ON
← Back to feed
Is it good to take out a car loan at 72 and 80 months?; experts warn of financial risks
MX🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

Is it good to take out a car loan at 72 and 80 months?; experts warn of financial risks

The article discusses the increasing trend of automotive financing in Mexico through longer payment terms, such as 72 and 80 months, and warns of associated financial risks. According to data from the Mexican Association of Automobile Distributors (AMDA), loans with terms of 60 and 72 months accounted for 55% of automotive credit by April 2025, up from 43.6% in 2022. Experts like Ken Charles from MStar Financial warn that while extended terms lower monthly payments, they increase overall interest costs, create negative equity, expose borrowers to financial instability, and limit flexibility. The piece highlights potential issues including depreciation of vehicles, difficulty selling before paying off the loan, and exposure to fluctuating interest rates.

In recent years, the trend of financing automobiles over extended periods, up to 80 months, has gained traction among Mexican consumers. According to data from the Mexican Association of Automobile Distributors (AMDA), the share of auto loans with terms of 60 and 72 months rose from 43.6% of all auto credit issuance in 2022 to 52.5% by 2025. Currently, some financial institutions offer options for paying off vehicles within 80 months, though this comes with notable risks. Ken Charles, director digital of the financial institution MStar, warns that financing a car over 80 months can result in lower monthly payments, but it also increases financial risk for the buyer. He explains that while the monthly burden may seem manageable, the overall cost of financing rises significantly due to the longer period. The additional interest paid over time can amount to hundreds of thousands of pesos, depending on the loan size and interest rate. The decision to extend payment terms often reflects broader economic conditions. Following the pandemic, average new vehicle prices in Mexico surged dramatically. Data from JD Power Mexico shows that the average price of a car increased from 161,000 pesos in 2005 to 535,000 pesos in 2025—a rise of 232%. This inflationary pressure has led many buyers to seek longer repayment periods to ease their monthly financial obligations. However, experts caution against the potential pitfalls of such long-term financing. One major concern is the possibility of owing more than the vehicle’s current value. Vehicles typically lose a significant portion of their worth in the early years, especially during the first few years of ownership. With a lengthy loan term, there's a higher chance that the outstanding balance will exceed the car’s resale value, creating negative equity. If the owner needs to sell the vehicle or faces unexpected damage not fully covered by insurance, they could still owe money despite having paid off the loan in full. Another risk involves the stability of the borrower’s financial situation. Committing to a seven- or eight-year payment plan increases exposure to life changes such as job loss, reduced income, medical expenses, or family-related challenges. These unpredictable events can make it difficult to maintain regular payments, potentially leading to default or late fees. Additionally, owners may find themselves facing ongoing maintenance costs even after the loan is fully repaid. Older vehicles require more frequent and expensive repairs, which can overlap with the remaining loan payments. This dual financial burden can strain household budgets, particularly if other expenses increase simultaneously. Long-term financing also limits flexibility. If a consumer wishes to trade in or sell the vehicle before the loan is settled, they may face substantial residual debt. This can complicate the transaction, requiring additional funds or making the sale less attractive to potential buyers. Experts recommend that borrowers carefully evaluate their financial capacity and consider shorter loan terms whenever possible. A 48- to 60-month loan often provides a better balance between manageable monthly payments and reasonable total financing costs. For those who prioritize reducing immediate financial pressure, longer terms should come with a clear understanding of the associated costs and risks. To mitigate these risks, specialists suggest strategies such as increasing the down payment, choosing a shorter repayment period, ensuring the loan allows for prepayment without penalties, maintaining an emergency fund, and comparing the Annualized Total Cost (CTA). These steps can help consumers make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary financial strain.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

El Universal logoEl UniversalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 804 hr. ago
Is it good to take out a car loan at 72 and 80 months?; experts warn of financial risks

The article discusses the increasing trend of automotive financing in Mexico through longer payment terms, such as 72 and 80 months, and warns of associated financial risks. According to data from the Mexican Association of Automobile Distributors (AMDA), loans with terms of 60 and 72 months accounted for 55% of automotive credit by April 2025, up from 43.6% in 2022. Experts like Ken Charles from MStar Financial warn that while extended terms lower monthly payments, they increase overall interest costs, create negative equity, expose borrowers to financial instability, and limit flexibility. The piece highlights potential issues including depreciation of vehicles, difficulty selling before paying off the loan, and exposure to fluctuating interest rates.

Bias read (Center): The article presents balanced information by citing expert opinions and statistical data without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on economic and financial implications rather than taking a partisan stance. While it raises concerns about financial risk, it does not advocate for a左

Why factuality (85): The article cites data from AMDA (Asociación Mexicana de Distribuidores de Automotores) regarding the increase in long-term car loan terms from 2022 to 2025, which supports its factual claims. It also quotes Ken Charles from MStar, providing expert opinion. The information aligns with cross-source c

Why objectivity (80): The article presents both the benefits (lower monthly payments) and risks (higher interest costs, negative equity) of longer-term loans. It uses neutral language and includes expert commentary without overt bias. However, the emphasis on risks may slightly skew the narrative toward caution, though t

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories