ON
← Back to feed
The Supreme Court rejects that the sentence of Ábalos violates the presumption of innocence of Pardo de Vera
Spain🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

The Supreme Court rejects that the sentence of Ábalos violates the presumption of innocence of Pardo de Vera

The Spanish Supreme Court has rejected a request by former Adif president Isabel Pardo de Vera to annul a sentence against José Luis Ábalos, Koldo García, and Víctor de Aldama. Pardo de Vera argued that the court’s ruling included 'affirmations' suggesting her guilt, despite her not being part of the case. The court dismissed her appeal, stating that the statements were limited to evaluating her testimony as a witness and did not constitute a judgment against her. Her defense claims that the ruling went beyond necessary context and violated her presumption of innocence and right to defense by implying her involvement in the alleged misconduct related to the hiring of Jessica Rodríguez. They argue that the court's findings about her actions were unnecessary for justifying the convictions of the others involved.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

El País logoEl PaísIndependent🔒Center4 hr. ago
The Supreme Court rejects that the sentence of Ábalos violates the presumption of innocence of Pardo de Vera

The Spanish Supreme Court has rejected a request by former Adif president Isabel Pardo de Vera to annul a sentence against José Luis Ábalos, Koldo García, and Víctor de Aldama. Pardo de Vera argued that the court’s ruling included 'affirmations' suggesting her guilt, despite her not being part of the case. The court dismissed her appeal, stating that the statements were limited to evaluating her testimony as a witness and did not constitute a judgment against her. Her defense claims that the ruling went beyond necessary context and violated her presumption of innocence and right to defense by implying her involvement in the alleged misconduct related to the hiring of Jessica Rodríguez. They argue that the court's findings about her actions were unnecessary for justifying the convictions of the others involved.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the court's decision and the defense's arguments without overtly favoring either side. It reports the legal reasoning of the Supreme Court and the concerns raised by Pardo de Vera's defense, maintaining a balanced tone. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing of

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories