliana Vargas recorded and published this video on her social media on September 9, 2023, after the then-candidate Alejandro Éder participated in a Youth Forum. The Detector of Lies conducted a search with the keywords "Taliana Vargas crying" and found news articles from reliable media in 2023 featuring the same video currently circulating. These reports state that on September 9, 2023, candidates for the Mayoralty of Cali participated in the closing of the District Youth Forum at the Torre de Cali building. The event ended with shouts and blows, escalating to the point where the location had to be evacuated. Taliana Vargas, Éder’s wife, attended the event with him. After the incident, she posted the video that is now circulating on social media. A search on her X account found the original post. She wrote: "Building a country and Cali from love in difference. No more division and rupture in families, neighborhoods, and cities because we think differently. Aggression does not build and is unacceptable." At the time, Caracol Radio and El Espectador covered the incident. In fact, the Detector of Lies did a verification on what happened and deemed it debatable how the altercation began and who aggressed whom. Therefore, Taliana Vargas' recording has no relation to the August 10 earthquake. During the emergency response, Éder was indeed evacuated from two points in the city on August 11 and 12 after being greeted with boos and having people throw stones and other objects at him. According to the latest report from the National Disaster Risk Management Unit, 273 people died as a result of the August 10 earthquake measuring 7.4 with its epicenter in San José del Palmar, Chocó. Over 3,800 people are injured and 377 are missing. In Cali, the latest report from the City Council counts 96 deaths, 111 missing, 1,401 injured, and 88 rescued people in that city. In another development, a video claiming to show a building collapsing during the earthquake has raised concerns among experts. Meteorologists explained why the devastating earthquake with its epicenter in Chocó felt so strong in Bogotá, Cali, and Medellín. Amid the flood of images, a specific video caught users' attention on X. The clip, posted with the message: "More than a hundred dead in Colombia after the earthquake," shows a building collapsing completely in seconds. Although the origin of the material has not yet been established, it has begun to be flagged on social media as content generated using AI. Given the doubts it raises and the potential impact such images could have during an emergency, SEMANA consulted an expert to verify its authenticity and help prevent the spread of misinformation that could cause fear among the population. Ángel Salazar Velásquez, manager of Engineering for Channels in Latin America at Check Point Software and an AI specialist, analyzed the material in detail and concluded that it was indeed created with AI. He stated, "We can categorically confirm that the audiovisual material in question is not authentic and has been generated using AI tools. In the current landscape of digital threats, the creation and distribution of synthetic content during emergencies represent a severe risk of misinformation." The analysis identified several signals indicating the video is not a real recording but a synthetic montage. One of the main indicators is the physical anomalies and visual errors throughout the images. The structure observed during the supposed collapse exhibits behaviors incompatible with physics. Some elements in the environment, such as vehicles and people, display distorted textures and sudden changes: they appear out of nowhere, deform, or even seem to dissolve. According to the expert, these inconsistencies are characteristic of synthetically generated content and allow identification that the images were not captured by a camera during a real event. The analysis also considered the digital origin of the file. In this case, algorithmic fingerprints associated with artificially generated content were identified, and credentials allowing confirmation that the material corresponded to a naturally captured image with a camera or other device were not found. The circulation of fake images during an emergency can increase confusion and fear among those seeking information about what has occurred. For this reason, it is essential to verify the origin and authenticity of any video before sharing it or presenting it as evidence. In situations like the current one, this type of content circulating on social media should be cross-checked with reports from authorities and official organizations. The recommendation is to avoid amplifying videos whose origin is not confirmed, especially when they might contribute to generating panic or misinformation during the national emergency.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

La Silla Vacía logoLa Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8510 days ago
This video is not real or the earthquake, it was made by AI

An article from La Silla Vacía reports that a circulating video showing a building collapsing during a magnitude 7.4 earthquake in Colombia was created using artificial intelligence (AI). The video, which appeared on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram, has been debunked by fact-checking tools such as Hive Moderation and SynthID, both of which identified AI-generated content with high confidence levels. The article notes that the video includes inconsistencies, such as moving fire trucks, people appearing out of nowhere, and unchanged cars after being crushed. It also references previous false claims about similar videos related to earthquakes in Venezuela. The Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres (Ungrd) reported that over 9,215 homes were destroyed and 140 buildings collapsed in the earthquake. The article emphasizes the importance of verifying information before sharing, especially during crises.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced analysis of the AI-generated video controversy, citing multiple verification tools and sources without overtly favoring any political stance. While discussing the implications of misinformation, it does not take a partisan position but rather focuses on factual debunk

Why factuality (85): This article presents verified statistics from the City Council of Cali regarding casualties, injuries, missing persons, and structural damage. It references official sources and provides detailed numbers that align with cross-source reporting. The content is factual and supported by municipal data.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without emotional language or bias. It focuses on the official updates and does not take a stance beyond what is reported.

La Silla Vacía logoLa Silla VacíaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 8510 days ago
Video of Taliana Vargas crying is old, it's not for earthquake or booing to Éder

The article clarifies that a viral video showing Taliana Vargas crying was not related to the August 10 earthquake in Colombia nor to recent verbal abuse directed at her husband, Alejandro Éder, the mayor of Cali. The video, which has over 2 million views on Instagram, was posted by Vargas on September 9, 2023, after Éder participated in a youth forum where tensions escalated into shouting and physical altercations. The article states that the video does not reflect the current situation involving the earthquake or ongoing incidents against candidates for mayor. It notes that while there were reports of harassment towards Éder during the post-earthquake period, these occurred separately from the forum incident. The article also provides statistics on casualties and injuries from the earthquake.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account by verifying the origin and context of the video, distinguishing between past incidents and current events. While it highlights concerns about violence against political figures, it avoids taking a partisan stance by citing multiple sources and providing both,

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports that the video of Taliana Vargas crying was from September 9, 2023, during the Foro Distrital de Juventudes, not related to the August earthquake. It cites specific dates and references the primary source document indirectly by mentioning the forum. However, it does no

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone overall, presenting facts without overt bias. It clarifies the misleading context of the video and provides background information. However, it uses emotionally charged terms like 'violent' and 'agrediéndonos,' which could be seen as slightly biased toward one pe

Semana logoSemanaIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 8011 days ago
Truth behind viral video of alleged building collapsed by earthquake in Colombia comes to light: expert gives details

The article discusses a viral video circulating on social media that appears to show a building collapsing during a strong earthquake in Colombia. The footage, which claims over 100 deaths, has raised concerns due to its potential to spread misinformation during an emergency. The Colombian newspaper SEMANA consulted an expert to verify the authenticity of the video. Ángel Salazar Velásquez, an expert in AI, confirmed that the video was generated using artificial intelligence tools. He highlighted physical inconsistencies and algorithmic markers that indicate synthetic content rather than a real event. The article emphasizes the risks of such misleading information during crises and the importance of verifying digital content.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account by consulting an expert to verify the authenticity of the video without taking a clear ideological stance. It focuses on the technical aspects of identifying AI-generated content rather than promoting a specific political agenda.

Why factuality (60): This article addresses a completely unrelated topic, eclipses and gravity, which is not connected to the main earthquake event. As such, it does not contribute to the cross-source consensus on the earthquake itself. The factual content is limited and off-topic.

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and informative, discussing the eclipse as a scientific phenomenon. However, since it is unrelated to the main event, it does not meet the criteria for relevance to the task.

Semana logoSemanaIndependentCenterFactual 40Objective 6011 days ago
Eclipse on August 12th, will the Earth lose gravity for seven seconds?

A theory circulating on social media claims that during the total solar eclipse on August 12, Earth will temporarily lose gravity for seven seconds. This claim references a supposed project called 'Project Anchor' but lacks scientific backing or evidence of any official NASA initiative. The U.S. space agency clarified that a solar eclipse cannot cause temporary loss of Earth's gravity, which depends primarily on Earth's mass and remains constant regardless of the Moon's position relative to the Sun. During eclipses, changes in lighting, temperature, and atmospheric conditions occur, but these do not affect gravitational forces. The eclipse path will cover Greenland, Iceland, northern Russia, the Atlantic Ocean, Spain, and parts of Portugal, with partial visibility across Europe, Africa, and North America.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses a scientific phenomenon, solar eclipses, and addresses misinformation about gravity. It provides factual information from NASA and does not take a political stance or show bias toward any side of the issue.

Why factuality (40): This article is unrelated to the event described in the primary source document. It discusses a completely different topic, the solar eclipse of August 12, without any connection to the political incident in Cali. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated for factual alignment with the primary source. The i

Why objectivity (60): The article presents scientific facts in a neutral manner, explaining the lack of evidence for the gravity loss theory. It avoids taking sides and provides clear explanations. However, it lacks relevance to the event described in the primary source, making it difficult to assess objectivity in relat

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories