Judge Peinado summons Begoña Gómez to the last preliminary hearing before taking her to trial.

El MundoIndependent🔒Center6 hr. ago

The wife of Spain's Prime Minister, Begoña Gómez, has been summoned by Judge Juan Carlos Peinado for the final procedural step before her case proceeds to a trial by jury. This follows the submission of a new defense team's request for acquittal. The court previously issued an order to open the trial but had to revise certain aspects after appeals from the defense. The Audiencia de Madrid rejected requests to dismiss the case against Gómez and her advisor, Cristina Álvarez, while excluding businessman Juan Carlos Barrabés from the case. The upcoming hearing could lead to a formal decision to proceed with the trial, which would then be handled by the Provincial Court. The process concludes around the time of Judge Peinado’s retirement this September.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of legal proceedings involving a high-profile political figure without overtly favoring any side. It reports on judicial actions and legal arguments neutrally, citing the involvement of the prime minister's spouse and the legal framework governing the case. No煽

elDiario.esIndependentCenter6 hr. ago

The judge Juan Carlos Peinado has scheduled a final preliminary hearing for Begoña Gómez, wife of Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, and her assistant Cristina Álvarez, ahead of a trial by jury for charges including abuse of influence, corruption in business dealings, misappropriation, and illegal appropriation. The hearing is set for Tuesday at 6 PM, with both individuals required to appear in person. This follows the defense teams submitting their provisional conclusions and refusing to abandon the hearing. The judge rejected the defense’s request to summon Professor José Manuel Ruano as a witness, stating his testimony was not essential for determining whether to open the trial. The new lawyer for Begoña Gómez submitted another legal brief after the July approval of the investigation by Madrid’s Provincial Court, arguing that the alleged crimes are untrue and do not constitute offenses. Similarly, Cristina Álvarez’s defense claims the described acts are not criminal and that the case is doomed to fail.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the procedural developments in a judicial case involving high-profile political figures without overtly favoring any side. It reports on court decisions, legal arguments, and procedural steps without taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject matter is highly politic化,