ON
← Back to feed
Loose ends one year after Miguel Uribe Turbay's murder, a testimony has not been investigated and there are no responsibilities in the UNP
CO🏛️ PoliticsProgressive14 days ago

Loose ends one year after Miguel Uribe Turbay's murder, a testimony has not been investigated and there are no responsibilities in the UNP

One year after the assassination of presidential candidate Miguel Uribe Turbay, new information has emerged from a 17-year-old who voluntarily provided details about the logistics and planning of the attack. The youth, identified in the case file as E. J. M. M., described being introduced to 'Chipi' (Élder José Arteaga), a figure linked to organized crime in Bogotá, who allegedly assigned him a role in the killing. The teenager reported that 'Chipi' showed him a photo of the victim and indicated that he was responsible for the murder. He also mentioned the involvement of 'sayayines del Bronx,' a dangerous criminal group based in Bogotá, and a man named Erick Josué in the planning of the crime. Despite providing this critical information, the young person was not formally linked to the investigation. The report highlights ongoing gaps in the investigation despite some progress in identifying the Second Marquetalia organization as the orchestrators of the attack.

On August 11, 2025, one year after the assassination of Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay, the country will hold a series of commemorations in Bogotá to mark his passing. The event begins with a memorial service at the Church of the Immaculate Conception at 2 p.m., followed by the unveiling of a monument in Parque El Golfito, the site of the attack that took Uribe’s life. His father, Miguel Uribe Londoño, wife Delia Jaramillo, daughter, and other family members have been invited to participate in both ceremonies. The senator's death, which occurred on June 7, 2025, was the result of a targeted attack by the Second Marquetalia, a group associated with armed conflict and political violence. The incident has sparked renewed calls for justice, particularly regarding who gave the order for the killing. The anniversary has brought renewed attention to the unresolved aspects of the case. Despite ongoing investigations and several arrests related to the execution and logistics of the attack, the identity of the person who issued the final command remains unknown. This lack of clarity has fueled public frustration, especially among Uribe’s family and supporters. They argue that the pursuit of justice must extend beyond identifying those directly responsible to include those who orchestrated the attack from behind the scenes. The families of victims of political violence continue to demand protection, support, and recognition, emphasizing that honoring Uribe means more than just acknowledging his legacy, it requires tangible action to ensure such tragedies do not repeat. President Abelardo de la Espriella, who assumed office shortly after Uribe’s death, has faced scrutiny over his role in the circumstances leading up to the assassination. Critics argue that during his tenure, the government had knowledge of a plot against Uribe but failed to take preventive measures. Additionally, some accuse him of publicly denigrating Uribe and his political allies, contributing to an environment of hostility that may have facilitated the attack. While de la Espriella has expressed condolences and called for accountability, many believe his leadership has yet to fully address the systemic failures that allowed the crime to occur. In a recent speech during the swearing-in ceremony of the new president, de la Espriella acknowledged that Uribe was killed by those within the regime, whom he described as having since fallen from power. However, this statement has not satisfied those who insist that the truth must be uncovered through legal channels. Legal experts and human rights organizations emphasize that the responsibility of the state extends beyond symbolic gestures, there is a need for thorough investigation, prosecution, and conviction of all individuals involved in the planning and execution of the murder. Uribe, a prominent leader of the Centro Democrático party, was known for his commitment to democratic values and his vision for a safer, more equitable Colombia. He believed in the possibility of a future free from the violence and fear that shaped his early years. His assassination has left a deep scar on Colombian society, not only because of the loss of a respected figure but also because it highlights the continued risks faced by political leaders in the country. His family continues to advocate for justice, insisting that the truth must come to light, even if it means confronting powerful figures who may have played a role in the tragedy. The memory of Miguel Uribe Turbay lives on through the efforts of those who carry forward his ideals. His legacy is not confined to historical records or political discourse, it is embodied in the work of activists, journalists, and citizens who refuse to accept impunity. As the nation reflects on his life and death, the call for justice remains urgent. Who gave the order? That question lingers, unanswered, as the search for truth continues.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

Semana logoSemanaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7015 days ago
An Inpec guard was killed a few meters from the prison in Itagüí, Antioquia

On August 13, 2026, Wilber Ferney Martínez Sana, a member of the Inpec guards at the maximum security prison in Itagüí, Antioquia, was assassinated by two individuals who shot him multiple times in the head shortly after he began his shift. The attack occurred in the San Francisco neighborhood, just meters from the prison. Security cameras later identified the suspects' taxi, which was stopped by police, and one individual was found with the weapon used in the shooting. The Inpec reported that initial responders conducted an inspection of the scene and are still investigating the motive behind the attack. The incident follows the recent transfer of 17 criminal leaders involved in peace talks with President Petro, including figures from Medellín's criminal gangs. The national president of the Union of Prison Workers (UTP), Óscar Robayo, condemned the killing, calling for greater safety guarantees for prison staff.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the assassination within the broader context of ongoing tensions between prison authorities and organized crime, particularly highlighting the recent transfers of high-profile criminals linked to peace negotiations under President Petro. While the event itself is a tragic act of暴力

Why factuality (85): The article reports the killing of Wilber Ferney Martínez Sana, a guard at the Itagüí prison, by two individuals who shot him multiple times in the head. It provides details such as the time (6:23 AM), location (San Francisco neighborhood near the prison), and the subsequent police involvement. The

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the event in a somewhat sensationalized manner, using phrases like 'se acabó la parranda' (the party ended) which implies a narrative beyond mere reporting. There is also a focus on the transfer of dangerous criminals from the prison, suggesting an underlying agenda related to c

Semana logoSemanaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7017 days ago
Miguel Uribe Turbay will be honored on Tuesday in Bogotá

The country marks one year since the assassination of Miguel Uribe Turbay, a prominent leader of the Centro Democrático during the previous election campaign. He was killed by the Second Marquetalia in a targeted attack at Parque El Golfito in Bogotá on June 7, 2025. This Tuesday, August 11, there will be a tribute at the Church of the Immaculate Conception at 2 p.m., organized by his family and friends. Additionally, a monument in his honor will be unveiled at the site of the attack. Political leaders such as former President Iván Duque and Álvaro Uribe have recalled his legacy, emphasizing the impact of his death on Colombian politics and society.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses the assassination of a political figure and includes statements from various political leaders, it presents these perspectives neutrally without overtly favoring any particular ideology. The focus is on remembrance and the broader implications of his death rather than a鲜明

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the anniversary of Miguel Uribe Turbay's death, the date of his assassination (July 7, 2025), and the planned commemorations. It mentions the political context of his role in the Centro Democrático and the impact of his murder. However, it includes some subjective stat

Why objectivity (70): The article presents information with a somewhat emotional tone, particularly in quotes from political leaders who express personal grief and political commentary. While it provides factual details about events, it frames them through a political lens, potentially influencing the reader’s perception

Semana logoSemanaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6514 days ago
Loose ends one year after Miguel Uribe Turbay's murder, a testimony has not been investigated and there are no responsibilities in the UNP

One year after the assassination of presidential candidate Miguel Uribe Turbay, new information has emerged from a 17-year-old who voluntarily provided details about the logistics and planning of the attack. The youth, identified in the case file as E. J. M. M., described being introduced to 'Chipi' (Élder José Arteaga), a figure linked to organized crime in Bogotá, who allegedly assigned him a role in the killing. The teenager reported that 'Chipi' showed him a photo of the victim and indicated that he was responsible for the murder. He also mentioned the involvement of 'sayayines del Bronx,' a dangerous criminal group based in Bogotá, and a man named Erick Josué in the planning of the crime. Despite providing this critical information, the young person was not formally linked to the investigation. The report highlights ongoing gaps in the investigation despite some progress in identifying the Second Marquetalia organization as the orchestrators of the attack.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the investigation into the assassination of a prominent political figure with a focus on systemic failures and institutional neglect. It emphasizes the lack of accountability within the National Police (UNP) and highlights the involvement of organized crime groups, which aligns a左

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the ongoing investigation into the murder of Miguel Uribe Turbay, citing details from an unnamed 17-year-old witness who allegedly provided information about the planning of the attack. It mentions the identification of the Second Marquetalia as the organization responsible, w

Why objectivity (65): The tone leans toward sensationalism by emphasizing the 'magnicidio' and the 'cabos sueltos,' suggesting unresolved issues. The article presents the case as significant and urgent, potentially influencing reader perception. While it provides factual elements, it frames the situation in a way that ma

Semana logoSemanaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6020 days ago
Who gave the order?

One year after the assassination of Miguel Uribe Turbay, his death continues to impact his family, friends, and Colombian politics. The article highlights the lack of clarity regarding who gave the order for his murder, despite ongoing investigations and some arrests. It criticizes the government under President Gustavo Petro for allegedly knowing about a plot against Turbay and failing to act, while also accusing Petro of publicly targeting Turbay and the opposition, contributing to a climate of stigmatization. The author calls for justice, emphasizing the need to hold those responsible accountable and protect the victims' families.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the assassination of Miguel Uribe Turbay as a politically motivated crime linked to the government under President Gustavo Petro. It accuses Petro of fostering a hostile environment toward Turbay and the opposition, which contributed to the violence. The tone leans left by calling

Why factuality (85): The article discusses the anniversary of Miguel Uribe Turbay's assassination and mentions ongoing investigations into who gave the order. It references the political context, including Gustavo Petro's government, but does not provide specific evidence or sources for claims about Petro's involvement.

Why objectivity (60): The tone is emotionally charged, focusing on the personal impact of Turbay's death and expressing frustration over the lack of justice. The article frames the issue as a moral imperative and includes subjective statements like 'se siente en su casa' and 'no se trata solo de mencionarlo en un discurs

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories