ON
← Back to feed
They question the handover of Notaria Sexta of Cartagena days after the end of the Petro government
CO🏛️ PoliticsConservative6 hr. ago

They question the handover of Notaria Sexta of Cartagena days after the end of the Petro government

The article discusses concerns over the interim appointment of Karina Margarita Vásquez Buelvas as the sixth notary of Cartagena, just days before the end of President Gustavo Petro’s administration. The new appointee is linked to figures associated with the opposition Pacto Histórico, including former congressman Fernando Niño, who faces allegations of vote-buying during the 2022 election. The incoming administration of President-elect Abelardo De La Espriella has expressed skepticism about these connections, raising questions about potential political influence in judicial appointments. Vásquez is also related to José Julián Vásquez, a regional leader of the same party, and has ties to former Cartagena mayor Manolo Duque, accused of corruption.

A new legal front has emerged against Colombian President Gustavo Petro, with extradited drug traffickers allegedly cooperating with U.S. authorities to reveal information about financial support given to his 2022 presidential campaign. According to reports, several individuals who were arrested in the United States have decided to provide evidence to American prosecutors, potentially implicating members of Petro’s inner circle. The revelations could significantly impact Petro's administration, particularly if they confirm allegations of illicit funding during his electoral campaign. The developments come amid growing scrutiny over the origins of Petro’s political rise. Sources indicate that some of these traffickers, who had been detained in U.S. prisons, have chosen to speak under strict confidentiality agreements. Their testimonies reportedly include claims that certain armed groups provided substantial financial backing to Petro’s campaign before he became president. These allegations have been dubbed the “La Picota Agreement,” referencing a notorious prison in Bogotá where some of the accused were once held. Among those implicated is Juan Fernando Petro, the president’s brother, who was previously linked to the case. One of the extradited individuals, Pipe Tuluá, reportedly handed over an audio recording to journalist Vicky Dávila shortly before his extradition. In the recording, Tuluá claimed to have provided millions of dollars to Petro’s campaign. Additionally, he provided a photograph showing Juan Fernando Petro alongside other figures associated with the alleged financing network. The potential implications of these revelations are vast. If confirmed, they could lead to investigations into the legality of Petro’s campaign finances and possibly affect the legitimacy of his presidency. U.S. authorities have long been interested in tracing the flow of money related to drug trafficking and its influence on politics in Colombia. This case could represent a significant shift in how such issues are addressed, especially with the current administration’s emphasis on peace and reconciliation with former guerrilla groups. The situation involves multiple stakeholders, including Colombian law enforcement, U.S. federal agencies, and international media outlets. Colombian officials have yet to officially comment on the allegations, though some analysts suggest that the government might face pressure to investigate further. Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Justice has not publicly acknowledged the specific details of the cooperation between the extradited individuals and American prosecutors. Background on this issue dates back to the early stages of Petro’s political career. His party, the Historical Memory Group, has often emphasized anti-corruption measures and transparency in governance. However, the allegations now emerging challenge the narrative of clean politics that Petro has promoted throughout his tenure. The involvement of family members adds another layer of complexity, raising questions about the extent of any possible collusion. Sources differ slightly on the exact nature of the financial contributions and the identities of all parties involved. Some reports suggest that the funds came directly from drug cartels, while others imply indirect support through intermediaries. Regardless of the specifics, the cooperation between the U.S. justice system and these extradited individuals marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing fight against organized crime in Latin America. Petro’s administration has faced challenges since taking office, including managing relations with both traditional political allies and newly formed coalitions. The emergence of these allegations could test the resilience of his leadership and force him to address concerns about the integrity of his campaign. As the investigation unfolds, it will be crucial to determine whether the claims hold up under scrutiny and what actions, if any, will be taken by Colombian authorities in response.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Semana logoSemanaIndependentConservativeFactual 65Objective 453 days ago
The new judicial front for Petro: extradited drug traffickers would talk to US justice

The article reports that several extradited drug traffickers detained in the United States have decided to cooperate with U.S. authorities, potentially implicating President Gustavo Petro's administration. These individuals claim to have provided financial support to Petro's 2022 presidential campaign. The revelations were initially referred to as 'The Pact of La Picota,' which implicated Juan Fernando Petro, the president’s brother. One of the extradited figures, Pipe Tuluá, allegedly gave a recording to journalist Vicky Dávila before his extradition, revealing he had contributed millions to the campaign and shared a photograph showing a family member of the current head of state.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the actions of extradited drug traffickers as potential threats to Petro's administration, emphasizing their cooperation with U.S. justice and suggesting possible corruption within the government. It highlights specific allegations against Petro's family and uses terms like 'salpí

Why factuality (65): The article reports on allegations that former extradited drug traffickers may have provided financial support to Gustavo Petro’s campaign. It references 'Pacto de La Picota' and mentions Pipe Tuluá providing an audio to journalist Vicky Dávila. While these claims are reported by Semana, there is no

Why objectivity (45): The tone of the article leans toward suggesting potential wrongdoing by Petro’s administration, using phrases like 'salpicar duramente' (strongly stain) and implying that the information comes from credible sources. However, it does not present alternative viewpoints or counterarguments, making the

Semana logoSemanaIndependentConservativeFactual 60Objective 406 hr. ago
They question the handover of Notaria Sexta of Cartagena days after the end of the Petro government

The article discusses concerns over the interim appointment of Karina Margarita Vásquez Buelvas as the sixth notary of Cartagena, just days before the end of President Gustavo Petro’s administration. The new appointee is linked to figures associated with the opposition Pacto Histórico, including former congressman Fernando Niño, who faces allegations of vote-buying during the 2022 election. The incoming administration of President-elect Abelardo De La Espriella has expressed skepticism about these connections, raising questions about potential political influence in judicial appointments. Vásquez is also related to José Julián Vásquez, a regional leader of the same party, and has ties to former Cartagena mayor Manolo Duque, accused of corruption.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the appointment of Vásquez as part of a broader concern about political influence in judicial roles, particularly linking her to opposition figures and past corruption scandals. It emphasizes the incoming administration’s distrust of the outgoing government’s last-minute decisions

Why factuality (60): This article discusses the appointment of Karina Margarita Vásquez Buelves as interim head of the Notaría Sexta in Cartagena, linking her to political figures such as Fernando Niño and José Julián Vásquez. It cites concerns raised by the incoming president Abelardo De La Espriella regarding possible

Why objectivity (40): The article presents the situation in a way that suggests political bias, particularly against the outgoing Petro government. Phrases like 'presunta compra de votos' (presumed vote buying) and highlighting familial and political connections imply a negative judgment without offering balanced perspec

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories