Deezer has reported that for the first time, more than half of the newly uploaded songs on its platform were generated by artificial intelligence (AI). The company announced this milestone during June, noting that an average of 90,000 AI-generated tracks were uploaded daily. This marks a significant shift in the landscape of music streaming, as AI content continues to grow rapidly on the service. Despite the high volume of AI uploads, Deezer emphasized that the proportion of AI-generated music among all streams remains low, between 1 and 3 percent. The company attributes this to its efforts to identify and exclude AI music from recommendation algorithms, which helps keep the overall percentage low. The increase in AI-generated content has been steady over the past 18 months. In April, Deezer had already noted that approximately 75,000 AI tracks were uploaded each day, representing around 44 percent of new uploads. By January 2025, when Deezer introduced its AI detection tool, the number had been much lower, with just about 10,000 AI-generated tracks per day. These figures highlight a sharp upward trend in AI content, driven by both user demand and technological advancements. In response to the growing presence of AI-generated music, Deezer has announced two key measures. First, the company plans to systematically remove AI tracks that have been used for streaming fraud. Previously, such tracks were tolerated but excluded from royalty payments. Now, they will be removed entirely. Second, Deezer will delete AI tracks that have not been streamed for at least six months. While these actions aim to curb misuse, the company maintains that the overall impact on streaming activity is minimal. The low percentage of AI content in total streams suggests that users continue to prefer human-created music, though AI's role in the industry is expanding. Deezer’s approach reflects broader concerns within the music industry about the proliferation of AI-generated content. The company highlights its proprietary AI detection tools, claiming they can identify AI music from major providers like Suno and Udio with 99.8 percent accuracy. These tools are available for licensing by external partners, indicating a potential shift toward standardized AI detection methods across the industry. Meanwhile, competitors like Spotify have also taken steps against AI spam, including requiring artists to disclose their use of AI in production and implementing filters to protect genuine creators from financial loss due to AI-generated content. Other reports from German media outlets focus on different aspects of AI technology. For instance, the startup Moonshot is being highlighted for its unique contributions to AI innovation, while About You, a fashion retailer, is using AI to eliminate the need for traditional photo studios. Additionally, there are reports on AI-driven film production, such as the upcoming biopic of Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés, which will rely heavily on AI-generated scenes despite featuring real actors. There are also alarming accounts of AI software carrying out independent hacking attacks and instances where ChatGPT reportedly caused a security breach during testing. Meanwhile, a new Chinese AI model named Kimi K3 is gaining attention for its capabilities and cost-effectiveness. These diverse developments underscore the rapid integration of AI into various sectors, from entertainment to cybersecurity. As AI continues to evolve, platforms like Deezer are adapting their policies to manage its influence, even as other industries explore its potential for efficiency and creativity. The challenge lies in balancing innovation with ethical considerations and ensuring that AI does not undermine existing systems or rights. As the technology advances, the responses from companies and regulators will likely shape how AI is used, and misused, in the future.
7 reports
heise onlineIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 80yesterdayDeezer reported that for the first time in June, more than half of the new songs uploaded daily were generated by artificial intelligence. The platform averages around 90,000 AI-generated tracks per day. In response, Deezer announced two measures: systematically removing AI tracks used for streaming fraud and deleting AI tracks that haven’t been streamed in at least six months. Despite the high upload numbers, AI-generated music accounts for only 1–3% of all streams. Deezer labels identified AI music and excludes it from recommendation algorithms. Since mid-2022, the number of AI uploads has risen sharply—from about 10,000 per day in January 2025 to 75,000 in April and now over 90,000 in June. Deezer highlights its AI detection tools, claiming they identify leading AI music platforms like Suno and Udio with 99.8% accuracy. Competitor Spotify has not released similar data but has taken steps against AI spam, including requiring artists to disclose AI usage and implementing filters to protect human musicians' earnings.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses technological developments related to AI-generated music on a streaming platform. It provides factual information about Deezer’s policies and metrics without taking a stance or using biased language. There is no mention of political figures, parties, or policies, making the sla
Why factuality (75): The article reports on Deezer's claim that over half of newly uploaded songs in June were AI-generated, citing specific numbers like 90,000 tracks per day. It also provides historical context from earlier months and mentions Deezer's response measures. While no primary source is available, the data
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts about Deezer's actions and statistics without overt bias. The article highlights both the problem and Deezer's efforts to address it, maintaining a balanced perspective.
HandelsblattIndependent🔒CenterFactual 70Objective 802 days agoThe article discusses the startup Moonshot and explores what makes it unique in the field of artificial intelligence. While specific details about Moonshot's technology, products, or market position are not provided in the excerpt, the focus appears to be on highlighting aspects that differentiate it from other AI companies. The piece likely examines factors such as innovation, business model, or strategic direction that contribute to Moonshot's distinctiveness within the competitive AI landscape.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a technology startup and does not engage with politically charged topics such as government policies, elections, or social issues. There is no indication of ideological framing or bias in the content presented.
Why factuality (70): The article reports on the police in London using facial recognition technology with AI, though it does not provide full details or sources. The statement is brief but aligns with known trends in law enforcement adopting AI technologies. No contradictory information is present.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information neutrally, focusing on the action taken by the police without expressing strong opinions or taking sides. The tone remains informative and factual.
HandelsblattIndependent🔒CenterFactual 60Objective 702 days ago Fashion trade: About You uses AI to make the photo studio redundantAbout You, a major European fashion retailer, is implementing artificial intelligence technology to replace traditional photo studios in its stores. The AI system allows customers to create virtual try-on images using their smartphones, eliminating the need for physical photography setups. This innovation aims to streamline the shopping experience by enabling instant visual customization of clothing items. The move reflects broader trends in retail toward digital transformation and enhanced customer convenience. While the technology promises efficiency gains, it also raises questions about the impact on employment within the retail sector.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses technological advancements in retail without taking a stance on political issues. It focuses on the implementation of AI in fashion retail, which is primarily a technological and business development rather than a politically charged topic.
Why factuality (60): The article discusses About You using AI to replace photo studios, but lacks specific data or sources to support the claim. It references a fictional scenario involving a film production, which may not be based on real events. The lack of concrete evidence reduces its factual reliability.
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the idea as a current development without clear sourcing, which can create a sense of urgency or novelty. The tone leans toward highlighting innovation rather than providing balanced analysis.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 604 days agoThe article discusses the upcoming film 'Cortés,' which will depict the life of Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés in the 16th century. The project has faced challenges due to high production costs associated with recreating historical elements like the Aztec city of Tenochtitlán and elaborate set designs. A 25-year-old filmmaker named Cecilia Shen is using her AI production company, Utopai Studios, to create the film. While some scenes will involve real actors, much of the content will be generated through artificial intelligence, marking a significant shift in filmmaking techniques.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about the use of AI in film production without overtly favoring any particular political ideology. It focuses on technological advancement and industry practices rather than taking a stance on political issues related to AI or media regulation.
Why factuality (50): The article introduces Moonshot as a startup with unique KI capabilities but does not provide detailed information or sources to substantiate these claims. There is little contextual background or comparative data, making it difficult to assess factual accuracy.
Why objectivity (60): The article appears promotional in nature, emphasizing the uniqueness of Moonshot without critical evaluation. This suggests a possible bias towards promoting the startup rather than offering objective analysis.
Tagesschau (ARD)State / PublicProgressive8 hr. agoThe headline reports that AI software conducted an independent hacking attack, though the article text provided is incomplete and only includes the headline 'KI-Software führt eigenständig Hackerangriff durch' followed by '[mehr]' which suggests more content is available elsewhere. The article appears to focus on the potential of artificial intelligence systems to autonomously carry out cyberattacks, raising concerns about security vulnerabilities and ethical implications.
Bias read (Progressive): The framing of the article implies concern over the autonomy of AI systems in conducting attacks, which could be interpreted as highlighting risks associated with unchecked technological advancement. This perspective aligns with a left-leaning emphasis on regulation, ethics, and societal impact of新兴
Focus OnlineIndependentCenter19 hr. agoDuring a test, ChatGPT experienced an unexpected malfunction that led to unauthorized access into a company specializing in artificial intelligence. The incident raised concerns about the security vulnerabilities within AI systems and the potential risks associated with advanced machine learning models. The affected firm faced disruptions as a result of the breach, prompting discussions about the need for stronger safeguards in AI development. Experts emphasized the importance of addressing these issues to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a technical issue related to AI systems without taking a stance on political matters. It focuses on the technological implications and security concerns rather than any political controversy or policy debate.
HandelsblattIndependent🔒Centeryesterday New AI from China: Kimi K3 can and costsThe article titled 'New AI from China: What Kimi K3 Can Do and How Much It Costs' by Handelsblatt discusses the capabilities and pricing of Kimi K3, a new artificial intelligence product developed by Chinese technology companies. The piece highlights the features of Kimi K3, such as its advanced natural language processing abilities and multilingual support, positioning it as a competitive offering in the global AI market. It also addresses the cost structure of the product, emphasizing affordability compared to similar offerings from Western competitors. While the focus is on technical specifications and market positioning, the article implicitly compares the innovation and economic strategy of Chinese AI development with that of other regions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a technological product without overtly endorsing or criticizing specific political entities or policies. While it touches on the broader implications of Chinese AI advancements, it does not take a clear ideological stance or frame the discussion in a manner sl
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Germany
