ON
← Back to feed
US and Iran return to open war after a week of clashes in Hormuz
Spain🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive21 hr. ago

US and Iran return to open war after a week of clashes in Hormuz

The article reports renewed open conflict between the United States and Iran after a week of clashes in the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. has declared war against Tehran, with military strikes targeting Iranian locations and Iranian forces retaliating by attacking American interests in neighboring countries and sinking two oil tankers in the strait, resulting in casualties. The U.S. military claims successful precision strikes on Iranian military targets, while Iranian state media report civilian and military casualties. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attacks U.S. facilities in Jordan and Bahrain, calling them 'crimes' committed by 'child-killing soldiers.' The UAE condemns the Iranian attack on its oil tankers as a violation of international law. Both sides accuse each other of breaking ceasefire agreements.

The United States and Iran have resumed open hostilities after a week of escalating clashes near the Strait of Hormuz. On Tuesday morning, US forces launched precision strikes against multiple Iranian military sites, marking a renewed phase of conflict following the June 17 ceasefire agreement. President Donald Trump has formally notified Congress that the country is once again at war with Tehran. The attacks targeted locations including Bushehr, Chabahar, Jask, Konarak, Abu Musa, and Bandar Abbas, all situated along the southern coast of Iran or on islands in the Persian Gulf. These areas house key commercial ports, oil infrastructure, and, notably, Bushehr’s sole civilian nuclear power plant. According to reports from Iranian media, at least four individuals were injured in Omidiyeh, Khuzestan province, while the state-run agency Fars confirmed three deaths in Hormozgan province due to recent US bombings. Since the US resumed its attacks on Iran late Tuesday night, over twenty casualties, including civilians and military personnel, have been recorded, with more than a hundred others wounded, according to health ministry data. In response, Iran's Revolutionary Guards announced they had struck US military targets in Jordan and the US Fifth Fleet base in Bahrain using ballistic missiles. They claimed these actions were retaliation for US aggression, calling the attackers "killers of children." Jordan stated it intercepted four missiles fired into its territory. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defense of the United Arab Emirates condemned the Iranian attack on two oil tankers linked to the UAE, which resulted in the death of an Indian sailor and injuries to eight others, including six Indians and two Ukrainians. The UAE criticized the attack as a violation of international law. A spokesperson for Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, General Brigadier Hossein Mohebi, explained that the vessels had violated Iran’s weekend closure order on the strait, claiming they were misled by the US to use the route despite repeated warnings. He stated the ships were disabled because they ignored safety protocols. India has summoned the Iranian ambassador in New Delhi to officially protest the attack. The situation threatens to expand beyond the Strait of Hormuz. The Houthi government in Yemen, aligned with Iran, announced it had attacked the airport in Abha, Saudi Arabia, following a bombing of Sana’a International Airport by the Saudi-backed Aden government. This occurred after a plane carrying a Houthi delegation attending the funeral of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei landed there. The Houthis have also threatened to resume attacks on vessels in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which connects the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean, making it vital for global trade. The region has already witnessed some of the most intense fighting during previous conflicts.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

3 reports

El País logoEl PaísIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 85Objective 655 days ago
US and Iran return to open war after a week of clashes in Hormuz

The article reports renewed open conflict between the United States and Iran after a week of clashes in the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. has declared war against Tehran, with military strikes targeting Iranian locations and Iranian forces retaliating by attacking American interests in neighboring countries and sinking two oil tankers in the strait, resulting in casualties. The U.S. military claims successful precision strikes on Iranian military targets, while Iranian state media report civilian and military casualties. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attacks U.S. facilities in Jordan and Bahrain, calling them 'crimes' committed by 'child-killing soldiers.' The UAE condemns the Iranian attack on its oil tankers as a violation of international law. Both sides accuse each other of breaking ceasefire agreements.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict through the lens of Iranian retaliation and portrays U.S. actions as aggressive and illegal, using terms like 'child-killing soldiers' and 'grave violation of international law.' It emphasizes the humanitarian impact of U.S. strikes and highlights Iranian claims of U.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article provides specific details about locations targeted by US strikes and mentions casualties reported by Iranian sources. However, it lacks independent verification of these casualty figures and presents the conflict as a resumption of open war between the US and Iran, which may overstate th

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 655 days ago
Oil continues to rise and the Ibex loses 19,200 points in the heat of the war

The article discusses the ongoing escalation of tensions between the United States under Donald Trump and Iran, which has led to increased volatility in oil prices and stock markets. The price of Brent crude rose by 2% this Tuesday, reaching $84.9 per barrel, marking a 6% increase in just two days. Meanwhile, the Ibex index fell below the 19,200-point mark, losing nearly 1% as investors react to geopolitical uncertainty. The Strait of Hormuz, through which 25% of the world’s oil passes, remains a focal point of instability, with Iran attacking Western vessels and the U.S. conducting airstrikes, reducing global supply and driving up prices. European and Asian stock indices also experienced declines, though some recovered slightly by Tuesday morning.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the geopolitical situation involving the U.S., Iran, and its impact on global markets. It reports on both the rising oil prices and the decline in stock indices without overtly favoring any particular political stance. While the article highlights the U.S.’

Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 65): The article provides plausible context about market reactions to geopolitical tensions but lacks specific data points like exact percentage changes in the Ibex or oil prices. The narrative leans slightly toward emphasizing instability without balancing it with counterarguments or positive economic i

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentProgressive21 hr. ago
Why Trump's comings and goings are pushing the solution to the Strait of Hormuz crisis further away

The article discusses how Donald Trump's erratic approach to the conflict with Iran has complicated efforts to resolve tensions over the Strait of Hormuz. It highlights Trump's shifting strategies, including his proposal to impose a 20% toll on ships passing through the strait, which was quickly abandoned due to strong opposition from shipping companies, U.S. officials, and international organizations like the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The piece notes that this move contradicts longstanding principles of freedom of navigation upheld by European leaders and U.S. officials, who argue that tolls would violate international law. The situation risks escalating oil prices and potentially undermining Trump’s political standing ahead of mid-term elections.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Trump's actions as reckless and destabilizing, emphasizing the potential negative consequences for both regional stability and U.S. domestic politics. It criticizes the U.S. administration's lack of coherent policy alternatives and highlights the contradiction between Trump's toll

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories