ON
← Back to feed
Dismissal at the FIFA World Cup studio: The game is over!
Germany🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressiveyesterday

Dismissal at the FIFA World Cup studio: The game is over!

The article discusses the failure of the FIFA World Cup video game launched by the FIFA and Delphi Interactive, which was made available via Netflix's cloud gaming platform. The game, titled 'FIFA World Cup: Launch Edition,' was criticized for being outdated and lacking quality, despite FIFA's claims of setting new standards. Shortly after its release in June, the development studio Refractor Games, which worked on the game, laid off 85% of its staff, with some reports indicating the entire studio might be dissolved. This follows a trend of layoffs in the gaming industry, particularly when games fail to meet financial expectations. The article also notes broader issues within the football world, including FIFA President Gianni Infantino's recent struggles with selling World Cup rights and allegations of withholding prize money from Jordan's team.

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

heise online logoheise onlineIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 75yesterday
FIFA World Cup: Studio behind Netflix game fires 85 percent of the team

Das US-Entwicklerstudio Refactor Games hat 85 Prozent seines Teams entlassen, bestätigte Gründer Nathan Burba gegenüber GamesBeat. Das Studio war gemeinsam mit Delphi Interactive für das Fußballspiel „FIFA World Cup: Launch Edition“ für Netflix verantwortlich. Laut Insider Gaming wurden etwa 80 Mitarbeiter betroffen, und das Team wurde am 31. Juli über die Entlassung informiert, ohne Abfindung. Delphi Interactive stellte die Finanzierung ein. Kritiker sowie heise online werteten das Spiel negativ, was auf mangelnde Qualität hindeutete. Netflix lobte das Spiel jedoch als erfolgreiches Cloud-Gaming-Debüt und hält es weiterhin im Abo bereit. Der Launch war zeitkritisch, da er zur WM starten musste, und das Spiel wurde als reduzierte Version präsentiert.

Bias read (Center): Die Berichterstattung bleibt sachlich und neutral, ohne klare politische Einflussnahme. Es wird keine parteipolitische Haltung oder ideologische Prägung erkennbar. Die Bewertung des Spiels erfolgt durch externe Quellen wie Kritiker und heise online, während Netflix selbst positives Feedback gibt. Es

Why factuality (90): The article provides accurate information from reliable sources like GamesBeat and Inside Gaming regarding the layoffs and reasons behind them. It clearly states the role of Delphi Interactive and Netflix, matching the primary source document.

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone overall but includes some criticism of the game's performance relative to EA's offerings. It avoids overtly emotional language but does present a somewhat critical perspective on the game's success.

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 65yesterday
Dismissal at the FIFA World Cup studio: The game is over!

The article discusses the failure of the FIFA World Cup video game launched by the FIFA and Delphi Interactive, which was made available via Netflix's cloud gaming platform. The game, titled 'FIFA World Cup: Launch Edition,' was criticized for being outdated and lacking quality, despite FIFA's claims of setting new standards. Shortly after its release in June, the development studio Refractor Games, which worked on the game, laid off 85% of its staff, with some reports indicating the entire studio might be dissolved. This follows a trend of layoffs in the gaming industry, particularly when games fail to meet financial expectations. The article also notes broader issues within the football world, including FIFA President Gianni Infantino's recent struggles with selling World Cup rights and allegations of withholding prize money from Jordan's team.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a failure of FIFA's initiatives, suggesting a lack of oversight and accountability. It criticizes the organization's management decisions and highlights systemic issues within the football governance structure, aligning more with left-leaning critiques of power im

Why factuality (85): The article reports accurately on the layoffs at Refactor Games, citing multiple sources including GamesBeat and Inside Gaming. It mentions the collaboration with Delphi Interactive and Netflix, aligning with the primary source document. However, it includes subjective commentary on the quality of t

Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat critical of the game's quality, using hyperbolic language ('Seelenlosigkeit', '0,33-Gilde-Buddel') which introduces bias. While reporting facts objectively, the article leans towards a negative assessment of the game's reception.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories