ON
← Back to feed
Elon Musk: Commission accepts proposed changes to X
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 hr. ago

Elon Musk: Commission accepts proposed changes to X

Elon Musks social media platform X has reached an agreement with the European Commission regarding proposed changes aimed at addressing violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA). The approved measures aim to increase transparency within the network, according to the Brussels-based authority. This follows a 120 million euro fine imposed by the EU in December over breaches of the DSA, including misleading user account verification practices. After acquiring X, Musk introduced a system where all paying subscription customers received a checkmark, rather than only verified users, which was deemed non-compliant with EU regulations. X has since clarified that these checkmarks no longer equate to verification and now refers to them as a premium status. The EU also accused X of withholding data from researchers and failing to document advertising practices transparently. X has six months to implement the agreed-upon changes, after which it will face intensified oversight.

The European Commission has accepted proposed changes from Elon Musk's social media platform X, following a major fine imposed earlier this year over violations of EU rules. The approved measures aim to increase transparency within the network, according to a statement from the Brussels-based authority. This marks a key step forward in aligning with the requirements set by the Digital Services Act (DSA). The adjustments will help X meet the transparency obligations outlined in the DSA. In December, the EU levied a €120 million penalty against X for breaching the DSA, including issues related to misleading user account verification through the white checkmark on a blue background. After acquiring X, Musk introduced a policy allowing all paying subscription customers to receive a checkmark, rather than reserving it for users verified by the company. This move was deemed non-compliant with EU regulations. Following the fine, X publicly clarified that the checkmarks no longer equated to verification. The platform now refers to them as a premium status. The EU Commission had also accused X of withholding data from researchers and failing to document advertising practices transparently. X has indicated plans to make changes in these areas, which the Brussels regulators have initially accepted. According to a statement, X now has six months to implement these changes. Until then, the platform will face enhanced oversight. The December fine marked the first time the EU Commission applied penalties under the DSA, which came into effect in 2024. The regulation imposes stricter requirements on online platforms, mandating better handling of user complaints, faster removal of illegal content, and stronger protections for children. Musk expressed frustration with the fine last year, stating on his platform that the EU should be abolished and that sovereignty should be returned to individual countries. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio commented on X that the action represented an attack on American tech platforms and citizens by foreign governments. Since February 2024, the DSA has been in force in Germany, imposing more stringent rules on online platforms. These changes include clearer procedures for addressing user concerns, quicker takedowns of unlawful material, and improved safeguards for minors. Experts such as digital analyst Svea Windwehr have explained how these new regulations affect the operations of online services. X faces ongoing scrutiny from regulatory bodies as it works to comply with the DSA. The platform must demonstrate progress within the given timeframe while maintaining its position as one of the world’s largest social networks. Compliance efforts are expected to influence future interactions between X and European authorities, particularly regarding data access and advertising transparency. The acceptance of X's proposed changes signals a temporary resolution to some of the immediate compliance issues raised by the EU. However, the platform remains under close watch, with further actions likely depending on its ability to fully meet the DSA's requirements within the specified period.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Der Spiegel logoDer SpiegelIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 756 hr. ago
Elon Musk: Commission accepts proposed changes to X

Elon Musks social media platform X has reached an agreement with the European Commission regarding proposed changes aimed at addressing violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA). The approved measures aim to increase transparency within the network, according to the Brussels-based authority. This follows a 120 million euro fine imposed by the EU in December over breaches of the DSA, including misleading user account verification practices. After acquiring X, Musk introduced a system where all paying subscription customers received a checkmark, rather than only verified users, which was deemed non-compliant with EU regulations. X has since clarified that these checkmarks no longer equate to verification and now refers to them as a premium status. The EU also accused X of withholding data from researchers and failing to document advertising practices transparently. X has six months to implement the agreed-upon changes, after which it will face intensified oversight.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, detailing both the actions taken by X and the responses from the European Commission. It does not exhibit clear bias toward either side, providing factual information about the regulatory actions and X's compliance efforts.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that the European Commission accepted X’s corrective measures to comply with the Digital Services Act. It mentions the 120 million euro fine from December, the issue with verification icons, and the proposed changes to increase transparency. However, it does not fully

Why objectivity (75): The tone is generally neutral but leans slightly towards portraying X’s actions as a positive step, using phrases like 'ein wichtiger Schritt in die richtige Richtung.' While it presents facts objectively, there is a subtle implication that X is making progress, which could be seen as a slight edito

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories