Judge Peinado's 'justified' risk of Begoña Gómez's possible escape: eight presidents and ministers fled from Justice thanks to police and escorts
Judge Juan Carlos Peinado suggested that police officers assigned to protect Begoña Gómez, wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, might assist her in a hypothetical escape, either voluntarily or under orders from their superiors. This statement sparked outrage among police unions, who demanded Peinado retract his comments, arguing they undermined the professionalism of law enforcement. The Ministry of the Interior formally complained to Spain’s Supreme Court, which referred the matter to disciplinary authorities to assess whether Peinado’s remarks constituted serious misconduct. While Peinado’s claim has historical parallels—such as Carles Puigdemont’s 2017 escape from Spain with the help of Catalan police—these cases involve different legal contexts. Puigdemont fled after Catalonia’s illegal referendum and declaration of independence, evading arrest with assistance from police before being detained in Germany in 2018. Though he was later released and returned to Belgium, he remains outside Spain and has not been tried. In August 2024, Puigdemont briefly appeared in Barcelona using a vehicle linked to a Catalan police officer, leading to an investigation into three officers.
On June 24, 2026, Judge Juan Carlos Peinado ordered the delivery of her passport by Begoña Gómez, wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, as part of precautionary measures in the ongoing investigation into alleged corruption involving her and others. This development occurred on the same day that Sánchez was scheduled to address the Congress of Deputies regarding recent judicial investigations affecting high-profile figures such as former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and former socialist militant Leire Díez. The timing of these events has been interpreted by some as a strategic move by Peinado to escalate pressure on the government, particularly given the political sensitivity surrounding the cases under scrutiny.
The judge's decision came after a ruling on Saturday, which also included sending Gómez to trial before a jury on four charges: influence peddling, corruption in business dealings, misappropriation, and misuse of public funds. Alongside Gómez, her advisor in the Moncloa, Cristina Álvarez, was also cited for similar charges. Both were required to appear before the court twice monthly and had their passports confiscated. Additionally, they were asked to disclose any additional passports they might possess, including diplomatic or foreign ones. These measures were justified by Peinado based on the severity of the potential penalties and the risk of flight, despite Gómez’s police protection.
In response to Peinado’s ruling, the Government spokesperson and Minister of Migration, Elma Saiz, criticized the judge’s actions without explicitly naming him. She described the process against Gómez as "anomalous and erratic," suggesting that it lacked clarity and justification. Saiz emphasized the need for justice and truth to prevail, expressing solidarity with Gómez while acknowledging the ongoing challenges she faces. Meanwhile, the police expressed concern over Peinado’s suggestion that their agents could assist Gómez in fleeing, calling his remarks unjustified and damaging to their professional reputation.
The Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) convened an emergency meeting to assess whether disciplinary action should be taken against Peinado for his comments about the police. The president of the CGPJ, Isabel Perelló, supported initiating proceedings against Peinado, citing possible violations of the Organic Law of the Judiciary. However, conservative members of the council opposed this approach, arguing that the matter should be resolved through ordinary legal channels rather than judicial intervention. Despite this division, the CGPJ agreed to allow the promoter of the disciplinary case, Ricardo Conde, to investigate further.
Peinado’s decision to send Gómez to trial has significant implications for the upcoming general elections in July 2027. Legal experts note that the typical timeframe between the opening of a trial and its actual commencement is around six months, though delays due to summer recess or other factors could extend this period. The trial will likely take place before the elections, potentially influencing public perception and political dynamics. Additionally, Peinado has initiated a separate investigation into alleged misconduct related to a contract awarded to Juan Carlos Barrabés, a businessman associated with Gómez. This new probe does not affect the main case against Gómez but adds another layer of complexity to the overall situation.
The broader context of these developments includes growing tensions between the executive branch and the judiciary. The government has accused Peinado of pursuing a vendetta against Gómez, emphasizing that his actions reflect an obsession rather than a legitimate pursuit of justice. Conversely, supporters of the judiciary argue that Peinado is upholding the rule of law and ensuring accountability for serious allegations. As the legal processes unfold, both sides continue to assert their positions, with the outcome of the trials and any disciplinary actions against Peinado remaining uncertain.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
left
center
right
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has ordered Begoña Gómez, wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, to surrender her passport by Wednesday evening as part of precautionary measures in her ongoing trial. This comes amid investigations into alleged corruption involving former President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and a plumber linked to the PSOE party, Leire Díez. The same order applies to Gómez’s advisor, Cristina Álvarez, who was also cited for the same reason. Meanwhile, Sánchez is set to address the Congress regarding these legal developments and recent European Council meetings. Government spokesperson Elma Saiz criticized the judicial process against Gómez, calling it 'anomalous' and suggesting it reflects an endless campaign against her.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the judicial actions against Begoña Gómez and her advisor as politically motivated persecution, using terms like 'persecution,' 'campaign of wear down,' and 'no limits.' It emphasizes the political implications of the case, highlights criticism from the government side, and omits,
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides clear factual details about the legal proceedings involving Begoña Gómez and the judge's actions, maintaining a neutral and objective tone.
elDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 6013 days ago
Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has ordered Begoña Gómez, wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, and her assistant Cristina Álvarez to surrender their passports during a court hearing on June 24, the same day Sánchez is set to address the Congress of Deputies regarding recent corruption cases involving former Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and socialist activist Leire Díez. The judge cited concerns over potential flight risks based on the severity of the alleged crimes and possible connections to other individuals involved. This decision follows a request by the far-right group HazteOir, which had asked for Gómez’s passport to be revoked and for her to appear before the court every 15 days. The judge argued that even with police protection, there was a risk that officers might assist in her escape. The National Police described this reasoning as 'unjustified.'
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about judicial actions taken against high-profile political figures without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from the judge and mentions opposing viewpoints, such as the police's criticism of the reasoning, indicating an attempt at balance
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 60): The article accurately reports on the legal action taken by Judge Peinado against Begoña Gómez and provides details of the court proceedings. However, it presents the government's response in a highly emotional and politically charged tone, suggesting a lack of objectivity.
20minutosIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8512 days ago
The assistant of Begoña Gómez has voluntarily handed over her passport to Judge Peinado ahead of schedule. This action likely relates to an ongoing legal investigation or judicial process involving Begoña Gómez, who is a prominent figure in Spanish politics. The early submission of the passport could indicate cooperation with authorities or compliance with court orders. Such actions are often taken during legal proceedings to facilitate travel restrictions or investigations. The specific reasons for this preemptive measure have not been detailed in the provided text.
Bias read (Center): The article reports a factual event—handing over a passport—without apparent ideological framing, loaded language, or selective sourcing. It does not present a clear bias toward any political side but focuses on the procedural aspect of the act itself.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article states that Begoña Gómez's advisor handed over her passport to the judge preemptively. This is straightforward and matches the consensus among other sources.
El PaísIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 8513 days ago
The Spanish Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) has decided to allow the promoter of the disciplinary action, Ricardo Conde, to decide whether to open an investigation against Judge Juan Carlos Peinado. This follows Peinado's statement in a judicial resolution suggesting that the police guards assigned to Begoña Gómez, wife of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, could assist her in evading justice. The decision was made during an emergency meeting with the vote of the council's president, Isabel Perelló. The move comes amid ongoing scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest involving high-profile individuals.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the procedural steps taken by the CGPJ in response to a judicial statement without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the formal process and includes the involvement of key figures without apparent ideological framing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports the CGPJ's decision to let Ricardo Conde decide on disciplinary action against Peinado. It remains neutral in tone and aligns with the cross-source consensus.
20minutosIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8513 days ago
The Spanish Supreme Court's Judicial Council (CGPJ) has indicated that it may open an investigation against Judge José Manuel Peinado for suggesting that the bodyguards of Begoña Gómez could have assisted her in fleeing. This comes after Peinado made comments implying that the security personnel might have played a role in helping Gómez evade capture. The CGPJ is considering whether these remarks constitute a breach of judicial conduct or ethics. The case has sparked debate over the independence of the judiciary and the handling of high-profile legal cases in Spain.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, mentioning the potential disciplinary action against the judge and the context of his remarks without overtly favoring any side. It does not use emotionally charged language or selectively present information to support a particular viewpoint.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article reports that the CGPJ is considering disciplinary action against Judge Peinado for suggesting the escort might help Gómez flee. This aligns with other sources and is presented neutrally.
RTVE NoticiasState / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 8513 days ago
The Spanish Supreme Court's Judicial Council (CGPJ) has initiated an administrative process against Judge José Manuel Peinado for comments he made suggesting that the police could have assisted Begoña Gómez in fleeing after her arrest. The remarks were made during a hearing related to the case involving former Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy. Peinado's comments sparked controversy and led to calls for disciplinary action against him. The CGPJ is now evaluating whether to formally reprimand or sanction Peinado for his alleged misconduct.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the initiation of an administrative process by the CGPJ against Judge Peinado in a neutral manner, without overtly favoring either side. It reports the facts without apparent editorializing or biased language, focusing on the procedural steps taken by the judicial authority.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article confirms the CGPJ is initiating a process to discipline Judge Peinado for implying police assistance in Gómez's potential escape. It is consistent with other reports and remains objective.
elDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8514 days ago
The permanent commission of the Supreme Court's Council (CGPJ) held an emergency meeting on Sunday following a complaint from the Minister of the Interior, Fernando Grande-Marlaska, requesting disciplinary action against Judge Juan Carlos Peinado. The meeting was called after Peinado issued an order sending Begoña Gómez, the partner of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, to trial and suggested her bodyguards could assist her in a potential escape. The CGPJ will meet again on Monday to decide whether to open a disciplinary case against Peinado.
Bias read (Center): The article presents facts without overtly biased language or framing. It reports on the judicial process and the actions taken by the CGPJ in response to a ministerial request. There is no clear ideological slant in the wording or emphasis.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article details the CGPJ's urgent meeting regarding possible disciplinary action against Judge Peinado. It is factual and aligns with other sources, maintaining neutrality.
RTVE NoticiasState / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 8514 days ago
The extraordinary meeting of Spain's Judicial Council (CGPJ), chaired by President Begoña Gómez, concluded without an agreement on how to respond to a ruling issued by Judge Peinado regarding Gómez herself. The council was convened to assess the judge's decision, but no consensus was reached on whether to take disciplinary action against him. This development highlights ongoing tensions within Spain's judiciary system, particularly concerning internal governance and accountability mechanisms.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a judicial council meeting that failed to reach a decision on disciplinary action against a judge. It presents the situation factually without overtly favoring any side, providing minimal context beyond the event itself. There is no clear ideological framing or biased language
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article notes that the CGPJ meeting ended without an agreement on whether to discipline Judge Peinado. This is consistent with other sources and presented objectively.
El MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 8515 days ago
The Madrid Provincial Court has set a timeline for the trial of Begoña Gómez, wife of Spain’s Prime Minister, which could take place before the general elections scheduled for July 2027. The court typically takes six months from the issuance of the trial order to hold the proceedings, though delays may occur due to summer holidays or the workload of the assigned judge. Judicial sources suggest that the trial might be scheduled for early spring 2027, possibly considering the upcoming election period. The case is currently under review by Section 23 of the Madrid Provincial Court, which is expected to rule on appeals within three months. Additionally, Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has initiated a separate investigation into alleged misconduct involving Red.es, a state-owned entity, linked to Juan Carlos Barrabés, a businessman associated with Begoña Gómez.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of judicial procedures and timelines related to a high-profile political case. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The information is presented neutrally, focusing on legal processes and potential influences on a
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Provides detailed procedural information about the judicial timeline and potential trial dates. Neutral tone and factual reporting align with cross-source consensus on legal processes.
El MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 8516 days ago
Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has initiated a new investigation in the 'Begoña case,' focusing on alleged misconduct in a contract awarded to Juan Carlos Barrabés. The investigation follows a report from the European Prosecution Office based on an UCO (National Anti-Corruption Unit) report, which identified irregularities in the awarding of a four-million-euro contract by the public entity Red.es. The report suggests that the requirements for the bid were not properly evaluated, potentially leading to an unfair award.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on judicial actions and findings from official sources such as the European Prosecution Office and the UCO. There is no clear indication of favoring one side over another in the legal process.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article describes the new investigation by Judge Peinado related to alleged fraud involving Barrabés. It is factual and consistent with other reports, remaining neutral in tone.
20minutosIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 8015 days ago
The Spanish government, through the Moncloa Palace, has responded to a court order issued by Judge Peinado, which mandates that Begoña Gómez be put on trial and have her passport revoked. The government claims this legal action demonstrates an ongoing 'persecution and obsession' against Gómez. This development relates to legal proceedings involving high-profile individuals, with implications for judicial processes and political dynamics within Spain.
Bias read (Left): The article uses strong language such as 'persecución y obsesión' (persecution and obsession), which implies a negative view of the judicial action taken against Begoña Gómez. This framing suggests a critical stance toward the judiciary's actions, aligning more with leftist perspectives that often质疑
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): This article summarizes multiple legal developments involving Zapatero and Begoña Gómez, maintaining a factual tone. It presents the events in chronological order without taking sides, though it highlights the political implications.
infoLibreIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 7513 days ago
The permanent commission of Spain's Supreme Court Council (CGPJ), with the deciding vote of its president Isabel Perelló, has ordered an investigation into whether Judge Juan Carlos Peinado committed a serious disciplinary offense by suggesting that bodyguards of Begoña Gómez—wife of former Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez—could assist her in fleeing the country. The decision was supported by three progressive-aligned members and the president, who holds a casting vote. Promoter of the disciplinary action, Ricardo Conde, must now assess if Peinado violated the 'gravity of consideration' and 'abuse of authority' regarding judicial conduct. Four conservative-aligned judges issued a dissenting opinion, arguing that Peinado’s ruling should be reviewed through standard appeals at the Madrid Provincial Court rather than by the CGPJ, which they claim is overstepping its jurisdiction. In his ruling against Gómez, Peinado stated that her bodyguards could potentially aid her escape, prompting criticism from Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska, who called for disciplinary measures due to concerns about the professionalism of security forces.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the majority decision to investigate Judge Peinado and the minority dissenting view from conservative-aligned judges. It includes direct quotes from both sides, provides context about the legal arguments, and references official actions taken by the CGPJ and the InteriorMin
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Reports on the court's decision to include Zapatero's daughters and secretary in the investigation. Factual claims are precise and supported by legal proceedings. The tone remains neutral and objective, focusing on legal outcomes rather than political bias.
El MundoIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 7015 days ago
The Spanish judge Juan Carlos Peinado has issued an order to proceed with a trial against Begoña Gómez, wife of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, accusing her of four crimes including abuse of influence, corruption, misappropriation, and misuse of public funds. The judge has imposed precautionary measures preventing her from accompanying Sánchez on official trips, revoked her passport, and mandated biweekly court appearances. The case also involves her advisor, Cristina Álvarez, and businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés, who helped establish Gómez’s chair at the Complutense University. The judge argues that Gómez used her husband’s position as prime minister to advance her career, particularly after his 2018 investiture. The investigation highlights concerns over private funding for her academic role, which occurred while she held a prominent institutional position.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual legal proceedings involving high-profile political figures without overtly favoring any side. It reports on judicial actions and allegations but does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, selective sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral,
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): The article presents detailed legal proceedings and charges accurately but uses emotionally charged language like 'demoledor' and frames the case in a way that suggests bias against the accused.
elDiario.esIndependentRightFactual 90Objective 7020 days ago
The pre-trial hearing for Begoña Gómez, wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, took place at the 41st Instruction Court in Madrid. The lawyer for Gómez, Antonio Camacho, accused the judge, José Manuel Peinado, of politicizing the legal process and claimed the case is being used to undermine the Sánchez government. Camacho argued that political matters should be addressed outside the courtroom and criticized the repeated references to 'President of the Government' by Peinado, despite the latter not being under investigation.
Bias read (Right): The article presents the defense's perspective with strong accusations of judicial politicization aimed at undermining the government. The framing emphasizes the claim that the legal process is being weaponized against the ruling party, using loaded terms like 'procedimiento fantasma' ('ghost trial'
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the lawyer's statements and the court proceedings, aligning with cross-source information. While the lawyer expresses strong opinions, the factual reporting remains solid and supported by court records.
El PaísIndependent🔒LeftFactual 88Objective 8021 days ago
Begoña Gómez has another court appearance scheduled for Monday before Judge Juan Carlos Peinado. The judge has set the preliminary hearing for 6:00 PM, a necessary step toward opening a trial by jury in the ongoing legal process against her. This development brings her closer to facing charges. Peinado previously accepted a complaint from the pseudo-union Manos Limpias two years ago to initiate an investigation into Gómez, the wife of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. In April, he stated he had sufficient evidence to charge her with four offenses: misappropriation, abuse of influence, corruption,
Bias read (Left): The article references Manos Limpias, a group known for right-wing activism and allegations against Spanish politicians, which frames the legal proceedings as politically motivated. The phrasing 'pseudosindicato' implies skepticism toward the legitimacy of the organization, suggesting a critical or左
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 80): Reports on the court’s decision regarding Zapatero’s case, including legal arguments and procedural steps. Maintains a balanced tone, though slightly leans towards judicial perspective.
20minutosIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 6515 days ago
A Spanish judge, Peinado, has made a decision regarding Begoña Gómez that has increased tensions between the executive branch and the judiciary. The ruling highlights existing conflicts and divisions within Spain's political system. This development adds to the ongoing debate over the independence of the judiciary and its relationship with the government. The case involves legal proceedings against Begoña Gómez, who is associated with the current administration.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation as a conflict between the executive and judicial branches without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the judge's decision and its implications without using biased language or selectively citing sources.
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 65): This article explains the legal process regarding Judge Peinado and the potential disciplinary action. It provides factual background but frames the issue in a way that suggests a conflict between the judiciary and the executive, influencing the perceived neutrality.
elDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 6516 days ago
Judge Juan Carlos Peinado has clarified that his new investigation focuses solely on businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés regarding alleged irregularities in a public contract awarded to a consortium involving his company. The probe centers on a tender process for a project funded by European Union funds through Red.es, where Barrabés' company participated alongside KPMG. The investigation follows an order from the European Prosecution Office, which cannot take charge due to jurisdictional reasons. The case involves the absence of a required 'white book' document necessary for participation in the
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the judicial clarification without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the judge's actions and the nature of the investigation without using biased language or selectively presenting information.
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 65): The article covers Zapatero's reaction to the imputation of his daughters, presenting the legal development factually. However, it includes emotional language and speculative comments about possible legal strategies, affecting objectivity.
PúblicoIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 8013 days ago
The article discusses the challenges faced by authorities in sanctioning Judge Peinado after two and a half years of unusual legal proceedings against Begoña Gómez. The case has drawn attention due to its prolonged nature and the perceived eccentricity of the judicial process. Despite efforts to hold Judge Peinado accountable, no sanctions have been imposed, raising questions about the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms within the judiciary. The situation highlights concerns over judicial independence and accountability in Spain.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the failure to sanction Judge Peinado in a critical light, suggesting issues with judicial accountability and implying potential flaws in the system. This framing aligns with a left-leaning perspective that emphasizes transparency and reform within the judiciary.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article discusses the difficulty of sanctioning Judge Peinado after his extended investigation into Begoña Gómez. While factual, the term 'excéntrica instrucción' may introduce subjective judgment.
elDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8013 days ago
The Spanish Supreme Court has initiated disciplinary proceedings against Judge Juan Carlos Peinado over his ruling in the trial of Begoña Gómez. The Council of the Judiciary’s Permanent Commission, divided along ideological lines, decided to forward the case to the Promoter of Disciplinary Action to assess whether Peinado violated professional conduct rules. The controversy centers on Peinado’s claim that police guards assigned to protect Gómez could have facilitated her escape, which led to the imposition of precautionary measures such as passport revocation and restrictions on leaving Spain. This statement sparked criticism from the Ministry of the Interior, police unions, and Gómez’s legal team, who plan to appeal the decision. The conservative members of the commission opposed the disciplinary action, arguing that judicial decisions should be reviewed through standard legal channels rather than disciplinary procedures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation factually, citing both the actions taken by the judiciary and the criticisms raised by various stakeholders, including the Ministry of the Interior and police unions. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing, maintaining a balanced tone by
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Details the government restructuring under Mañueco, focusing on political appointments. Neutral tone and factual reporting align with cross-source consensus on administrative changes.
elDiario.esIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 8014 days ago
The article discusses the actions of Judge Peinado in a high-profile case involving Begoña Gómez, focusing on his controversial judicial decisions. The judge issued an unexpected citation for an audience where the accused was required to attend under threat of police force if she did not comply. This was followed by the erroneous inclusion of additional charges against Gómez in a separate case, which were unrelated to her current proceedings. These charges included prevarication and fraud against community interests, adding a dramatic international dimension to the case. The article criticizes the judge’s decision to revoke Gómez’s passport, suggesting it is unnecessary given the lack of evidence for any of the legal grounds for such measures. The piece highlights concerns over the judge’s discretionary power and the potential misuse of legal procedures.
Bias read (Left): The article uses critical and sarcastic language towards the judge's actions, implying judicial overreach and questioning the legitimacy of the legal measures taken. It frames the judge's decisions as excessive and politically motivated, using phrases like 'imperium of law' and highlighting the lack
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Reports on the valuation of jewelry seized from Zapatero, providing specific monetary figures. Maintains a factual tone, though some phrasing may imply political context.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Spain
