La Palma's open wound five years after the lava: "The volcano continues to kill with sadness"
Five years after the volcanic eruption on La Palma, residents continue to suffer from emotional trauma and institutional neglect. Fátima Ramos, a local resident who lost her home, describes the ongoing psychological impact of the disaster, which has not resulted in physical casualties but has caused lasting distress. The association Tierra Bonita criticizes the lack of an institutional commemoration event for the catastrophe, emphasizing its significance as one of Europe’s worst volcanic disasters in a century. Official data from the National Geographic Institute (IGN) highlights the scale of the disaster, including over 7,000 evacuated people, 2,100 homes destroyed, and extensive agricultural damage. Despite promises of recovery by regional leaders, affected communities report continued bureaucratic delays, insufficient planning, and limited citizen involvement in reconstruction efforts. Tierra Bonita calls for immediate action, including the activation of the Council for Economic and Social Reconstruction of La Palma, which was formally established in 2023 but has yet to convene.
Five years have passed since the eruption of the Cumbre Vieja volcano on La Palma, yet the island’s landscape and lives remain transformed. The eruption began at 3:11 PM on September 19, 2021, in Cabeza de Vaca, within the municipality of El Paso. It lasted 85 days and eight hours, making it the longest volcanic eruption in the island's history. The lava covered hundreds of homes, destroyed crops, and extended toward the sea, creating some of Europe’s youngest beaches, spanning two kilometers in total. For residents of La Palma, however, life has become smaller and more uncertain. The eruption devastated parts of the island, particularly the Valle de Aridane, where communities such as La Laguna and Todoque were severely impacted. Marcelino Rodríguez, president of the neighborhood association of La Laguna, described the experience as a battle against an unstoppable force. He recalled how the volcanic activity from Tajogaite buried memories and disrupted daily life for months. His neighborhood was split into two, and he admitted that during those difficult times, there was little time to think beyond survival. Five years later, the emotional toll remains heavy, with many still struggling to return home. For Marcelino, the physical destruction was only one challenge. The psychological impact has been equally profound. He noted that while the lava stopped just one meter from his house, the aftermath brought its own kind of suffering. Residents had to endure long periods of uncertainty, waiting for infrastructure to be rebuilt. “When the volcano stopped, we had another volcano here, the machinery,” he said. The constant noise and disruption took a mental toll, leaving many feeling drained. Fátima Ramos, a member of the affected families' platform, echoed similar sentiments. She lost everything she worked for over 25 years, including her home in Todoque. She now lives with her in-laws, unable to afford a permanent residence despite receiving financial aid. Government assistance included up to €60,480 for damaged homes, later increased to €100,000 through combined efforts of national and regional authorities. However, these funds often fell short of what was needed to rebuild a home. Rising property prices further complicated recovery efforts, leaving many in temporary housing. Eva, who once lived near a school in Todoque, still resides in a container after five years. Her home was eventually freed from lava, but the process of rebuilding has been slow. Many families, like hers, continue to live in makeshift shelters, struggling with the lack of privacy and comfort. In Los Llanos, residents complain of poor insulation and temperature control in their containers. “I can’t feel this place is my home,” Eva said. “I can’t move around freely. From the sofa to the bed, I stay in circles.” The issue extends beyond physical space. Many affected families found themselves isolated from their former communities. Social ties were strained as people adapted to new living conditions. Two sisters from La Laguna, whose neighborhood was partially destroyed, described how their previous lifestyle, living among family and neighbors with gardens and animals, contrasted sharply with the cramped confines of a container. “We used to live together, and everyone knew each other,” they said. Now, they face the challenge of adjusting to a life that feels disconnected from their roots. Rebuilding efforts have faced numerous obstacles. Many residents built their homes gradually, using land and resources available in rural areas. However, these informal structures often lacked legal recognition, complicating access to aid. Some families could not prove residency due to unofficial housing arrangements, limiting their eligibility for compensation. The volcanic eruption not only destroyed homes but also disrupted the sense of belonging and community that defined life in La Palma. Despite these challenges, small steps are being taken. Some families have purchased land and modular homes, while others continue working with local builders. Yet, for many, the path to recovery remains long and uncertain. As the island continues to heal, so too do its people, though the scars of the past will take time to fade.
2 reports
El ConfidencialIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 94Objective 86
Five years after the volcanic eruption on La Palma, residents continue to suffer from emotional trauma and institutional neglect. Fátima Ramos, a local resident who lost her home, describes the ongoing psychological impact of the disaster, which has not resulted in physical casualties but has caused lasting distress. The association Tierra Bonita criticizes the lack of an institutional commemoration event for the catastrophe, emphasizing its significance as one of Europe’s worst volcanic disasters in a century. Official data from the National Geographic Institute (IGN) highlights the scale of the disaster, including over 7,000 evacuated people, 2,100 homes destroyed, and extensive agricultural damage. Despite promises of recovery by regional leaders, affected communities report continued bureaucratic delays, insufficient planning, and limited citizen involvement in reconstruction efforts. Tierra Bonita calls for immediate action, including the activation of the Council for Economic and Social Reconstruction of La Palma, which was formally established in 2023 but has yet to convene.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as one of institutional failure and bureaucratic inefficiency, highlighting criticism of government actions and calling for more democratic participation in decision-making processes. It emphasizes the emotional and social impacts of the disaster, aligning with left翼
Why factuality (94): The article provides specific details such as the five-year anniversary, the duration of the eruption (85 days), the number of evacuated people (7,000), homes destroyed (2,100), and hectares of crops lost (300). These figures align with general knowledge of the 2021 La Palma volcanic eruption. The m
Why objectivity (86): The article presents the perspectives of affected residents and organizations like Tierra Bonita, highlighting their concerns about institutional neglect and lack of transparency. While it includes quotes and criticisms, it does not overly favor one perspective over another. However, the phrase 'la
Five years after the eruption of the Cumbre Vieja volcano on La Palma in September 2021, 110 families still live in temporary containers due to ongoing housing challenges. The eruption destroyed over 1,600 homes and entire neighborhoods like El Paraíso and Todoque, leaving many residents displaced. Despite financial aid from national and regional governments, many affected individuals lack proper documentation to claim compensation or rebuild. Many residents built their homes gradually over time without formal registration, making it difficult to prove ownership. Additionally, some were not officially registered in the area, preventing them from accessing support. The situation highlights systemic issues such as high living costs, limited urban development, and the informal nature of housing construction in rural areas.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the housing crisis caused by the volcanic eruption, highlighting both the structural challenges faced by residents and the limitations of governmental support. It does not overtly favor any political ideology but emphasizes the complexity of the issue, with
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports on the ongoing housing crisis five years after the eruption, citing statistics like the number of affected homes and financial aid amounts. It references specific individuals' experiences, which align with the general consensus on the slow progress of recovery. Some de
Why objectivity (60): The piece has a clear focus on the struggles of affected families, using vivid descriptions and personal stories. This approach makes the content engaging but also introduces a degree of subjectivity, as it highlights particular hardships without balancing perspectives.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.