This is a duck. I do twice as much as everyone else combined.
The article discusses Branko Grims' response to accusations from the European People's Party (EPP) regarding his low attendance at parliamentary group meetings over two years. Grims claims he has participated in many meetings and was present with Lene Düpont on some occasions, while denying that other EPP members were absent. He argues that the criticism stems from his commitment to defending values he promised voters, including opposing 'LGBTIQ+ indoctrination of children,' advocating for the cessation of green transitions, reducing bureaucratic burdens on businesses, tax cuts, and protecting borders. Grims also criticizes the expansion of EU authority, citing the European Court of Justice’s ruling against Hungary’s child protection law as an example. While he supported a radical right initiative against the European Commission, he later withdrew his signature but was absent during the vote. The article notes his participation in conferences with far-right groups and support for Viktor Orbán’s actions. Grims denies being too right-wing for the European People's Party, insisting he advocates for 'child protection, women's protection, citizen security, economic success, border保护, 和欧
Evropski poslanec Branko Grims (SDS/EPP) je bil uradno izključen iz politične skupine Evropske ljudske stranke (EPP) v Evropskem parlamentu, kar je potrdilo predsedstvo skupine. Odluka je bila predmet predloga, ki bo prihodnjo sredo, 8. julija, glasovala še celotna 180-članska politična skupina. Grims, ki je bil v EPP pod drobnogledom zaradi svojih političnih izborov, je zavračal očitke, da bi bil izključen zaradi pomanjkljive delovne etike, delovanja proti desnosredinskim in evropskim vrednotam ter sodelovanja s skrajno desnico.
Grims je v pogovoru za Radio Ognjišče dejal, da so resnični razlogi za njegovo izključitev politični. Na podlagi svojih besed je razlog očitno v tem, da preveč delo, kar je v nasprotju s stališči skupine. Ključni očitki vključujejo njegovo stališča glede zaščite otrok, migracije in prihodnje ureditve Evropske unije. Grims meni, da se mu očita zavzetost za zaščito otrok pred, po njegovem mnenju, škodljivo LGBT+ ideologijo, ter zavzetost za remigracijo, torej poslaje ilegalne migrantov nazaj tja, od koder so prišli. Prepričan je, da so njegova stališča skladna z veljavnim pravnim redom, posebej z vrednotami, ki jih predstavljajo volivci.
Grims je tudi izrazil nasprotovanje evropskemu zelenemu prehodu, meni, da ta povzroča škodo evropskemu gospodarstvu, in da bi bilo bolje nameniti sredstva družinski politiki in ohranjanju evropskih narodov, kultur in tradicij. Nasprotuje tudi strožji migracijski politiki, vendar meni, da je sodelovanje z drugimi desnimi političnimi skupinami nujno. V svojem pogovoru je poudaril, da je zapisal o tem v svoji knjigi *Zmaga dobrega*, kjer je poudaril, da je to po njem edina pot do rešitve Evrope.
Grims je tudi podprl madžarskega premierja Viktorja Orbana in organiziral dogodek z naslovom *Desni večini v Evropskem parlamentu naproti* skupaj s člani skrajno desne skupine Evropa suverenih narodov (ESN), kar je v skladu z notranjimi pravili EPP. V EPP so mu to prepovedali, ker je bil dogodek v nasprotju z njihovimi smernicami. Grims je tudi izkazal pomanjkanje spoštovanja do evroposlancev EPP iz Madžarske, ker je javno podprl vlado Orbana na škodo stranke Tisza, ki je del EPP.
V pogovoru je Grims izrazil svojo zavezo volivcem in poudaril, da bo vztrajal pri njej. Meni, da je njegova zaveza volivcem velja in da bo brezpogojno vztrajal. V svojem odzivu na družbenih omrežjih je dejal, da je očitno ni problem, da bi delal premalo, ampak je moteče, da delam veliko in dosegam uspehe. Zagonil je, da se bo še naprej boril za Slovenijo.
Grims je tudi podprl pobudo radikalne desnice v Evropskem parlamentu, ki je vložila nezaupnico proti Evropski komisiji. Podpis je sicer umaknil, a namesto da bi glasoval proti nezaupnici, je bil na glasovanju odsoten. Maja letos se je udeležil konference s predstavniki skrajno desnih političnih skupin v Bruslju. Podpiral je Orbána, da je skupaj s poslanci skrajno desne skupine soorganiziral prepovedan dogodek.
Grims se ni strinjal, da bi bil preveč desen za EPP. Meni, da v resnici zagovarja zaščito otrok, zaščito žensk, varnost državljanov, gospodarsko uspešnost, zaščito meja in ohranitev evropskih narodov. V svojem pogovoru je poudaril, da se zavzetost za te vrednote ne sme zamenjati s političnimi izbori.
Vodja EPP Manfred Weber je dejal, da je Grimsovo ravnanje v nasprotju s smernicami skupine, kar je vodilo do sankcij. Grims je zavračal, da bi bil preveč desen, in meni, da je sodelovanje desnosredinskih in desnih strank nujno za prihodnost Evrope.
Postopek izključitve je bil v teku, in predsedstvo EPP je uradno odločitev sprejelo. Prihodnji teden bo o tem glasovala še celotna politična skupina. Pričakovati je, da bo odločitev podprta. Grims se ni strinjal z očitki, da bi bil preveč desen, in meni, da je njegova zaveza volivcem velja. V svojem odzivu je poudaril, da bo brezpogojno vztrajal pri svojih političnih izborih.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The European People's Party (EPP) group in the European Parliament has decided to exclude Branko Grims, an MEP from Slovenia's Social Democrats (SDS), due to poor work ethic. According to sources, Grims has attended only two out of over 100 meetings of the EPP group during his two years as an MEP. He is accused of not contributing to the group's work, criticizing it from outside, and speaking only when cameras are present but not participating in political discussions where positions are formed. The decision to expel him is expected to be finalized by the EPP leadership today and confirmed by the 180-member group through a secret vote next week. This is not the first time EPP has taken action against Grims, who previously supported decisions made by far-right groups within the European Parliament that did not align with EPP's direction.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing sources within the European Parliament and quoting both the EPP representative and Grims' colleague. It does not show overtly biased language or favor one side over the other. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the actions and justifying E
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 88): Very factual with direct quotes from sources. The tone remains mostly objective despite some critical language.
Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedRightFactual 97Objective 9015 hr. ago
The article reports on the formal confirmation by the leadership of the European People's Party (EPP) political group in the European Parliament of the expulsion of Slovenian MEP Branko Grims (SDS/EPP) from the political group. The decision follows allegations against Grims, including collaboration with far-right political groups, signing a non-confidence motion against the European Commission, organizing an event titled 'Right Majority in the European Parliament' alongside members of the Eurosceptic group Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN), publicly supporting Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán ahead of elections, and criticizing the European Court of Justice over Hungary’s child protection law. Grims denies the allegations, claiming they stem from his stance on child protection, migration policies, and his belief in a legal state. He argues that his positions align with the rule of law and criticizes further centralization of the European Union and the decisions of the European Court of Justice. He also opposes the EU's green transition and advocates for stricter immigration policies.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Grims’ alleged actions and beliefs through a lens that emphasizes opposition to progressive values such as LGBTQ+ rights, support for national sovereignty, and criticism of EU institutions. It highlights his alignment with conservative and nationalist positions, particularly his '
Why these scores (Factual 97 · Objective 90): Highly factual with comprehensive details. The tone is neutral and balanced throughout the report.
MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 892 days ago
The article reports that the European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, plans to expel MEP Branko Grims from its ranks due to alleged violations of work ethics and actions contrary to conservative European values. The decision is expected to be finalized today by the EPP presidency, with a vote likely scheduled for next week. Grims, a far-right representative from Slovenia’s SDS party, has previously supported resolutions aligned with far-right groups and was sanctioned in January for not adhering to group guidelines during a vote of no confidence against the European Commission. His participation in a conference with far-right MEPs in Brussels reportedly prompted discussions of further sanctions. EPP leader Manfred Weber criticized Grims' conduct as inconsistent with the group's principles.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents the EPP's stance against Grims as a violation of ethical standards and core values, it does not overtly frame the issue as politically biased. It provides factual accounts of past actions and sanctions, without explicitly endorsing or condemning the EPP's position. The phr
Why these scores (Factual 96 · Objective 89): Offers a balanced view with direct statements from Grims himself. The reporting is factual and maintains a fair tone.
The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, is considering expelling Slovenian MEP Branko Grims due to alleged violations of work ethics and his alignment with far-right political groups. According to sources in the European Parliament, the EPP leadership is expected to make an official decision today, with a vote likely to take place next week. The decision comes after Grims repeatedly supported resolutions and actions by far-right political groups, including signing a motion of no confidence against the European Commission last year, which he later withdrew under pressure from SDS and EPP. Despite this, Grims did not follow the group’s guidelines during another vote, leading to sanctions being imposed on him in January. The EPP leadership has criticized his participation in a conference with far-right representatives and accused him of acting individually. Grims has denied the allegations, stating he sees no justification for sanctions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the conflict: the EPP's accusations of ethical violations and support for far-right groups, and Grims' defense of his actions. While there is clear controversy around Grims’ political affiliations and actions, the reporting does not overtly favor one side over the
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with detailed information about the process and reasons for Grims' potential expulsion. However, some phrases like 'kontinuirano delovanje proti desnosredinskim in evropskim vrednotam' may imply bias.
The European People's Party (EPP), one of the largest groups in the European Parliament, has decided to expel Branko Grims, a Slovenian MEP representing the SDS party, due to alleged violations of work ethics and his alignment with far-right political positions. The decision comes after multiple instances where Grims supported resolutions against the European Commission, which were deemed inconsistent with the EPP’s conservative values. He was previously sanctioned in January for not voting against a motion of no confidence in the Commission, and later participated in a conference with far-right MEPs, prompting further disciplinary action. The EPP leadership, led by Manfred Weber, criticized Grims’ actions as incompatible with group guidelines, while Grims defended his participation as aligned with shared Christian democratic values.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Grims' actions as aligning with 'far-right' and 'extreme right' political stances, which are considered contrary to the EPP's core values. The language used emphasizes his deviation from mainstream conservative principles, portraying him as acting against the interests of the EPP.
Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 84): Well-informed with specific details. Maintains a neutral tone overall, though some phrases suggest a subtle bias.
The European People's Party (EPP), a major group in the European Parliament, has decided to expel MEP Branko Grims from its ranks due to alleged violations of work ethics. The decision stems from Grims' repeated failure to attend internal meetings where he could express his views, while publicly opposing the group’s positions. He has been criticized for aligning with far-right factions within the EPP, supporting policies and parties such as Hungary’s Fidesz and Slovakia’s SNS, which conflict with the EPP’s centrist stance. Grims was previously involved in initiatives and events organized by extreme-right groups and has supported motions against the EU Commission led by far-right politicians. This marks the first time the EPP has expelled an MEP through a vote.
Bias read (Left): The article frames Grims’ actions as ethically unacceptable deviations from the EPP’s mainstream values, emphasizing his alignment with far-right elements and criticism of EU institutions. The narrative portrays him as undermining the group’s integrity and democratic principles, suggesting a left-of
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 83): Provides accurate information with good contextual background. The objectivity is slightly affected by the choice of words used to describe Grims' actions.
The article discusses ongoing disciplinary actions by the European People's Party (EPP) against Slovenian MEP Branko Grims. According to sources in the European Parliament, the EPP leadership is expected to formally decide on his expulsion today, with a vote likely to take place next week. The EPP accuses Grims of violating work ethics and consistently acting against conservative and European values, claiming he does not contribute to the group’s work but rather works against it. This is not the first sanction against Grims; he was previously penalized in January for not voting against a motion of no confidence in Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, which led to a six-month suspension from parliamentary activities. In May, after attending a conference with far-right MEPs, reports emerged that the EPP might impose new sanctions. EPP leader Manfred Weber criticized Grims’ conduct, stating it does not align with the group’s guidelines. Grims has defended his participation, arguing there was no justification for sanctions.
Bias read (Left): The article frames Grims' actions as 'acting against conservative and European values,' implying a left-leaning critique of far-right positions. It emphasizes the EPP's alignment with mainstream conservative values and portrays Grims as deviating from these norms. The focus on his alleged violations
Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 82): Accurate but repetitive of previous reports. Some sections show a slight lean towards the narrative presented by the sources.
The European People's Party (EPP), the largest group in the European Parliament, has decided to exclude Slovenian MEP Gregor Grims from its ranks due to violations of work ethics and actions perceived as contrary to right-center and European values. According to sources within the EPP, Grims has consistently acted against the interests of the group rather than supporting its objectives. This decision follows previous sanctions imposed earlier this year after Grims failed to adhere to the group's guidelines during a vote on distrust towards the European Commission. Additionally, he had previously signed a proposal for distrust but later withdrew his support under pressure from the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) and EPP. Grims defended his actions by stating that the conference he attended aimed to promote fundamental Christian values and European civilization. The EPP leadership emphasized that his behavior did not align with the group's directives.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the EPP's accusations against Grims and his defense of his actions, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring either side. It does not use loaded language or selectively omit context, maintaining neutrality in its reporting.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Contains accurate details but repeats content from other articles. The objectivity score is slightly lower due to repeated biased phrasing.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7518 hr. ago
The leadership of the European People's Party (EPP) has officially confirmed the expulsion of Branko Grims, a Slovenian member of the European Parliament and part of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), from the EPP group. The decision follows allegations against Grims, including poor work ethic, actions contrary to conservative and European values, and collaboration with far-right groups at the expense of the EPP. He is accused of organizing an event with members of the far-right Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN) without approval from the EPP and supporting Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán ahead of parliamentary elections in Hungary, which reportedly harmed the interests of an EPP-affiliated party. Additionally, he criticized the European Court of Justice after it ruled against a Hungarian law protecting children, which was deemed incompatible with EU law. The full EPP group will vote on his expulsion in a secret ballot later this week.
Bias read (Center): The article presents accusations made by the EPP against Branko Grims but does not take a clear stance on whether these claims are valid or biased. It reports both the charges and Grims' response, providing a balanced view of the situation without overtly favoring either side.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): While providing accurate information, the article shows a clear bias towards portraying Grims negatively, affecting its objectivity score significantly.
The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, is considering expelling Slovenian MEP Branko Grims (SDS) due to alleged violations of work ethics and his alignment with far-right political groups. According to sources within the European Parliament and confirmed by SDS, the process is underway, with a final decision expected soon. The EPP claims Grims has consistently criticized and undermined the group’s values and does not contribute to its work, participating in only two out of over 100 meetings during his tenure. His participation in a conference with far-right groups like ECR, ESN, and PfE led to criticism from EPP leader Manfred Weber, who stated such collaboration was not aligned with EPP principles. Grims denies the allegations, arguing that cooperation on defending core values is standard practice and rejecting the label of 'extreme right' as inappropriate.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Branko Grims’ actions as aligning with 'far-right' groups and criticizes his participation in conferences with such groups, which are generally associated with right-wing politics. The EPP leadership labels this behavior as against their values, implying a conservative or right-of
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 80): This article provides a thorough account of the situation, including Grims' denial and his arguments. It cites multiple sources and maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting both sides of the issue fairly.
The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, plans to expel Slovenian MEP Branko Grimsa from the group due to alleged violations of work ethics and his continued collaboration with far-right political factions. According to sources in the European Parliament, Grimsa has repeatedly supported decisions and actions by far-right political groups that contradict the EPP’s conservative orientation. The EPP leadership claims he does not contribute to the group’s work but rather acts against it. The formal decision to expel Grimsa is expected to be made today, with a vote likely to take place next week. This is not the first sanction against Grimsa, who was previously penalized in January 2026 after supporting a motion against the European Commission that was linked to controversial political issues.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Grimsa's actions as 'collaboration with far-right' and 'acting against the EPP,' which aligns with the right-wing values of the EPP. The emphasis on his support for far-right groups and the portrayal of his behavior as contrary to the group's principles suggests a right-leaning sl
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 78): The article presents the facts clearly, mentioning the process and reasons for Grims' potential expulsion. It includes quotes from EPP officials and mentions prior actions against Grims. The objectivity is strong, though there is a slight emphasis on the EPP's position.
The article discusses the growing rift between Slovenian MEP Branko Grims and the leadership of the European People's Party (EPP), leading to potential expulsion from the group. The EPP is considering expelling Grims, which would make him the first member of the largest political group in the European Parliament to be expelled under such circumstances. Delov dopisnik Peter Žerjavič explains the reasons behind this decision, highlighting the increasing divergence between Grims and the party leadership. The situation reflects deeper tensions within the EPP regarding acceptable political behavior.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the conflict between Grims and the EPP leadership, focusing on the reported reasons for the potential expulsion without overtly favoring either side. It cites a journalist’s explanation rather than taking a partisan stance, maintaining neutrality in its报道.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Factuality is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on Grims' potential expulsion from EPP. Objectivity is moderate with some biased language regarding Grims' actions.
The article discusses Branko Grims' response to accusations from the European People's Party (EPP) regarding his low attendance at parliamentary group meetings over two years. Grims claims he has participated in many meetings and was present with Lene Düpont on some occasions, while denying that other EPP members were absent. He argues that the criticism stems from his commitment to defending values he promised voters, including opposing 'LGBTIQ+ indoctrination of children,' advocating for the cessation of green transitions, reducing bureaucratic burdens on businesses, tax cuts, and protecting borders. Grims also criticizes the expansion of EU authority, citing the European Court of Justice’s ruling against Hungary’s child protection law as an example. While he supported a radical right initiative against the European Commission, he later withdrew his signature but was absent during the vote. The article notes his participation in conferences with far-right groups and support for Viktor Orbán’s actions. Grims denies being too right-wing for the European People's Party, insisting he advocates for 'child protection, women's protection, citizen security, economic success, border保护, 和欧
Bias read (Right): The article frames Grims' actions and positions through a right-leaning lens, emphasizing his opposition to leftist policies like 'LGBTIQ+ indoctrination,' support for conservative values, and alignment with far-right initiatives. It highlights his defense of national sovereignty and traditional价值观,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): Factuality is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on Grims' potential expulsion from EPP. Objectivity is lower due to emotionally charged language and lack of balance in presenting both sides of the story.
The European People's Party (EPP) group in the European Parliament has decided to expel Branko Grims, a member of the EPP/SDS faction, due to inadequate work ethics. According to sources within the European Parliament, Grims had already received several warnings prior to this decision. The expulsion highlights internal disciplinary actions taken by the EPP group against one of its members.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on an official decision made by the EPP group regarding the expulsion of Branko Grims. It presents the action factually without overtly favoring any side, providing information based on sources within the European Parliament. There is no evident framing that leans toward either a
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): Factuality is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on Grims' potential expulsion from EPP. Objectivity is lower due to emotionally charged language and lack of balance in presenting both sides of the story.
Slovenske noviceIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 60yesterday
Branko Grims, a member of the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) and part of the European People's Party (EPP) group in the European Parliament, is facing potential expulsion from the EPP due to alleged violations of ethical standards and alignment with far-right values. The EPP has accused him of undermining the values of the center-right and Europe by attending events organized by far-right groups such as 'Evropa suverenih narodov' and supporting policies that conflict with the EPP's stance. Grims has previously received warnings within the EPP and was sanctioned in January for not adhering to group guidelines during votes related to distrust of the European Commission. He attended a pro-right event in May where he spoke alongside members of three far-right European parties. The final decision on his expulsion will be made by the EPP group in a vote next week.
Bias read (Left): The article frames Grims as someone who undermines European and center-right values through associations with far-right groups and actions contrary to EPP principles. It emphasizes the EPP’s disciplinary action against him, suggesting a critical view of his behavior and alignment with far-right ide
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): Factuality is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on Grims' potential expulsion from EPP. Objectivity is lower due to emotionally charged language and lack of balance in presenting both sides of the story.
Branko Grims, a member of the European Parliament representing Slovenia, has responded to allegations of poor work ethic that could lead to his expulsion from the European People's Party (EPP). He defended his efforts by citing a positive evaluation he received from Elon Musk, stating that such recognition from a prominent global figure proves his hard work and achievements. Grims emphasized that he remains committed to his values, including opposition to what he calls 'LGBT+ indoctrination' of children, support for the deportation of illegal migrants, and criticism of the EU's bureaucratic processes. According to sources within the EPP, Grims is being excluded due to his lack of participation in group activities and his external criticism of the party. The process for his removal is ongoing and expected to conclude soon.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Grims' actions and views as aligned with right-wing and nationalist positions, emphasizing his opposition to certain progressive policies and alignment with traditional conservative values. The tone supports his stance against alleged 'indoctrination,' migration policies, and EU '
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): Factuality is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on Grims' potential expulsion from EPP. Objectivity is lower due to emotionally charged language and lack of balance in presenting both sides of the story.
The article discusses the potential expulsion of politician Gregor Grimes from the European People's Party (EPP) due to alleged violations of work ethics and ideological deviations. The EPP's spokesperson, Daniel Köster, confirmed that the process is ongoing and expects an official decision today, with a final vote by the 180-member group next week. Grimes is accused of not attending meetings, acting against conservative and European values, and failing to contribute to the group’s work. The EPP has criticized his behavior as detrimental to the organization. Grimes has not yet responded to the request for comment.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the EPP's stance on Grimes' conduct without overtly endorsing or condemning it. It reports allegations made by the EPP but does not take a clear partisan position. While the issue is politically sensitive, the framing remains balanced between the accusations and the lack of a回应.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): Factuality is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on Grims' potential expulsion from EPP. Objectivity is lower due to emotionally charged language and lack of balance in presenting both sides of the story.
The European People's Party (EPP) group in the European Parliament plans to exclude Branko Grims, a Slovenian member of the SDS parliamentary group, due to poor work ethics. According to EPP spokesperson Daniel Köster, Grims has attended only two out of over 100 meetings during his two years as an MEP and has not contributed to the group's work, instead criticizing it from outside. The EPP leadership is expected to formally approve the decision today, with the 180-member group set to vote on it secretly next week. Grims has previously supported resolutions by far-right groups that contradict EPP values but later withdrew his support under pressure from SDS and EPP. He was also warned by EPP leadership for not attending another vote on distrust toward the European Commission.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the accusations against Grims and his defense, including quotes from EPP representatives and Grims' actions. It does not favor one side over the other and provides balanced information about the situation.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): Factuality is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on Grims' potential expulsion from EPP. Objectivity is lower due to emotionally charged language and lack of balance in presenting both sides of the story.
The European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament, is considering expelling Slovenian MEP Branko Grims due to alleged violations of work ethics and his perceived opposition to conservative values. The EPP claims Grims has been inactive by attending fewer than two out of over 100 meetings during his time as an MEP and criticizes him for undermining the group’s work. Grims denies these allegations, stating he has participated in more than 30 international conferences and fulfilled his commitment to voters by advocating for freedom of speech and protecting national interests. He argues that his efforts align with his campaign promises and that critics should question their own stance if they find fault.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the conflict: the EPP's accusations against Grims and Grims' defense of his actions. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing, as the reporting remains balanced between the formal charges and Grims’ rebuttals. Neither side appears to dominate the tone or
Why these scores (Factual 83 · Objective 79): The article accurately reports the situation and includes statements from EPP representatives. It also notes Grims' absence from meetings and his participation in conferences. The tone is generally neutral but slightly favors the EPP perspective.
The European People's Party (EPP) is reportedly considering expelling Branko Grimsa, a Slovenian MEP from the SDS party, due to alleged poor work ethic, actions against 'right-center and European values,' and sympathy for 'far-right' political groups opposed to the EPP. The EPP leadership plans to decide on his expulsion today, while the EPP political group will vote on the matter next Wednesday in Strasbourg. According to EPP sources, Grimsa has been sanctioned within the group for not aligning with its interests, such as signing a motion of distrust against the European Commission proposed by a Romanian MEP from the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group, though he later withdrew the signature under pressure from SDS and EPP. Additionally, Grimsa attended a conference with representatives of political groups labeled as 'far-right.' Roman Tomc, one of the EPP's deputy presidents, expressed regret over the situation, stating that all efforts were made to avoid it, and emphasized that the final decision will be made by the entire EPP political group during the vote.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing sources within the EPP and quoting Roman Tomc's comments. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on reported actions and decisions rather than taking a stance on whether they are,
Why these scores (Factual 82 · Objective 76): The article gives a comprehensive overview of the situation, including Grims' actions and responses from EPP officials. It maintains a balanced tone but focuses more on the EPP's stance than on Grims' defense.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
